Poem #24: Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard by Thomas Gray, 1751

“Read a poem. Taste it. Let it melt over you. Start now.”~Deputy Headmistress at The Common Room

Cindy at Ordo Amoris: “This poem is simply perfection: logos, ethos and pathos.”

The curfew tolls the knell of parting day,
The lowing herd winds slowly o’er the lea,
The ploughman homeward plods his weary way,
And leaves the world to darkness and to me.

Now fades the glimmering landscape on the sight,
And all the air a solemn stillness holds,
Save where the beetle wheels his droning flight,
And drowsy tinklings lull the distant folds:

Save that from yonder ivy-mantled tower
The moping owl does to the moon complain
Of such as, wandering near her secret bower,
Molest her ancient solitary reign.

Beneath those rugged elms, that yew-tree’s shade,
Where heaves the turf in many a mouldering heap,
Each in his narrow cell for ever laid,
The rude Forefathers of the hamlet sleep.

The breezy call of incense-breathing morn,
The swallow twittering from the straw-built shed,
The cock’s shrill clarion, or the echoing horn,
No more shall rouse them from their lowly bed.

For them no more the blazing hearth shall burn,
Or busy housewife ply her evening care:
No children run to lisp their sire’s return,
Or climb his knees the envied kiss to share,

Oft did the harvest to their sickle yield,
Their furrow oft the stubborn glebe has broke;
How jocund did they drive their team afield!
How bow’d the woods beneath their sturdy stroke!

Let not Ambition mock their useful toil,
Their homely joys, and destiny obscure;
Nor Grandeur hear with a disdainful smile
The short and simple annals of the Poor.

The boast of heraldry, the pomp of power,
And all that beauty, all that wealth e’er gave,
Awaits alike th’ inevitable hour:-
The paths of glory lead but to the grave.

Nor you, ye Proud, impute to these the fault
If Memory o’er their tomb no trophies raise,
Where through the long-drawn aisle and fretted vault
The pealing anthem swells the note of praise.

Can storied urn or animated bust
Back to its mansion call the fleeting breath?
Can Honour’s voice provoke the silent dust,
Or Flattery soothe the dull cold ear of Death?

Perhaps in this neglected spot is laid
Some heart once pregnant with celestial fire;
Hands, that the rod of empire might have sway’d,
Or waked to ecstasy the living lyre:

But Knowledge to their eyes her ample page,
Rich with the spoils of time, did ne’er unroll;
Chill Penury repress’d their noble rage,
And froze the genial current of the soul.

Full many a gem of purest ray serene
The dark unfathom’d caves of ocean bear:
Full many a flower is born to blush unseen,
And waste its sweetness on the desert air.

Some village-Hampden, that with dauntless breast
The little tyrant of his fields withstood,
Some mute inglorious Milton here may rest,
Some Cromwell, guiltless of his country’s blood.

Th’ applause of list’ning senates to command,
The threats of pain and ruin to despise,
To scatter plenty o’er a smiling land,
And read their history in a nation’s eyes,

Their lot forbad: nor circumscribed alone
Their growing virtues, but their crimes confined;
Forbad to wade through slaughter to a throne,
And shut the gates of mercy on mankind,

The struggling pangs of conscious truth to hide,
To quench the blushes of ingenuous shame,
Or heap the shrine of Luxury and Pride
With incense kindled at the Muse’s flame.

Far from the madding crowd’s ignoble strife,
Their sober wishes never learn’d to stray;

Along the cool sequester’d vale of life
They kept the noiseless tenour of their way.

Yet e’en these bones from insult to protect
Some frail memorial still erected nigh,
With uncouth rhymes and shapeless sculpture deck’d,
Implores the passing tribute of a sigh.

Their name, their years, spelt by th’ unletter’d Muse,
The place of fame and elegy supply:
And many a holy text around she strews,
That teach the rustic moralist to die.

For who, to dumb forgetfulness a prey,
This pleasing anxious being e’er resign’d,
Left the warm precincts of the cheerful day,
Nor cast one longing lingering look behind?

On some fond breast the parting soul relies,
Some pious drops the closing eye requires;
E’en from the tomb the voice of Nature cries,
E’en in our ashes live their wonted fires.

For thee, who, mindful of th’ unhonour’d dead,
Dost in these lines their artless tale relate;
If chance, by lonely contemplation led,
Some kindred spirit shall inquire thy fate, —

Haply some hoary-headed swain may say,
Oft have we seen him at the peep of dawn
Brushing with hasty steps the dews away,
To meet the sun upon the upland lawn;

‘There at the foot of yonder nodding beech
That wreathes its old fantastic roots so high.
His listless length at noontide would he stretch,
And pore upon the brook that babbles by.

‘Hard by yon wood, now smiling as in scorn,
Muttering his wayward fancies he would rove;
Now drooping, woeful wan, like one forlorn,
Or crazed with care, or cross’d in hopeless love.

‘One morn I miss’d him on the custom’d hill,
Along the heath, and near his favourite tree;
Another came; nor yet beside the rill,
Nor up the lawn, nor at the wood was he;

‘The next with dirges due in sad array
Slow through the church-way path we saw him borne,-
Approach and read (for thou canst read) the lay
Graved on the stone beneath yon aged thorn.’

The Epitaph
Here rests his head upon the lap of Earth
A youth to Fortune and to Fame unknown.
Fair Science frowned not on his humble birth,
And Melancholy marked him for her own.

Large was his bounty, and his soul sincere,
Heaven did a recompense as largely send:
He gave to Misery all he had, a tear,
He gained from Heaven (’twas all he wish’d) a friend.

No farther seek his merits to disclose,
Or draw his frailties from their dread abode
(There they alike in trembling hope repose),
The bosom of his Father and his God.

I bolded my favorite lines, and I agree with others: Thomas Gray’s poem extolling the virtues of the common man is a gem. Wikipedia says, “Gray also wrote light verse, such as Ode on the Death of a Favourite Cat, Drowned in a Tub of Gold Fishes, a mock elegy concerning Horace Walpole’s cat.” I looked that poem up in my Norton anthology, and it’s a dandy, ending with this warning to unheeding cats:

From hence, ye beauties, undeceived,
Know, one false step is ne’er retrieved,
And be with caution bold.
Not all that tempts your wandering eyes
And heedless hearts is lawful prize,
Nor all, that glisters, gold.

I like.

Too Late, Baby

I was reading this post by Doug McKelvey and the comments at The Rabbit Room about the depiction of grace in literature and art, and it led my thinking in a different direction. I started thinking not about grace, but about tragedy and the rejection of grace, redemption, and relationship. I began to think of all the stories, songs, and poetry that make me cry, that draw out my emotional response. Most of them have the theme of redemption not accepted, not pursued, or not completed.

I learned a long time ago that a classic dramatic tragedy ends with the hero’s death, usually as the result of some fatal flaw in his character. A comedy, however, ends with a wedding mirroring the marriage feast of the Lamb and the redemptive, resurrection reuniting of Christ with His church. In the marriage feast, all of the errors and mistakes and even sins of the characters are seen as comedy, errors that lead eventually (by the grace of God) to reconciliation and true relationship. Really, though, a story that ends in the death of the hero (and usually others) can be just a beginning, a first installment, that will ultimately end in resurrection. Or it can be a “too late” story in which the hero dies unredeemed and unrepentant. And a tragedy can end, not with literal death, but with the death of a relationship in a way that shows that it’s too late to resurrect or redeem the relationship. The latter story makes for the most heart-breaking ending. Truth is that it can be too late, too late to get forgiveness, too late to resurrect a broken life or a broken relationship, too late to live. And that is the essence of hell and tragedy.

Some examples of too-lateness that make me want to cry:

“–I see only one hope for our country, and that is when white men and black men, desiring neither power nor money, but desiring only the good of their country, come together to work for it.
He was grave and silent, and then he said sombrely, I have only one great fear in my heart, that one day when they are turned to loving, they will find that we are turned to hating.”

~Cry, the Beloved Country by Alan Paton

“Scarlett, I was never one to patiently pick up broken fragments and glue them together and tell myself that the mended whole was as good as new. What is broken is broken and I’d rather remember it as it was at its best than mend it and see the broken pieces as long as I lived. . . . I wish I could care what you do or where you go but I can’t. . . My dear, I don’t give a damn.” ~Rhett Butler in Gone With the WInd

Saddest movie. No one dies, but the movie is all about the death of relationship.

The king asked the Cushite, “Is the young man Absalom safe?”
The Cushite replied, “May the enemies of my lord the king and all who rise up to harm you be like that young man.”
The king was shaken. He went up to the room over the gateway and wept. As he went, he said: “O my son Absalom! My son, my son Absalom! If only I had died instead of you! O Absalom, my son, my son!”

~2 Samuel 18:32-33 (Saddest story in the Bible)

And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them. ~Romans 1:28-32.

It’s too late, baby, now it’s too late
Though we really did try to make it
Something inside has died and I can’t hide
And I just can’t fake it. ~Carole King

It’s not too late now. But someday it will be. Repent. Return. Believe. Love.

The alternative truly is tragedy and hell.

Poem #23: To My Dear and Loving Husband by Anne Bradstreet, 1678

“If what I do prove well, it won’t advance. They’ll say it’s stolen, or else it was by chance.”~Anne Bradstreet

The first American poet on the list! And not another American until almost 150 years later.

If ever two were one, then surely we.
If ever man were lov’d by wife, then thee;
If ever wife was happy in a man,
Compare with me ye women if you can.
I prize thy love more than whole Mines of gold,
Or all the riches that the East doth hold.
My love is such that Rivers cannot quench,
Nor ought but love from thee, give recompence.
Thy love is such I can no way repay,
The heavens reward thee manifold I pray.
Then while we live, in love let’s so persever,
That when we live no more, we may live ever.

The feminist critics have tried to reinterpret Ms. Bradstreet’s poetry so as to have their female poet and make her a modern feminist, too. She, according to them, wrote of her love and duty to her husband in such glowing terms despite the fact that “Puritan women were expected to be reserved, domestic, and subservient to their husbands. They were not expected or allowed to exhibit their wit, charm, intelligence, or passion.” The fact that Anne Bradstreet does exhibit wit, charm, intelligence, and passion makes her an anomaly. However, I tend to think there was just as much, certainly no less, wit, etc. among Puritan women as there is nowadays among non-Puritanical types. Probably there was more back then, since only those who take God seriously and themselves lightly are able to safely indulge in wit, humor and passion.

Save this poem for Valentine’s Day and give it to your dearly beloved husband, all ye wives of good husbands.

Sister Carrie by Theodore Dreiser

I decided to go ahead and join the Books of the Century Challenge since I read three books from the first year of the century, 1900, while I was reading during Lent. Sister Carrie was published in 1900, but it wasn’t a best seller. In fact it almost didn’t get published at all. The novel was “excoriated by censors” who complained that the the title character, Carrie, was a sinner who seemed to benefit as a result of her fall from moral purity. “Why do the wicked prosper?” And, at least in fiction, according to the mores of the time, they shouldn’t.

At the beginning of the novel Carrie is “eighteen years of age, bright, timid, and full of the illusions of ignorance and youth.” She’s also poor, having only a few clothes and four dollars to her name.

“When a girl leaves her home at eighteen, she does one of two things. Either she falls into saving hands and becomes better, or she rapidly assumes the cosmopolitan standard of virtue and becomes worse.”

By the end of the novel, Carrie is rich, celebrated, famous, and unhappy—but neverthless filled with dreams and longing for beauty and delight.

In between, she stumbles from bad decision to another and wreaks havoc wherever she goes. In particular, Carrie is the ruin of one man who seduces her, and I suppose that the critics complained that for once the man is ruined by an illicit relationship rather than the woman. But Carrie isn’t really a scheming, designing gold digger. She’s a lamb, sort of, pushed into an illicit relationship by poverty, laziness, pride, and vanity. This essential weakness doesn’t justify her actions, but it does explain them.

Some of the situations in the novel were so well described: the slow descent into destitution of an unemployed man, the dissolution by degrees of a loveless marriage, the seduction of a young, vain girl, the enticement of life in the fast lane, and the emptiness of such a life. I thought this aspect of Dreiser’s novel, the realistic depiction of human weakness, was was quite well written. The jacket notes in my book say that critics disagree about the merits of Dreiser’s work. Some think him “the most important realist since Zola.” Others find him unskilled as a writer and his fatalistic view of man, depressing.

Sister Carrie reminds me of Joyce Carol Oates’ them (Semicolon review here), partly because of the Chicago setting, but also because of the cheap, degraded lives of both Oates’s and Dreiser’s characters. However, I found Carrie and her suitors and lovers much more believable and interesting than Oates’s “them”. Carrie may be a drifter and irredeemable by the end of the novel, but Dreiser nails the whole progression of sin and ruination, while Oates’s novel just felt like a rich/middle class girl going slumming. On the other hand, sin does make you stupid, but no one stays quite as innocently obtuse as Carrie does in this book. Maybe we just don’t get to read about the part where Carrie actually wakes up in the pigpen.

The Sixty-Eight Rooms by Marianne Malone

Doesn’t everyone like miniatures? Miniature furniture? Dollhouses? I had no idea that The Art Institute of Chicago had a collection called The Thorne Miniature Rooms:

The 68 Thorne Miniature Rooms enable one to glimpse elements of European interiors from the late 13th century to the 1930s and American furnishings from the 17th century to the 1930s. Painstakingly constructed on a scale of one inch to one foot, these fascinating models were conceived by Mrs. James Ward Thorne of Chicago and constructed between 1932 and 1940 by master craftsmen according to her specifications.

Now I want to go see the miniature rooms. Have any of you been there?

The SIxty-Eight Rooms is a fantasy story for middle grade children (a la Narnia or N.D. WIlson’s 100 Cupboards) about entering into different times and worlds through the rooms in the Thorne Collection. I thought it was great, and it reminded me of so many favorites:

Like the Narnia books, The Sixty-Eight Rooms is about children who find a way into another world, or at least another time in our world.

Instead of 100 cupboards, there are sixty-eight miniature rooms and the worlds they open into, waiting to be explored.

As in the magical books by Edward Eager and E. Nesbit, the magic in The Sixty-Eight Rooms has certain rules that children must figure out as they go along. The magic in these books is something that must be discovered and its rules obeyed if the children want to continue in their adventure. Any Which Wall by Laurel Snyder is another book in this genre.

As in Masterpiece by Elise Broach and Chasing Vermeer and the other art museum fiction books by Blue Balliet, the central setting for the adventure in The SIxty-Eight Rooms is an art museum. Kids can learn a lot about art and artists from all of these books while enjoying a cracking good story at the same time.

Like Claudia and Jamie in the classic From the MIxed-up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler, Jack and Ruthie in The Sixty-Eight Rooms must figure out how to spend the night in the museum without being caught, and they explore some wonderfully luxurious museum rooms, too.

What I’m saying with all of these comparisons is, if you liked any of the above books, authors, or series, you’ll probably enjoy The Sixty-Eight Rooms, too. And it looks as if, judging from the ending of this first book, there will be more books to come about the magic of the Thorne Rooms. The ending, by the way, was satisfactory, but definitely left room for a sequel.

Rainy Day Songs

“Oooh I hear laughter in the rain, walking hand in and with the one I love. Oooh, how I love the rainy days and the happy way I feel inside.”~Neil Sedaka

I love rainy days. So I thought, since it’s a lovely rainy day here in Houston, I’d make up a playlist of rainy day songs for me and for Brown Bear Daughter who also likes rainy days. Here’s what I’ve got so far:

Singin’ in the Rain – Michael Gruber
Laughter In the Rain–Neil Sedaka
Over the Rainbow (From “Wizard of Oz”) –Judy Garland
Raindrops Keep Fallin’ On My Head –B.J. Thomas
Blame It On the Rain–He is We (Courtesy of Brown Bear Daughter)
Grace Like Rain–Todd Agnew
April Showers–Judy Garland
Pennies from Heaven–Bing Crosby
Rainy Days and Mondays –Carpenters
Here Comes That Rainy Day Feeling Again–The Fortunes
Fire and Rain–James Taylor
Five Feet High And Rising–Johnny Cash

Can you think of anything else that I should really add to this playlist? I’d like to have a really good rendition of Showers of Blessing, but I didn’t find anything on iTunes that I was sure I would like.

The Last Summer of the Death Warriors by Francisco X. Stork

Marcelo in the Real World by Francisco X. Stork was one of my favorite reads last year. I loved the story of an autistic young man learning to relate to and live in a complicated world full of fallen people.

The Last Summer of the Death Warriors has the same theme without the autism. As the story begins, Pancho, a seventeen year old orphan, whose only other family member, his sister Rosa, has just died, is headed for the Catholic orphanage St. Anthony’s Home to complete his high school education and his minority. At St. Anthony’s Pancho meets D.Q., a cancer victim and author of The Death Warrior Manifesto. D.Q. talks a lot and writes when he’s not talking. Pancho isn’t much into words; he uses few, reads not at all, and thinks D.Q. is a freak. As the story progresses, the two young men are thrown together in a journey of healing and growth and just living, choosing life in a complicated and death-filled world.

One of the choices D.Q. has to make in the book is whether or not to continue undergo the experimental chemotherapy treatments that his mom desperately wants him to take. The choice is not simple and not really presented as simple. D.Q. wants to live. The chemotherapy makes him sick and unable to think clearly. But it might cure him (probably not). D.Q. wants to live fully for whatever time he has left. It annoyed me a little that he didn’t see the spiritual healer/shaman that his mom also brought into his life in the same terms as the chemotherapy. Yes, Johnny Corazon, the shaman, might cure D.Q. of cancer (very probably not). However, the spiritual confusion and sickness that Corazon’s dubious treatments would also bring into D.Q.’s life were not worth the small possibility that there was something worthwhile and healing in the mix.

Pancho also has choices to make, and although it’s clear from the beginning of the book that Pancho is on the wrong path, it’s not so clear whether or not Pancho will realize his error and choose life instead of death and revenge. Pancho has reason to be angry, but he’s about to ruin his life out of sheer anger and vengeance when he meets D.Q. And nobody can talk Pancho out of his self-destructive course because Pancho isn’t listening to anyone. Pancho is a man of action, not words. He needs healing, too, but doesn’t realize he’s actually sick, sicker than D.Q. who’s dying.

The Last Summer of the Death Warriors is a good story, one that I would recommend to anyone, especially guys, confronting death in their own life or in the life of a friend or relative. It’s also a story about revenge and forgiveness, and on that theme Stork hits all the right notes as far as I’m concerned. Death Warriors will give readers a lot to talk about and process, as well as a good story, and what can one ask from a piece of YA fiction?

Trustee from the Toolroom by Nevil Shute

I discovered Nevil Shute when I was reading books about and set in Australia a couple of years ago. Shute’s A Town Called Alice is justly well-known as an example of Australian flavor.
I also read the most famous of Shute’s books, the apocalyptic On the Beach, which gives a chilling picture of the world slowly dying as a result of a nuclear explosion and the resulting fallout.

I then began to look for more books by Mr. Shute, a popular and prolific author who lived from 1899-1960 and wrote over twenty novels. Shute’s full name was Nevil Shute Norway, and he was a successful aeronautical engineer as well as an author. His novels tend to feature mechanically inclined or engineer-types who are ordinary people sometimes placed in extraordinary circumstances. I would like to read all of the books that Shute wrote, but many of his novels are somewhat difficult to find. On the Beach and A Town Called Alice, maybe because both were made into movies, are readily available, but the others are not to be found in my library system. I looked and you can buy a used paperback copy of Trustee from the Toolroom on Amazon for $30.00. That’s a little rich for my blood. Some of his other novels are a bit more reasonably priced.

So I borrowed Trustee from the Toolroom from a local college library, and it’s unusual enough to be worth tracking down, if you’re looking for a clean, nineteen-fifties, adventure with a common middle class hero. Keith Stewart lives in West Ealing, a suburb of London, and he makes miniature mechanical models–clocks, steamboats, gas engines, locomotives and such– for a living. He also writes about his models for the Miniature Mechanic magazine.

I think my dad would have enjoyed this book. Daddy wasn’t much of a reader, but the details in the book about miniature engineering and about sailing and sailboats would have fascinated him. Mr. Stewart does end up in the midst of an adventure, even though he would seem to be the least likely suspect to become involved in any dangerous exploit. The themes of the book were courage, honor, the influence of steady heroism and everyday reliability, and the importance of the common man. But these themes are not emphasized in a heavy-handed way, just demonstrated as quietly as the fictional Mr. Stewart lives his life.

I suppose to some extent Trustee From the Toolroom is a guy-book, but I enjoyed it. I will admit to skimming some of the technical details of engineering and sailing, but I didn’t miss much. I’m definitely going to keep looking for more books by Nevil Shute Norway. He reminds me of some of my other favorite writers of the mid-twentieth century: Helen MacInnes, Alistair Maclean, even a touch of Rex Stout.

Black Narcissus by Rumer Godden

A coterie of Anglican nuns comes to a remote Himalayan village to establish a convent, school, and hospital for the improvement and benefit of the natives. Instead of making any impression at all on the villagers, the nuns themselves are changed and brought to confront their deepest fears, desires, and inadequacies.

Simple enough to summarize, the novel can be read as simple and somewhat simplistic. When confronted by the great and inscrutable Mysteries of the East, Western Christian minds can only choose to give in and “go native” or be broken by the weight of all that cumulative Eastern wisdom. This truism would probably satisfy many readers of Godden’s novel.

However, it doesn’t satisfy me. I don’t really believe that a “bend or be broken” moral was all that Ms. Godden meant to convey in this novel either. The following conversation between Sister Adela and a Hindu prince that she is tutoring is key:

“Pantheism?” he cried, writing it down delightedly. “And that? How do you spell it and what is it?”
“Saying that God is in everything, animate and inanimate, in the trees and stones and streams.”
“That sounds very beautiful,” he said thoughtfully, “but it certainly isn’t true.”
Sister Adela was surprised. “Why are you so sure?” she asked.
“Because,” he said, “we can conquer trees and streams and stones; we can cut down the forest and dam the stream and break up the stones, but we can’t conquer God.”
“Now he,” he said pointing with his pen, “might very well be in the mountain. We call it Kanchenjungha, and we believe that God is there. No one can conquer that mountain, and they never will. Men can’t conquer God; they only go mad for the love of Him.”

Ms. Godden isn’t advocating mountain worship any more than the psalmist was: “I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills from whence cometh my help.” Rather, the mountain is a symbol, a picture, of the invincibility and yes, the inscrutability of God Himself. When we come face to face with the Eternal we can either give up or go mad. When we recognize our own insignificance and inability to be anything, we can repent and be still or run screaming off the cliff. Job or Job’s wife?

There’s a movie version of Black Naricissus with Deborah Kerr as Mother Superior Clodagh. I’ll probably check it out even though I fear it may be a disappointment. Hollywood isn’t known for making deeply meaningful and subtle spiritual films.

LOST Rehash: Across the Sea

“Mom always liked you best!”–Tommy Smothers

“Expectant moms, let that be a lesson to you: always choose more than one name, just in case.” –via Twitter

“Just because you don’t understand something, that doesn’t mean it’s over your heads. It might just be gibberish.” –also via Twitter

“In Stephen King’s first novel, Carrie, the main protagonist uses her power of Telekinesis to kill her mother, after she had tried to rid Carrie of being possessed by Satan.” –Wikipedia article on matricide.

“In Babylonian legend, the supreme god Marduk slew his mother Tiamet by cutting her in half with a great sword.” –same Wikipedia article

You want answers? Well, this is how we give answers.” –Carlton Cuse on tonight’s episode

“”Every question I answer will simply lead to another question.” –Eve Lady in tonight’s episode

The most significant things about tonight’s episode, even though I don’t know what they mean:

Jacob, the eldest twin, gets a name, but his brother apparently doesn’t. Hey, Brother.

Jacob and MIB are twin brothers.

MIB killed his mother, and she thanked him just before she died.

Jacob sort of killed or transformed or light sabered Brother, and out came Smokey.

Adam and Eve are really Cain and Eve? Or Abel and Eve? Or Esau and Rebekah? Or Marduk and Tiamet? Or none of the above?

We know that Eve says she came from her mother, and we know that Eve lies and kills to protect the Light Source of the Island.

The Light under the island is both good, life-giving and bad, deathly, and dangerous. Is this LIghtSource God, unapproachable and perilous?

I’m really just as confused as ever, but some things that had better be resolved before the end are:

What happens to Desmond, Ben, Richard, Widmore, Penny, Rose and Bernard, Aaron, Ji-what’s her name and probably someone else I’m forgetting?

And especially what happens with Hurley? They had better not kill Hurley on-island or off. They can take whomever they want, but Hurley is off-limits. (By the way, Hurley says “dude” a lot.)

It looks as if Jack will be the new Protector of the Island or of the Light or whatever, and that’s OK, I suppose. It looks like a thankless job to me. However, I repeat, nobody had better mess with Hurley!

The Sideways World is kind of creepy to me. Jack is all perfect and button-down. And Locke is stoically resigned to his fate in the wheelchair, and everybody is just too, too Hollywood with near-perfect lives, or at least better lives than they had in the original world before the plane crashed. But their lives aren’t really better because they’re just mirror images, not real. I think the Sideways World should never have happened, and I wouldn’t mind seeing it undone.

How does the MIB go about re-inhabiting dead bodies? What is the rule for that? Who’s making up the rules now?