Author Celebration: Alexandre Dumas, pere

I missed last week’s celebration on the July 17th, the birthday of Isaac Watts, because of my blog issues. (Nasty old spammers!) However, I am just barely here in time to celebrate with you all the birthday today, July 24th, of Alexandre Dumas, French playwright and novelist who was born in 1802 and died December 5, 1870 at the age of 68. His grandmother on his father’s side was an Afro-Carribbean former slave, and his father was a general in Napoleon’s army who fell into disfavor and poverty. Alexandre’s father the general died when Alexandre was three years old, and his widowed mother tried to give him an education. He loved books and read everything he could.

Tous pour un, un pour tous, c’est notre devise.
Translation: All for one, one for all, that is our motto.
The Three Musketeers, Ch. 9: D’Artagnan Shows Himself

Dumas moved to Paris when he was twenty (similar to D’Artagnon), and he began to write plays and magazine articles. His first plays were quite successful, and he soon began writing novels in serieal form for the newspapers. He eventually became so popular that “Dumas became known as the King of Paris and a saying held that, ‘when Dumas snores, Paris turns in its sleep.'”

He hired a stable of writers and assistants who helped him turn out novel after novel in addition to a prolific number or journal articles and nonfiction books on crime and French history and politics. His most famous novels are The Three Musketeers and its sequel Twenty Years After, The Count of Monte Cristo and The Man in the Iron Mask.

How can we celebrate the birthday of this very popular author, perhaps the most widely read French author of all time?

1. Start reading one of his novels. I’m planning to check out Dumas’s Le Reine Margot, which purports to tell the story of Marguerite de Valois, the daughter of the infamous Catherine de’ Medici and King Henry II of France.

2. Listen to Tchaikovsky’s The Nutcracker. The story of The Nutcracker and the Mouse King was written by E. T. A. Hoffmann. Alexandre Dumas’ adaptation of the story was set to music by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky.

3. Teacher notes for The Three Musketeers.

4. Enjoy a Three Musketeers bar.

5. Watch a movie based on one of Alexandre Dumas’ books. Dumas’ works have inspired more than 200 films. I recommend:

The Three Musketeers (1973) with Raquel Welch, Oliver Reed, Richard Chamberlain, and Michael York. The newer one (1993) with Kiefer Sutherland and Chris O’Donnell is OK, but I like the old one better. Oliver Reed will always be my image of Athos.

The Count of Monte Cristo (2002). The story’s better than the movie, but the movie’s not bad. Rated PG-13.

6. Play Three Musketeers. Have an adventure. All for one and one for all. Do kids pretend such things anymore?

7. Make a musketeer costume.

8. Teacher activities for The Count of Monte Cristo.

Do you have anything to say about Alexandre Dumas or his books? Share a link here for his birthday celebration.

1. Nick Pelling (The Dumas Club)
2. Barbara H. (The Count of Monte Cristo)
3. Becky (The Three Musketeers)
4. SuziQoregon (The Three Musketeers)

Powered by… Mister Linky’s Magical Widgets.

Meta-Blogging Blog Recovery

I’m back. If you didn’t notice I was gone for the last week and a half, please know that I did. Notice, that is.

As far as we can tell, someone hacked into my blog and caused it to use a lot more CPU on the server than it should, which in turn shut the whole thing down. I could get the front page to load, sometimes, but couldn’t get to the pages where you post or any other pages for that matter. When it looked as if my blogging days were coming to an abrupt halt since the webhost people couldn’t fix the problem and Computer Guru Son didn’t know what to do, I was rather unhappy and sad.

At first, I wondered if I was too attached to blogging. Maybe the crash of my blog was a sign that I should step back, reevaluate, and give up blogging gracefully. However, as I thought and prayed (yes, prayed) about it some more, I realized that my blog is an aspect of my work. I feel called to blog about books, and ideas, and faith and the intersection of those areas of life. I’m under no illusions that what I say here is going to “change the world”, but I am called to be faithful in small things. And this blog is one of my small things.

So, I am very thankful todayto Mr. Bill of Thinklings and Out of the Bloo who helped me to figure out what was wrong and then fix it. He deserves a medal, but for now all I have to give him is a great big THANK YOU.

Hooray! Later today we celebrate Alexander Dumas, author of The Three Musketeers and other great adventure stories. And on Saturday, the Saturday Review is back and running . . . the Good Lord willing and the creek don’t rise.

Jayber Crow by Wendell Berry

Where have I been, and why haven’t I read any novels by Wendell Berry before? Why hasn’t this man, Wendell Berry, won a Pulitzer Prize or something? He writes about real people, the kind of people I knew growing up in West Texas, even though his people are in a fictional place called Port William, Kentucky. His people say things and talk about things that I heard growing up, like:

filling stations
the jumping-off place
finicky
I reckon
sick as a dog
minnnow buckets
toe the mark

And Mr. Jayber Crow is one of the most thoughtful characters I’ve read about in any book. He’s a homespun philosopher, and better yet, a loving man.

And this is what is was like—the words were just right there in my mind, and I knew they were true: ‘the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God move upon the face of the waters.’ I’m not even sure that I can tell you what was happening to me then, or that I know even now. At the time I surely wasn’t trying to tell myself. But after all my years of reading in that book and hearing it read and believing and disbelieving it, I seemed to have wandered my way back to the beginning—not just of the book, but of the world—and all the rest was yet to come. I felt knowledge crawl over my skin.”

That last sentence, can’t you just feel it, too? I really had an experience somewhat like Jayber’s myself when I was about thirteen years old. I wondered if all I had been taught and all the Bible knowledge I had memorized was really true. I thought and prayed for an entire Sunday afternoon, by myself in the churchyard, and at a point I just knew. No audible voice, but I knew that God was there, that He was the Christ, that the Holy Spirit spoke to me.

“And I knew that the Spirit that had gone forth to shape the world and make it live was still alive in it. I just had no doubt. I could see that I lived in the created world, and it was still being created. I would be part of it forever. There was no escape. The Spirit that made it was in it, shaping it and reshaping it, sometimes lying at rest, sometimes standing up and shaking itself, like a muddy horse, and letting the pieces fly. I had almost no sooner broke my leash than I had hit the wall.”

I have come to the age now where I can see how short a time we have to be here. And when I think about it, it can seem strange beyond telling that this particular bunch of us should be here on this little patch of ground in this little patch of time, and I can think of other times and places I might have lived, other kinds of man I might have been. But there is something else. There are moments when the heart is generous, and then it knows that for better or worse our lives are woven together here, with one another and with the place and all the living things.

Jayber Crow is a book about community and about the secret life of a Kentucky bachelor and about love that is love even when it’s unconsummated. Mr. Berry has an axe to grind in his antipathy for modern farming and agri-business, but he also has a story to tell about the goodness of country life back in the 1930’s and 40’s. And there’s another, deeper theme to this book, about the surprising twists and turns of a life lived for an audience of One, lived before God, even in the times when God seems to be far away.

“Nearly everything that has happened to me has happened by surprise. All the important things have happened by surprise. And whatever has been happening usually has already happened before I have had time to expect it. The world doesn’t stop because you are in love or in mourning or in need of time to think. And so when I thought I was in my story or in charge of it, I really have been only on the edge of it, carried along. Is this because we are in an eternal story that is happening partly in time?”

An eternal story that is happening partly in time. What a great description of the sense that we have that we are somehow trapped in time but not meant to be there, mortal but meant to be immortal.

I also read Hannah Coulter a couple of weeks ago, and I’ll just say that I’m hooked. I think you might be, too, if you try either of the two books I’ve just finished. Port William, Kentucky is a place I want to visit again and yet again; I might even like to settle down there, even if I am a city girl at heart. Mr. Berry makes country life sound awfully enticing.

Mere Comments on the News

S.M. Hutchens on education: Maieusis, the work of midwives, involves knowledge and opinion about the process and what its ends are. Those who practice it must understand what is normal and desirable, know error or anomaly, and take steps to correct it with as much force as is required to accomplish the right end. The teacher’s task, to be sure, is essentially that of a guide and encourager, but to do this he must know the path to be taken, and equally, what is not the path, and is to be discouraged. His knowledge of his subject is not to be imparted or simply transferred as much as put forward for the advantage of the learner–who is to make of it what he can, and may be examined by the master on that making, the examination, ideally, being for the master’s learning as well as the student’s.

Anthony Esolen on conservatism and so-called homosexual marriage: When a high court overthrows over two millennia of western tradition, all English common law, and the express will of the people, to engage in an unheard of experiment touching upon the most intimate matters of human society — marriage and the family — and when the people supinely put up with it, at best hoping to tweak the decision or overturn it in some vainly hoped-for election, then it is not the case that civic liberty will soon be lost. It already has been lost. Quit looking at the ephemeral! Your forefathers rebelled over a few high-handed taxes without parliamentary representation. They and their descendants for a hundred and fifty years would have tarred and feathered the silly members of that court, denouncing them as fools and tyrants, and putting them back in their place.

Celebration Reminder

cooltext92322612

Please note that the third installment in the Semicolon Author Celebration Series takes place on Thursday, July 17th, as we celebrate the birthday of musician and poet Isaac Watts. If you have something, anything, to say about Mr. Watts, please write it up and bring your link to the party on the 17th.

Here’s a little preview from a past post.

Would that be a retro-preview?

The Sunday Salon: Ruminating and Rambling

The Sunday Salon.com

I just joined Sunday Salon this week, and I’m planning to use it as an opportunity to think about what I’ve been reading and watching and studying for the week, maybe figuring how my “media intake” has influenced my thoughts and decisions and what I might want to do in response to what God is teaching me.

I watched a couple of movies this week: Becoming Jane, the fictional story of author Jane Austen’s doomed courtship with an entangled and ultimately unavailable young man, and Finding Neverland, the somewhat fictionalized story of author James Barrie’s doomed and irresponsible courtship of a widow and mother of four boys. I’ve seen the second movie before, and I reviewed it here. I was not quite as disturbed by Finding Neverland this second time as I was the first; I had more hope that J.M. Barrie would do the right thing and grow up for the sake of his young friends. There is a theme that runs through both movies of taking responsibility, self-sacrifice, and romantic dreams being subordinated to duty. Those are not easy lessons to make palatable on film in this day and age of self-actualization, irresponsibility, and romantic delusion. So I applaud both movies for the attempt.

I’ve also finished Jayber Crow by Wendell Berry, and I find that I want think about that book a bit more before I write much about it. I started reading The Deadliest Monster: An Introduction to Worldviews by J.F. Baldwin, an examination of currently popular worldviews and a comparison of those philosophies to the Christian view of life. Baldwin uses Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein monster and R.L. Stevenson’s Mr. Hyde as icons of two opposing worldviews: Mr. Hyde represents the Christian idea of original (innnate) sin and the necessity of God’s grace for salvation, and Frankenstein’s monster typifies the belief that men are only monsters because of their environment and influences and can perfect (save) themselves by their own efforts and good works.

Baldwin reminded me that none of us is truly able to perfect or redeem ourselves, that our own hearts are deceptive, and that we are all sinners in need of the mercy of God. And I have need of such reminders since I ruefully saw myself in these words from the book:

“As we grow in our faith, the little light bulb comes on that says, ‘Hey, Christ really meant it when he called himself the Way, the Truth, and the Life. Christianity really is true, and the rest of the world really is deceived!’ And then, unfortunately, a prideful voice whispers, ‘Aren’t I perceptive to see that Christianity is true and that every other worldview is bankrupt? I am one smart monkey.’ If we listen to this whisper, we allow ourselves to be deceived into thinking that we somehow rescued ourselves by being clever enough to see the truth.”

AH, yes, clever me, saved by grace and smart enough to do God a favor by recognizing His favor! If only that miserable tax collector were like me!

God, forgive us our pride and help us to see ourselves for the monsters we are apart from Him.

Exit Lines

American Book Review picks their 100 Best Last Lines from novels.

I’ve posted here before about first lines, but not about closing lines. My favorites from the ABR list:

5. But I reckon I got to light out for the Territory ahead of the rest, because Aunt Sally she’s going to adopt me and sivilize me and I can’t stand it. I been there before. –Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1885)

8. It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known. –Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities (1859)

57. “All that is very well,” answered Candide, “but let us cultivate our garden.”
–Voltaire, Candide (1759; trans. Robert M. Adams)

77. Tomorrow, I’ll think of some way to get him back. After all, tomorrow is another day. –Margaret Mitchell, Gone with the Wind (1936)

There were others that read pretty well, but I hadn’t read the books they came from and so couldn’t be sure that they meant what I thought they meant.

Can you guess which books end with each of these famous lines?

1. He drew a deep breath. “Well, I’m back,” he said.

2. And there they died upon a Good Friday for God’s sake.

3. So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.

4. Now at last they were beginning Chapter One of the Great Story, which no one on earth has read; which goes on forever; in which every chapter is better than the one before.

5. He knelt by the bed and bent over her, draining their last moment to its lees; and in the silence there passed between them the word which made all clear.

The end. At last. An essay on last lines from The Telegraph.

Don’t Talk To Me About the War by David A. Adler

Thirteen year old Tommy Duncan isn’t interested in the news from Europe, news of war. It’s May, 1940, and it just might be the year the Brooklyn Dodgers win the series. And that’s the kind of news that interests Tommy. His friend, Beth, however, talks about the war in Europe all the time, and Tommy doesn’t understand half of what she’s talking about. But he still likes her a lot, even if she does try to get him to read the war news with her when they meet at Goldman’s Coffee Shop to walk to school together.

Tommy and his friends are seventh graders, but they act and feel younger. I think that’s because the story is set in 1940, before the U.S. entered World War II. Even though the kids in the story seem younger than thirteen in some ways, the story feels right, maybe because children didn’t take on a psuedo-sophistication as young as kids do now. They did take on responsibility, however. Tommy’s friend, Beth, does all the cooking and shopping for her family because her mother is dead. And Tommy takes more and more responsibility as the story progresses because his mother is dealing with a mysterious illness that makes her more and more dependent on Tommy and his dad.

The voices of the kids, especially Tommy the narrator, work well and help to set the story in another era. But today’s thirteen year olds and older may become impatient with Tommy and his straightforward way of thinking and talking and behaving. There’s not a lot of nuance or worldly sophistication here. I found it refreshing.

Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus by Mary Shelley

Prometheus, for those of us who have forgotten our Greek mythology, was a “Titan known for his wily intelligence, who stole fire from Zeus and gave it to mortals for their use. He was then punished for his crime by Zeus.”

In Mary Shelley’s novel, Victor Frankenstein steals, not fire, but the secret of life from no one, from the dark recesses of natural science; God does not appear in Shelley’s story. Shelley’s Prometheus/Frankenstein is a misguided soul who unleashes upon the world a monster so horrible that he has no name. At first, the monster provokes some sympathy; he is shunned by all who see him because of his hideous physical appearance. But the monster, or demon as Frankenstein calls him, soon forfeits all our pity by becoming a murderer and a wholly vindictive, malevolent creature.

Then, as the story progresses, Frankenstein himself becomes a monster, full of revenge and determined to destroy his creation. The lines between good and evil, between creature and creator are blurred. Mary Shelley may have intended the novel as a critique of the Industrial Revolution, a la Rousseau, but in the end there is not much basis to choose between Frankenstein and his monster. Frankenstein starts out with good intentions. The monster supposedly starts out as an innocent, loving, but horrifyingly ugly, creature. Both are warped by events and changed into ghastly fiends.

For Mary Shelley, the creator bears responsibility for sin and evil in his creature. Yet, the novel never gives an alternative. Frankenstein wishes many times that he had never created his monster, but he never envisions the possibility of having created a different kind of creature, one that is incapable of evil choices, probably realizing that such a creature would not be human-like but rather a mere robot. Nor does Frankenstein try to redeem his creation, turn it to good, and never does he even consider forgiveness as a response to the monster’s evil actions. Frankenstein writhes and struggles in his own awful responsibility, and he dreams of revenge. In the end, Victor Frankenstein is no victor at all; even his revenge is thwarted and unfulfilled.

Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein at a very young age. She was only 21 years old when it was published anonymously in London in 1818. This first edition of the book had an unsigned preface written by Mary’s lover/then husband, the poet Percy Shelley. Perhaps Mary Shelley had some regrets of her own that were being worked out in written form. She ran away with the married Shelley when she was only sixteen and then married him after his first wife committed suicide. After Mr. Shelley’s death in a boating accident in 1822, Mary Shelley wrote these words to a friend: “Well here is my story – the last story I shall have to tell – all that might have been bright in my life is now despoiled – I shall live to improve myself, to take care of my child, & render myself worthy to join him. Soon my weary pilgrimage will begin – I rest now – but soon I must leave Italy.”

She sounds a lot like her creation, Victor Frankenstein, who entered into study and scientific experimentation with great hopes, but found his life “despoiled” and a “weary pilgrimage.”

Poetry and Fine Art Friday

“A poem is so brief. It’s not a practical thing like buying a loaf of bread. A poem is like a seed that can grow and enlarge in your mind. Poetry has become such an integral part of culture around the world. It’s one of the few things that is not pragmatic, perhaps, that speaks to the intuition and imagination, and it’s not linear. It takes a leap of understanding. It gives us a different dimension to our believing and our understanding.”
Luci Shaw in an interview with Washington Times reporter Jen Waters

I don’t know if this poem “takes a leap of understanding.” Brown Bear Daughter, age thirteen, wrote this poem after a trip to the beach.

Beach by M. Early

Toes in the sand

Staring up

Staring down

Sinking slowly

Sinking down

Looking over

Blue waves are white,

On fire by the moonlight

It’s an iridescent, glowing peace.

And this Edvard Munsch painting may not be exactly what Brown Bear was writing about, but it’s close . . . and beautiful.

Summer Night at the Beach




Summer Night at the Beach

Art Print

Munch, Edvard


Buy at AllPosters.com