Poem: Spring By Betsy Bee

Apr26

Spring

What is the time of year where flowers grow, 
where the sun comes out, and water flows. 
When is the time the birds come out, 
the time of year everybody talks about. 

It has such a wonderful sound, 
It's the time of year leaves don't fall on the ground. 
I never knew it's the best time of year, 
until my grandpa started living here. 
He says " Son now you should know 
the time of year you use the hoes,
because it's when the flowers grow, 
SO pretty now you need to know. 

I'll tell you now but keep it a secret, 
you can't even tell it to the egret. 
The thing i've been telling you is Spring my boy
and that always filled me up with joy. 
And so now you know what i've been saying, 
better go see the dog Huffy baying. 
Oh, yes it's my favorite time of the year, 
have no fear it's spring!  

Friday’s Center of the Blogosphere

Apr25

Nature is an infinite sphere of which the center is everywhere and the circumference nowhere..”
Blaise Pascal

S.M. Hutchens on losing one’s faith: “Experienced pastors, when faced with students who ‘lose their faith’ at college, do not begin to argue back with them on matters philosophical or theological. They inquire into ‘lifestyle’ issues in the attempt to ascertain whether there is a release to be gained from overthrowing the faith in which they were raised. There usually is.”

I could lose my sanity, not my faith, if I followed many links like this one: Virtual Bubble Wrap. I got the link from Mrs. Dani, so blame her.

In much more serious news, The Headmistress at The Common Room has been blogging the heck out of the travesty of justice that is taking place in my old hometown of San Angelo, Texas. Just go there and find the posts, and you’ll read what I think about what CPS is doing to 300+ children and their mothers. I’m mostly worried about the children. CPS says they are, too, but I don’t believe it.

Gracious Hospitality collects Teatime Recipes this week. I’m planning to host a book club tea at my house soon, so I will definitely be looking over these recipes. There’s a linky there to add a link to your favorite recipe, too.

This collection of links was all over the map from the mundane to the silly to the serious and discerning. Take it for what it’s worth, and don’t get stuck popping the virtual bubble wrap for too long.

LOST Rehash: The Shape of Things To Come

Apr25

What I asked:
Why can’t Ben kill Widmore, or vice-versa?

What rules (whose rules) did Widmore violate when his henchman killed Alex? These people live by rules?

Where is Penelope now, and why wouldn’t Ben be able to find her? Is Desmond with her?

Who killed the doctor? And could it be that the doctor really is fine, back on the boat in the past? But the “time warp” made it seem like the Boat People are lying? And made Faraday try to lie?

Why is Ben so attached to Alex since he really isn’t her dad? He doesn’t seem to care about anyone else. Why Alex? Because he raised her? Did he really steal her from Rousseau? Why? Why were Ben’s people taking children in the first place? To replace the surplus population?

And what’s going on at that “temple” with Little Richard and the rest of Ben’s people? And the kids they stole?

How does Ben end up in the Sahara? What is that “thang” Ben used to take out the Bedouins? Whatever it is, he knows how to use it, and it’s lethal.

Wasn’t C.S. Lewis in the desert of Tunisia when we first met her? I can’t remember what it was she found there. Something with a Dharma logo?

Who is Jacob, and why do Ben and Locke have to pay him a visit? Yeah, I know, so that Jacob can tell them what to do next. Why? Why is Hurley the only one who can find Jacob’s cabin now?

Is Locke a total dork? Answer: yes.

Why can’t Widmore find the island in 2005? He seems to have done so once; why not again?

Why did They kill Nadia? What did she have to do with anything? Maybe Ben had her killed just to get Sayid on his team. Ben has an evil smile.

What will happen to my now-favorite characters: Miles, Daniel Faraday, and C.S. Lewis? Oh, I hope, hope, hope, nobody kills them. Even if Faraday is a bad liar.

What I liked:
Bernard knows Morse code. I like Bernard and Rose. I may be the only one who does, but I have a soft spot for both of them.

Sawyer and Hurley playing RISK. Who won that game? I guess it was interrupted.

Hurley’s taking the servant-leadership position again. “Guys, just put down the guns.”

Sawyer’s an old softie. “If you harm one hair on that curly head . . .” I think we can expect Sawyer to do something really cold and self-centered soon just to balance out the the mush. ‘Cause he’s Sawyer, and he can’t allow anyone to think he’s going soft.

Moriarty? Sherlock Holmes’s nemesis, an arch-criminal, head of vast crime syndicate. That’s Ben. (Kerouac also has a character named Dean Moriarty in his book, On the Road, but I prefer A. Conan Doyle’s Moriarty.) However, if we’re going to have to choose between being on Ben’s side or Widmore’s side, I say, “A plague on both their houses.”

Predictions:
Jack will not die of appendicitis.

Claire will die soon. She’s acting kind of like a zombie lately, anyway.

Desmond and Penny will not be reunited because Desmond doesn’t have very good luck.

Sawyer and Locke will fight a civil war over control of the island as soon as The Oceanic Six leave, however they leave.

Faraday and Hurley ought to become friends, but they might kill Faraday off. Which would be sad. Because I like him almost as much as I like Hurley.

I’m glad LOST is back.

Christians and the New Media

Apr24

As communication theorist Marshall McLuhan argued, the tools we use to communicate a message can shape that message in ways we may or may not intend. If this is true then Christians have a duty to critically evaluate the effect of our media choices on our message. Do our choices of media forms allow the message to remain Christian? Or are the tools with which we communicate at odds with the message of the Gospel? If the medium affects the message, how will the Christian message be affected by the new media?

A response to the Evangelical Outpost Symposium sponsored by Wheatstone Academy.

Media? Message? What?

After reading this explanation of Mr. McLuhan’s famous dictum, I am only somewhat less confused. If the “new media” we’re talking about are cell phones, the internet, ipods and whatever else is out there that I’m not hip enough to know about, and the message is whatever the use of these media is implanting into our subliminal culture, then certainly these new media are not inherently Christian and are not preaching the gospel as an intrinsic media-borne message. However, I’m not sure I see that the new media are distorting the gospel either.

One element of the gospel is the building of Christian community. Jesus said that Christians were to be the Church, a community of disciples, praying together, learning together, and worshipping together. The internet, like television and even radio before it, can be a somewhat self-indulgent and isolating addiction. But it doesn’t have to be. Just as we can isolate ourselves from real community by spending too much time in front of a TV screen or a computer screen, we can also connect with others, especially via the internet, in ways that were not possible even ten years ago. If the Christian brothers and sisters I meet via the internet become my church to the exclusion of a real physical church community, then the medium of the internet has twisted and limited my understanding of what a true Christian community is meant to be. If the information and the encouragement that I get from others, blogs and forums and such like, become an adjunct to the community I experience and cause me to care not just about my immediate community, but also about the world and the Church around the world, then the underlying message of the internet is helpful and supportive to the cause of Christ.

Christians don’t control the internet any more than they control the publishing industry, and we shouldn’t aspire to do so. We can learn to effectively use the media—blogging, podcasting, music making, text-messaging, etc,—to communicate the most important message of all, the message of John 3:16 to a multitude of lost, hopeless people around the world. And as long as we remain “as wise as serpents and harmless as doves” and discern the limitations of the media we use, we can see these new media as a gift. When have we ever been closer to the day when the gospel of Jesus Christ would truly be preached “throughout the world?”

So I’m not sure I agree with McLuhan’s formulation in the first place. The medium carries a message of its own, yes. Television can cause us to focus on the visual to the exclusion of the other sensory apparatus that also receive communication. The internet can isolate and appeal to a limited attention span. However, the media, new and old, also carry the messages that the communicators put into their music, photographs, moving pictures, speeches, written words, and other forms of communication. And Christians, although we should be aware of the inherent limitations and distortions that accompany any given medium, need not fear that the message of the good news of the love of God through Christ will be lost in the messages of the new media, any more than it was garbled and made ineffectual by the printing press or the telegraph.

NPM: Birthday of the Bard

Apr23

“From you have I been absent in the spring,
When proud-pied April dress’d in all his trim
Hath put a spirit of youth in every thing,
That heavy Saturn laugh’d and leap’d with him.
Yet nor the lays of birds nor the sweet smell
Of different flowers in odour and in hue
Could make me any summer’s story tell,
Or from their proud lap pluck them where they grew;
Nor did I wonder at the lily’s white,
Nor praise the deep vermilion in the rose;
They were but sweet, but figures of delight,
Drawn after you, you pattern of all those.
Yet seem’d it winter still, and, you away,
As with your shadow I with these did play.”
– William Shakespeare, Sonnet 98

Shakespearean resources from last year’s Shakespeare birthday post.

Poet of the Day: Wm. Shakespeare, of course.
11 poetry activities for today:
1. Read some Shakespeare in the original version.
2. Read Shakespeare in a modern English version.
3. Watch a play. Shakespeare Movies for the Family from Higher Up and Further In.
4. Memorize some of your favorite lines from Shakespeare.
5. Check out the Mental Multivitamin Bardolatry archives.
6. Find a live performance of one of Shakespeare’s plays to attend with your family.
7. Write or read a sonnet.
8. Read a biography or a historical nonfiction book about Shakespeare and his times.
9.Have some fun with Macbeth.
10. Answer these questions for a Shakespearean meme.

For a little humor, you might like this poem by Don Marquis about Shakespeare’s thwarted ambitions:

pete the parrot and shakespeare.

Pompeii and the Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius

Apr21

In 79 AD, on August 24, the volcano Vesuvius, erupted on the unsuspecting Roman town of Pompeii. It came as such a great shock to the people who lived there because the volcano had been silent for centuries up until that fateful day.
The residents of Pompeii attempted to get out of the town and away from the violently erupting volcano. They grabbed their most treasured possessions, most of which were precious pieces of jewelry. Some doctors saved their medical tools. All of them fled, but not many got far. Many of these artefacts were not found until around 1748, when the city Pompeii was rediscovered.
Some of the remains of people who died in the eruption have been preserved and put in museums. I went to an exhibit today called Pompeii: Tales from an Eruption. I thought it was tragic and awful that all those people died, but I also thought it was interesting.

Fiction about Pompeii:

Meme: Five Twentieth Century Works of Transcendent Beauty

Apr21

Mark Olson at PsuedoPolymath, in his 3000th post, has challenged bloggers to name five works of transcendent beauty produced during the last century. Since beauty does exist alongside horror, Mr. Olson suggests that we name and remember the beauties of our century, lest we forget. Here are mine, off the top of my head:

1. The works of J.R.R. Tolkien

2. Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue, and other works.

3. These windows by Marc Chagall.

4. “I Have a Dream,” a speech by Martin Luther King Jr.

5. The Green Revolution.

There are probably dance, architecture, design, science, technology and sports works and moments that could be added to this list, but I’m not so familiar with those areas of human endeavor.

The 20th century gave us much that was not beautiful such as the Killing Fields, Auschwitz, Holodomor, Stalingrad, and that list continues much too far. However, every age has beauty to claim as its own. Doestoevsky claimed that ‘beauty would save the world.’ In this vein it seems imperative that we remark and remember beauty that is in our midst.”

Thanks, Mark, good idea.

Vanity, Vanity, All Is Vanity

Apr21

Christianity for Modern Pagans, ch. 5: Vanity.

Pascal: “Anyone who wants to know the full extent of man’s vanity has only to consider the causes and effects of love. The cause is a je ne sais quoi. And it’s effects are terrifying. This indefinable something, so trifling that we cannot recognize it, upsets the whole earth, princes, armies, the entire world. Cleopatra’s nose: if it had been shorter the whole face of the earth would have been different.”

Kreeft: “No psychologist, to this day, has ever explained why Romeo falls in love with Juliet. Yet this is literally a matter of life or death. Let us pray that no one ever will explain it.”

There were other girls in the ballroom when Romeo first saw Juliet. Why her? Why are you married to your husband or wife instead of some other woman or man? Chance? Pheromones? Predestination? Does that online dating service whose name I can’t remember really have x number of “compatibility factors” infallibly figured and matched to find you the perfect mate? I doubt it.

First, there’s an attraction, physical and spiritual/mental. Ideas mesh; bodies feel. Then there must be a commitment, an act of the will. A woman says, “I love this man and forsaking all others, I will cling only to him.” Love is somethng you feel, but to become lasting, it becomes something you do, acting in love whether you feel it or not.

However, Pascal is right. None of the preceding paragraph explains completely why I chose Engineer Husband. Perhaps I chose him because he was attracted to me, but that answer begs the question: why was he attracted to me? And what if he had not been?

For want of a nail, the shoe was lost,
For want of the shoe, the horse was lost,
For want of the horse, the rider was lost,
For want of the rider, the battle was lost,
For want of the battle, the kingdom was lost,
And all for the want of a nail!

Read more about the source of this nursery rhyme on vanity and chance (or lack of foresight according to Ben Franklin) here.

Pascal’s point is that mighty events turn on small and seemingly inconsequential choices. Kreeft concludes, “If there is no God, we easily become determinists.” Or anarchic nihilists.

LOST Returns: Next Thursday

Apr16

While I was watching the first half of season four of LOST I was taking a blog break for Lent, so there were no weekly LOST posts here at Semicolon. Now, in honor of the return of LOST in just one week, I thought I’d share some of my thoughts on the first eight episodes of the season.

It seems that each of the Oceanic Six, except baby Aaron, has entered into his own personal nightmare. Each one has become what he least wanted to be. Jack is an alcoholic, drug-addicted, suicidal, washed-up surgeon just like his father. Hurley’s back in the mental hospital, talking to dead people, and acting paranoid. And he hasn’t lost any weight either. (Just because you’re paranoid, it doesn’t necessarily mean They aren’t out to get you.) Kate is trapped in a Monica-like life with a child for whom she’s responsible and a court settlement that restricts her movements. She can’t go anywhere, and she certainly can’t run anymore. She’s also trapped inside a lie that makes her out to be a heroine, and she can’t tell the truth or she’ll lose the baby and maybe more than that. Sun has lost her husband, the one person she’s spent the entire island-time trying to hang onto. Sayid’s become a contract assassin, working for Ben, of all people. Sayid said in the third episode of season four that the day he started believing Ben would be the day he “sold his soul.” It looks as if Jack, Hurley, Kate, Sun, and Sayid have all lost their souls, their identities, the essential character that vindicated each of them on the island.

Hurley has a sudden talent for deception. Before they went Through the Looking Glass, Hurley couldn’t keep a secret and couldn’t lie his way out of a paper bag. In episode three, Hurley manages to deceive Sayid, the Human Lie Detector and betray him to Locke. How did Hurley become a deceptive Judas in league with Locke? And Sayid, on the other hand, didn’t even know at first that his girlfriend in Berlin was a liar and an enemy. He’s lost his ability to detect lies and regained his talent for torture and murder. Jack’s no longer a leader; even Kate won’t follow him when he tells her they need to go back to the island. Since when did Kate not follow Jack into the jungle at a moment’s notice?

Have they sold their souls, their integrity, to their rescuers for a mess of pottage?

Stay tuned next week. Same LOST time; same LOST station.