Archive | September 2008

To Vote or Not to Vote

I’ve had a lot of people telling me that they may not vote in this election because they don’t much like either of the candidates. One woman at church very eloquently explained how she saw both of the candidates for president supporting the 700 billion dollar bailout of Wall Street, and how wrong that bailout was, and how she could not in good conscience vote for either candidate since she didn’t agree with their positions on the bailout and on immigration. Someone else who watched the debate said she didn’t trust either McCain or Obama and didn’t agree with them in several areas where they agreed with each other. So she was thinking about “protesting” by not voting.

I must say to these women, and to others of you who may be considering NOT voting in this election, that I believe that abstaining from voting in this election is a betrayal of trust, dereliction of duty, and just plain wrong. Because we live in a democracy, we, the people, rule this country. The system works imperfectly, and none of the candidates is me. So I can’t agree wholeheartedly with any one candidate. In fact, I’ll admit that I’ve never been very fond of Senator McCain, and Senator Obama doesn’t seem to me to be ready to run my local elementary school, much less the nation. Both men are flawed, and the vice-presidential candidates, both of them, as much as I like and admire Sarah Palin, have their problems, too. Mr. Biden comes across as a political hack, and as a mom, I’m frankly worried about Ms. Palin’s daughter and her need for mothering at a critical time in her young adult life. I could readily find reasons not to vote for any of them.

So, why am I saying that voting is a trust and a duty anyway? We live in an imperfect world. There are no perfect or perfectly righteous or completely wise candidates for any office, ever, as much as we may wish there were. So we choose the better of two (or more) imperfect candidates. We choose knowing that we may be mistaken, knowing that our candidate, if elected, will do things that we disagree with and will imperfectly implement even the policies with which we agree, if he can implement them at all. We vote on the basis of both issues and the character of the candidates themselves, knowing that our knowledge of both issues and character is also imperfect and incomplete. But to remain silent and nonvoting is also a choice. It’s a choice which says that I refuse to act in this world until I can be sure that my actions will not be misinterpreted, my plans will not go awry, and everyone else in the world will act in perfect integrity just as I do always. We don’t live in that world and won’t for some time to come.

God is in control, but he’s not running for president. When Esther was called upon to help rescue her people from the wicked designs of Haman, she had legitimate reasons to refuse to act. To go before the king might cost her life. And the king of Persia was a pagan, not a believer in the one true God. So did she have any business being in his palace in the first place? But Mordecai, her uncle, told her:

“For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place and you and your father’s house will perish. And who knows whether you have not attained royalty for such a time as this?”

God does not need your vote or mine to steer this country in whatever direction He pleases. But He gives us the privilege and the duty of participating in the great decisions that confront our nation. And we must choose the best we can with the wisdom that God has given to each of us. If you have not registered to vote, please do so today. And if you are considering the idea of sitting at home and not voting this November, please join me instead in committing your vote to the Lord and making the best decision you can, in His care, about the men and women who should lead this country. Who knows whether you have not been given your vote for such a time as this?

Sabbath Prayer List: September 28, 2008

I intended to post his list last night, but maybe there was a reason to ask for your prayers now instead of then.

Pray for Iran and for Muslims and Christians in Iran.

Pray for those who have lost their homes or have severely damaged homes as a result of Hurricane Ike. Families I know personally that you can pray for by name: The Olsons, the Rangels, the Joneses. Al three of these families have homes that are uninhabitable and will be for quite some time.

The Anchoress: “I’m a praying person and so I am going to pray for wisdom for our leadership and also within the electorate, that we might be guided toward the most authentic and clear-thinking of the candidates, the one most dedicated to serving the people of this nation, and not the elitists. We need authenticity. We need clear-thinking.”

Molly and her family.

Noah and his family.

Sunday Salon: The Youngest Templar and the Oldest Me

It hasn’t been much of a reading week. Instead we’ve had lots of after-Ike fun and several family crises and issues.


I did read an ARC that I got a couple of weeks ago called The Youngest Templar: Keeper of the Grail by Michael P. Spradlin. It’s an adventure story for kids/YA in the same vein as the movie adventures Raiders of the Lost Ark or Star Wars. However, this adventure is set during the Third Crusade with Richard the Lion-Hearted and a Robin Hood-ish character making major appearances. Our young hero, Tristan, is an orphan of mysterious parentage, raised in St. Alban’s Abbey, and at the age of fifteen asked to become the squire of Sir Thomas Leux, a member of the Order of Knights Templar. In quick succession, events unfold: Tristan acquires a powerful enemy, meets the King of England, travels to the Holy Land, participates in a battle, and is given a very important mission.

I enjoyed the book very much, and I think any boy (or girl) with an interest in knights and castles and battles will like it, too. However, there is a huge problem with the book. You’ll notice that the small print on the cover of the book says “Book 1”. The book ends with what can only be called a cliffhanger, completely unresolved, and the next book is due to be published in Fall 2009. If you can live with the cliffhanger that is LOST, and the many other unresolved story lines that we get in book series and TV series nowadays, stories that are “to be continued” a whole year from their initiation, then go ahead and read The Youngest Templar: Keeper of the Grail. If not, you could wait until next year to start the series, but since I’m betting that there will be a third book, or maybe even more, you may not want to hold your breath until the adventure ends.

This one is all about movement and plot, thrills and spills, and as Mr. Spradlin’s website advises, “Action. Drama. Humor. And stuff BLOWS UP.” I don’t exactly remember where anything blew up in this book. I think it’s setting is pre-gunpowder. But there are swords, slicing and dicing, and assassins. What more could you ask for?

By the way, I think I’ll try this: I See What You’re Saying., if I can manage to upload a video. I’ve never put a picture of myself on the blog for the same reason I don’t look in the mirror too often. This way, I don’t have to stare at myself, and I can pretend I still look the same way I did when I was twenty-something. I don’t mind being fifty-one, but I don’t like the way I look as much as I used to. Nevertheless, this will be a one-time thing, and I hope some of you will participate, too. I’d enjoy seeing (and hearing) some of you whose voices I have only seen in print.

Really Important News

Forget about the economic crisis. Did you know that Scrabulous, the Scrabble-based online game, has been shut down? Hasbro, the company that owns the Scrabble copyright or trademark or whatever it’s called, didn’t like that fact that a couple of enterprising brothers from India were making lots of money in advertising revenue from the free online scrabble-like games. So Hasbro tried to buy them out, then sued them.

But never fear, the Scrab— Online Universe has not collapsed. It looks as if Scrabulous has moved to Lexulous.com, and my old password and user name work at the new site.

Poetry and Fine Art Friday: Eliot and Frangipane

Today is the 120th birthday of T.S. Eliot, poet of twentieth century angst and twentieth century faith. I liked this poem because I remember one time long ago laughing hysterically and concentrating on one thing to calm myself.

HYSTERIA

by: T.S. Eliot (1888-1965)

As she laughed I was aware of becoming involved
in her laughter and being part of it, until her
teeth were only accidental stars with a talent
for squad-drill. I was drawn in by short gasps,
inhaled at each momentary recovery, lost finally
in the dark caverns of her throat, bruised by
the ripple of unseen muscles. An elderly waiter
with trembling hands was hurriedly spreading
a pink and white checked cloth over the rusty
green iron table, saying: “If the lady and
gentleman wish to take their tea in the garden,
if the lady and gentleman wish to take their
tea in the garden …” I decided that if the
shaking of her breasts could be stopped, some of
the fragments of the afternoon might be collected,
and I concentrated my attention with careful
subtlety to this end.

“Hysteria” was originally printed in Catholic Anthology, November 1915.

Mr. Eliot might have enjoyed this picture by Niccolo Frangipane since it combines the laughter of the poem with a cat. Eliot was rather fond of cats.

Four People Laughing at the Sight of a Cat


Here’s actor Michael Gough reading Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”.

Ezra Pound on T.S. Eliot: “Mr Eliot is at times an excellent poet and has arrived at the supreme Eminence among English critics largely through disguising himself as a corpse.”

Corpse or hysterical? I suppose it all depended on what mood he was experiencing at the time.

The 10 Day Give

I got an email about this idea, and I think it’s a good one:

“The 10 Day Give is a challenge that is designed to help us get our minds off of ourselves and start thinking about how we can help others.

The thing is, I think most people really want to make other people’s lives better, but with everything going on all around us all hours of the day, we just don’t get a chance. This is an opportunity to choose, on purpose, to give of ourselves. There really are hundreds of opportunities that we overlook each day. My goal is to just grab hold of one of them each day.

For some people that means giving money, for others time is far more precious than money, and for others it may mean their expertise in an area. But, no matter who you are, we all have something to give.

It could be taking someone out to lunch, it could be babysitting for an overworked mom, it can as simple as giving your precious time by taking your mom to the park to talk. There are no rules, no judges, and no right or wrong ways of completing the challenge.

But, I encourage you to sign up for the challenge and decide to give whatever you can – it’s only for 10 days. And who knows, maybe it will become a habit.”

So I signed up, and I encourage you to do the same. I’m going to further make the commitment to try to give anonymously, and then tell you guys about my giving here on the blog. I know that seems contradictory. However, I doubt that the people to whom I’ll be giving read this blog, so I can tell you all as an encouragement to creative giving and still be anonymous to those who need something.

Grow Up, Ms. Pelosi/ Get Real, Mr. Bush

On the way home from taking Betsy-Bee to dance class this afternoon, I heard Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi being interviewed on NPR. Here’s my paraphrase of what she said:

1) This economic crisis and all the bad loans and everything is Bush’s fault —and somehow, by extension, it’s McCain’s fault.

2) Congress bears absolutely no responsibility for the crisis, and we’re not going to anything to resolve it. (That’s almost a direct quote.) Except McCain. Even though he’s a member of Congress, the same Congress that is not responsible for this problem, it’s his fault, and he should have done something to stop it.

3) I don’t know what to do. I didn’t know this crisis was coming. And it’s certainly not my fault. Nobody told me what was going on. I am ignorant and totally not responsible.

4) We Democrats will sit back and watch the country go to h— in a handbasket before we will work with the present administration or with Republicans in Congress to do anything. We might vote for something if you tell us what to do and then give us the credit if it works.

And now McCain is suspending his campaign to go to Washington to try to work with these people who have no interest in working out anything. I think it’s the right thing for him to do, but if The Anchoress is right, it’s also a bad move politically.

I don’t know if the decision is good politics or even if McCain can do anything with such obstructionists as Ms. Pelosi. But I admire him more than I ever did. I think he’s doing what he thinks is right for the country. And Obama says, “Call if you need me.”

By the way, this idea makes sense to me. Go, Dave!

I just listened to President Bush’s address to the nation, and here’s my interpretation of that:

1) I know you don’t want to give a lot of money to banks and rich Wall Street tycoons, and neither do I. But people who know stuff about banks and the economy told me that we have to do it.

2) So I’m reading this stuff about how all this economic crisis stuff happened, and I don’t understand it either. But I’m reading it anyway.

3) If we don’t pump seven hundred mumble, mumble dollars into the economy, then very bad things are going to happen. You might not be able to borrow money, even if you have a good credit rating, and your employer might not be able to borrow money, and you might lose your job.

4) So we, the people, in the form of your elected government, are going to buy all these bad loans that people aren’t paying because they don’t have enough money, and we’re going to hold them until the people do have enough money. Then, we’ll all get our money back, and everyone will live happily ever after.

September 24: National Punctuation Day

For chidren:
Alfie the Apostrophe by Moira Rose Donohue.

Penny and the Punctuation Bee by Moira Rose Donohue.

Punctuation Takes a Vacation by Robin Pulver, illustrated by Lynn Rowe Reed.

Eats, Shoots & Leaves: Why, Commas Really Do Make a Difference by Lynne Truss, illustrated by Bonnie Timmons.

For adults, students and writers:

Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation by Lynne Truss.

A Dash of Style: The Art and Mastery of Punctuation by Noah Lukeman.

War and Reconstruction: Establishing Democracy in Italy and Iraq


I read two books this month about U.S. attempts to establish democracy in a conquered/freed nation. A Bell for Adano by John Hersey won the Pulitzer Prize in 1945. It’s about Major Victor Joppolo, an Italian American officer in the U.S. army who was “more or less the American mayor after our invasion” of Adano a small village in Sicily. Sunrise Over Fallujah is a contemporary young adult novel by Walter Dean Myers about young American soldier, Robin Perry, and his tour of duty in Iraq as a member of a Civil Affairs unit, a sort of put-out-the-fires public relations unit that’s called on to smooth relations with the Iraqi people in special, sometimes ticklish, situations.

The two books, although dealing with similar situations, had completely different atmospheres and a completely different take on war and its aftermath. Operation Iraqi Freedom versus Allied Miitary Government Occupied Territory (AMGOT). In one war, the Americans and their allies are invading an enemy’s country to conquer the fascists and establish democracy, no doubts that democracy is best or that it will work, just confidence and determination to finish a tough job no matter what the obstacles. Maor Joppolo must deal with army bureaucracy and with Italian obfuscation, but he is, as the author tells us from the beginning, “good.” In fact, again according to Mr. Hersey, “there were probably not any really bad men in Amgot, but there were some stupid ones.” Hersey’s American soldiers are more or less well-meaning, sometimes drunk, sometimes selfish, but bumbling toward a trustful relationship with the Italian people who are under their temporary rule in spite of mistakes and because of their essential good nature.

In the other war, the soldiers are confused about their mission, circumscribed and limited in their ability to do anything meaningful, worried about seeming too “gung-ho” and worried about not doing enough, afraid for their lives as they see roadside bombs kill comrades, and finally deceived and betrayed by their own commanders into participating in a deadly game of cat-and-mouse. The Iraqis themselves are very minor characters in Sunrise Over Fallujah; one Iraqi who works for the soldiers at their base is asked what he thinks about the Americans being in his country, but his answer is ambiguous and noncommittal as befits some one who is being paid to work for the U.S. military.

All the Italians, even the “enemy” fascists, in Hersey’s book are somewhat comical and clownish; there’s not much to fear from the former mayor of Adano who can’t even decide if he wants to escape and run to the Germans or stay and be “reconstructed.” And Hersey’s good guys and bad guys are easily distinguished. Myers’ Iraqis are much more shadowy figures, and Robin can’t decide who the enemy is half the time. The issue of trust and whom you can trust in such a foreign land is a continuing problem in in Sunrise. Finally, the soldiers in Iraq in Sunrise Over Fallujah find that they can only trust their buddies, and sometimes not even everyone in their own unit.

In both books a child dies, by accident, at the hands of the Americans. But in A Bell for Adano the accidental death of an Italian child run over by an American military truck results in a new policy for ensuring the safety of the children who run beside the trucks to beg for candy from the AMerican GI’s. Major Joppolo says that the accident is a result of the Americans’ generosity:

“Sometimes generosity is a fault with Americans, sometimes it does harm. It has brought high prices here, and it has brought you misery. But it is the best thing we Americans can bring with us to Europe. So please do not hate the Americans.”

Throughout the book, Major Joppolo is sure that, in spite of mistakes and tragedies, the Americans are in Italy to do good, to defeat the bad guys and lead the Italian civilians to a better life. And the Italians, for the most part, go along with the major’s view of things. They see the AMericans as liberators, and even when mistakes are made, the Italian protest is muted and more mournful than angry.

In Sunrise Over Fallujah, children die as a result of “collateral damage” from an American bombing run, and the protagonist, Robin Perry, also holds a dying Iraqi child in his arms. (I don’t remember the exact circumstances, and I’ve already returned the book to the library.) No one talks about the good intentions of the Americans or tries to explain the tragedies as misplaced American generosity. No one is ever sure that what the Americans are doing or trying to do in Iraq is good or right or better for the Iraqi people.

I tend to believe that war and reconstruction are always much more Fallujah-like (confusing and dangerous) than Adano-like (good-natured and bumbling), but maybe the difference is one of attitude and a crisis of confidence. Was the American military governance of Sicily really more of a farce than a tragedy because the Americans of that generation believed in what they were doing and so made others believe in it, too, even their erstwhile enemies? Can we do the same thing, win hearts and minds, establish democracy, in Fallujah and in Iraq, or are the people of Iraq too foreign, too Muslim, too different, and too dangerous? I’m not there, and I don’t know, but reading these two books in conjunction with one another has made me think. We do live in different world now than my grandparents lived in after WW II, but we are engaged in much the same task as Major Joppolo was in A Bell for Adano. Surely, if we could win Italian hearts and minds in 1945, we can win Iraqi hearts and mind in 2008. It’s just going to take a bunch of Major Joppolos and a great deal of wisdom and restraint on the part of some very young soldiers like Robin Perry.

Just.

A Week in the Woods by Andrew Clements

While reading Mr. Clements’ middle grade fiction title about a school in New Hampshire that has a program called “A Week in the Woods” where all the fifth graders in the school spend a week camping and studying in the wild, I found myself thinking, “Wow! Wouldn’t it be great if homeschoolers could participate in a program like this one! Karate Kid could learn so much from a week in the woods. Yeah, that’s one of the drawbacks to homeschooling. The kids don’t get to take advantage of neat programs like this one.”

Then, I realized how utterly stupid my thoughts were. My kids have been camping numerous times, with Engineer Husband. (I’m not a camping type person.) They studied wildlife and botany with Dad out in the wild of a state park. Because my urchins are homeschooled, Karate Kid takes canoeing on Tuesday mornings. He collected plant specimens all year last year and pressed them into a notebook. He can identify most of the plants along the bayou in Dickinson. (I can’t.) And, as far as I know the school district I live in doesn’t even have a week-in-the-woods program, anyway.

Comparisons are odious. But it’s almost impossible to keep oneself from them. Spunky recently wrote about homeschoolers comparing themselves to each other and to some idealized version of homeschooling. And I found myself this morning, even after twenty years of homeschooling, comparing my homeschool to some idealized program in a fictional public school in New Hampshire. To quote another imperfect homeschooler:

There are no perfect homeschool families. There are no perfect home school mothers. There isn’t a perfect method or curriculum. But there is a perfect God, who takes all this imperfection and somehow turns it into something good. To God be the glory.

I would add that there is no perfect and wonderful public school program that all of us homeschoolers are missing out on. There are just people trying to teach children and finding it rewarding sometimes and difficult sometimes and probably worth all the work and worry in the end. Probably. By God’s grace. No matter where you go to school.

Oh, and by the way, A Week in the Woods is a good story of one boy who went to a public school and met a fine but flawed science teacher and learned a lot. I think you’d enjoy it whether you go to public school, private school, or home school.