The End of the Alphabet, Wit, and John Donne

On a Friday night in February (during my blog break) while my ten year old daughter, Betsy-Bee was celebrating her birthday with a bevy of giggling friends in the living room watching Princess Diaries II, I watched the movie Wit in my bedroom, mostly alone. Wit tells the story of a forty-something college English professor, a specialist in the poetry of John Donne, who is told that she has stage-4 ovarian cancer. As Professor VIvian Bearing tells us later, in an aside, there is no stage-5.

Much of the movie, based on a play by Margaret Edson, is made up of the monologue narration of Ms. Bearing, as she tells the viewer of the indignities, pain and suffering that make up her journey through chemotherapy and cancer and eventually into death. As you can imagine, there are many poignant asides and scenes that are quite difficult to watch. Actress Emma Thompson plays the part of Vivian Bearing, and she is amazing. Engineer Husband saw pieces of the movie as he came in and out of our room, and he said she deserved an Academy Award. I agree.

The movie itself, especially Ms. Thompson’s performance, which really was the movie, was morbidly fascinating and difficult to watch. The way that Ms. Bearing interacted with the poetry of John Donne in her struggle with death and dying made the movie a rich and thoughtful experience. It’s rated PG-13 for “thematic elements”, and I would agree that it’s not for the young and/or faint of heart.

DEATH be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadfull, for, thou art not so,
For, those, whom thou think’st, thou dost overthrow,
Die not, poore death, nor yet canst thou kill me.
From rest and sleepe, which but thy pictures bee,
Much pleasure, then from thee, much more must flow,
And soonest our best men with thee doe goe,
Rest of their bones, and soules deliverie.
Thou art slave to Fate, Chance, kings, and desperate men,
And dost with poyson, warre, and sicknesse dwell,
And poppie, or charmes can make us sleepe as well,
And better then thy stroake; why swell’st thou then;
One short sleepe past, wee wake eternally,
And death shall be no more; death, thou shalt die.
~John Donne, 1572-1631

After I watched the movie and put the birthday partiers to sleep with threats and charms and poppies, I picked up a small book from my library basket, a novella really, The End of the Alphabet by C.S. Richardson. Coincidentally, serendipitously, it was a book about death and dying. Ambrose Zephyr, the protagonist of the novella, is told that he has a rare and incurable illness and only one month to live, “give or take a day.”As she was dying, Professor Bearing travelled through examination rooms, and hospital waiting areas, and X-rays and chemotherapy; Ambrose Zephyr decides to go on a literal journey, along with his wife, Zappora Ashkinazi, to an alphabetical list of meaningful places.

A is for Amsterdam.
B is for Berlin.
C is for Chartres, etc.

As the couple visit each place, Ambrose becomes more ill, more distant and withdrawn, and more desperate. Zappora, nicknamed Zipper, tries to travel with her husband on his dying journey, but it’s not something easily shared.

Ambrose: “So what? So there it is. Here I am. There’s nothing to deal with. If there were I would do it. But there isn’t and I am terrified and this isn’t happening to you.”
Zipper: “You selfish, silent, sh—, bastard. This is happening to me.”
Ambrose: “Really? In less than a month, you’ll still be alive.”
Zipper: “Really. I can hardly wait. Lying in on Sundays? At last. A decent cup of tea? Brilliant. No more squinting, no more imagination, no more silence? I can hardly f— wait.”

Zipper Ashkenazi and Ambrose Zephyr believe in each other, in communication and shared experience and in love. Zipper is left in the end with silence and her own words echoing off the pages of her journal, “This story is unlikely.” In fact, death is the most likely story of all. It is appointed unto man once to die, and after that the judgement.

Dr. Vivian Bearing believes in her own strength and stoicism, and when that is stripped away from her by her illness, she is left with the poetry of John Donne. She clings, not to God himself, but to Donne’s faith in God, and finally Donne’s conceits and paradoxes are empty for her, too. Her elderly mentor reads to her, not Donne, but rather the elegantly simple picture book, The Runaway Bunny by Margaret Wise Brown. I wonder if one can commit one’s soul to God mediated through the words of a picture book and a seventeenth century poet?

That question brings me back full circle to Donne, and ultimately to God.

“We have a winding-sheet in our mother’s womb which grows with us from our mother’s conception and we come into the world wound up in that winding-sheet, for we come to seek a grave.”
~John Donne’s sermon, Death’s Duel

Dr. Bearing died trusting, perhaps, in the God of Donne and of the Runaway Bunny. Ambrose Zephyr died at home in bed with his wife nearby, their final separation leading only to an “unlikely story.” How will I die? How will you?

“Our critical day is not the very day of our death, but the whole course of our life . . . God doth not say, Live well, and thou shalt die well, that is, an easy, a quiet death; but live well here, and thou shalt live well forever.”
~ Death’s Duel by John Donne.

I may die laughing or crying or screaming, with a bang or a whimper, but into His hands I commit my spirit. And I believe it to be highly likely that “He is able to keep that which I’ve committed unto Him against that day.”

The Meaning of Marriage

Noah Webster’s 1828 dictionary defined marriage as:

The act of uniting a man and woman for life; wedlock; the legal union of a man and woman for life. Marriage is a contract both civil and religious, by which the parties engage to live together in mutual affection and fidelity, till death shall separate them. Marriage was instituted by God himself for the purpose of preventing the promiscuous intercourse of the sexes, for promoting domestic felicity, and for securing the maintenance and education of children.

Merriam-Webster Online now says marriage is:

1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law
(2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage: same-sex marriage
b: the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c: the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected ; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
3: an intimate or close union: the marriage of painting and poetry — J. T. Shawcross.

I am thinking a lot about the meaning of marriage these days. I find it disingenuous, at the very least, for gay activists to say that they are not, by their lobbying and legislative and judicial actions, trying to redefine marriage.

However, as the definition of marriage has changed in the last two hundred years, it has not been completely as a result of recent homosexual activism and propaganda. WIth no credentials as a sociologist or a historian, I give my humble opinion that the definition of marriage began to change as more and more people in Western society lost faith in the Bible and the God of the BIble, and that it continued to lose meaning as promiscuity and fornication became, not only common, but also acceptable as a lifestyle.

If marriage is not a contract “both civil and religious”, then what is its basis? If God and Adam did not agree on the definition of marriage in Genesis 2:24 (Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.), then why can’t we as a society, by majority vote or evolving social mores, define marriage any way we see fit? Serial marriage in which the partners know that that the marriage contract is impermanent or polygamy in which either partner can have have more than one lifetime mate or homosexual marriage in which both partners are of the same sex or open marriage/non-marriage in which the couple lives together but there’s no legal commitment . . . . the options are endless.

In this kind of society, with undefined marriage that’s simply “a state of being united to a person”, marriage loses all meaning. I can be united to Engineer Husband today and to Tom, Dick or Mary tomorrow. I can move in with Joe and decide that I want us to stay “married” for the rest of our lives, but he can leave me whenever the first gray hair appears.

We’re entering Wonderland, and it looks as if the state is to be master. Our democratically elected government will decide the meaning of the word marriage and in the process will drain the word, and the institution, of all meaning.

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is, ” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty. “which is to be master—that’s all.”

I find this to be a sad state of affairs, and I challenge anyone who advocates for such meaningless marriage to tell me how it can be good for children or for a civil society, much less how it can be right before a holy God who created us to cleave to a mate of the opposite sex and become one flesh. Of course, if marriage means “whatever I choose it to mean, neither more nor less,” I am free to have my partner(s) in marriage choose a different meaning from mine. And that’s not freedom at all; it’s chaos.

Gringolandia by Lyn Miller-Lachman

I must say upfront that the political agenda in this YA novel made me uncomfortable. Maybe that’s a good thing; we all need to have our assumptions challenged at times, especially political assumptions. However, I don’t know enough about the historical and geographical setting of the book, late twentieth century Chile, to know whether the author was portraying events and government actions accurately and fully or not.

That said, the book is set in Chile—Pinochet’s Chile. The CIA is the villainous corporation in the background, and protagonist Daniel’s Communist father, Marcelo, is the good guy. In 1980 when Daniel was only twelve years old the police arrested Marcelo because he was the publisher and primary journalist for an underground newspaper written in opposition to Chile’s military regime.

After his father’s arrest, Daniel, his mother, and his younger sister Tina flee to Wisconsin while his father remains imprisoned in Chile. Although the small family tries to influence the Chilean government to release Marcelo and other prisoners of conscience, they are also making a new life for themselves in Wisconsin and becoming part of “Gringolandia”, a land their father hates because of its support for Pinochet and his thugs.

When Marcelo is released from prison and rejoins his family in the U.S., there are problems that seem to keep multiplying. How can Marcelo recover menatlly and physically from the years of imprisonment and torture? What is he to do with his life now that he is free? Is Daniel Chilean or American, chileno or gringo? What about Daniel’s gringa girlfriend? Will she ever be able to understand what it means to fight against a repressive and dictatorial government? Can Daniel and his father restore the father/son relationship that was interrupted by his father’s arrest? Can Daniel’s mother return to a traditional marriage relationship after six years of independence in the U.S.?

The story edges into a kind of racism or xenophobia that implies that someone from another culture or country can never understand or relate to a native of, for instance, Chile. This premise is never stated, but it is there under the surface. Also, the ideas that Salvador Allende was a hero, the socialist saviour of Chile (questionable) and that Pinochet was a power-hungry and thuggish dictator (probably quite true) are basic to the story, and again, I’m not really prepared to evaluate the evidence for and against those characterizations. I have heard of the “desaparecidos” during Pinochet’s rule, from 1973-1990, and I’m sure that the imprisonment and torture described in the book were tragically common and standard practice in Chile at the time.

Altogether, Gringolandia was a good story, a useful look at one family’s immigrant experience, and an education in the politics, history, and culture of Chile. I didn’t like the ending of the story very much, but I felt it was realistic and probable for the characters as I’d gotten to know them over the course of the book.

Sunday Salon: Gleaned from the Saturday Review

The Sunday Salon.com

Again, I am rather foolishly adding these books to my already lengthy TBR list. I love finding new titles to crave.

Dough: A Memoir by Mort Zachter. Recommended by Lisa at 5 Minutes for Books. I read another review of this book, but Lisa’s is the one that convinced me that I have to find a copy somewhere and read it.

Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Recommended at Lines in Pleasant Places.

The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age by Sven Birkerts. Recommended by Janet at Across the Page.

Bad Mother by Ayelet Waldman. Recommended by Florinda at The 3R’s. I think I want to read this one; I’m determined NOT to buy in to the Perfect Parent Syndrome that I do believe is rampant in our society. However, I hope I don’t find out that I’m just making excuses, and I really am a Bad Mom.

Scoop by Evelyn Waugh is already on deck for the Semicolon Book Club in October. Here’s a review from Word Lily.

Half of a Yellow Sun by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. Recommended by Ti at Book Chatter. I’m quite interested in books set in and written by authors from the 53 (more or less) countries of Africa. I would like to compile a list of recommended books with one or more from each country. Half of a Yellow Sun is set in Biafra, a part of Nigeria that was involved in an attempted breakaway from that country in the late 1960’s. Also recommended at Small World Reads, The Magic Lasso and Pages Turned.

The Spellman FIles (and sequels) by Lisa Lutz. Recommended by S. Krishna.

Best Intentions by Emily Listfield. Recommended by S. Krishna. The trust issues and complex relationships in this book made it seem as if it would be a worthwhile read.

The Forever War by Dexter Filkins. Recommended by Gavin at Page247. About the war on terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane by Kate DiCamillo. Recommended by Emily at Homespun Light. Nope, I’ve never read it, although I’ve read widely differing opinions on it.

Fixing Abraham by Chris Tiegreen. Recommended by Becky at Operation Actually Read Bible.

Forest Born by Shannon Hale. Recommended at Becky’s Book Reviews.

Enough/bastante! I estimate that I may be able to finish all of the books on my reading list by the year 2100, at which time I will be approximately 143 years old.

LOST Rehash: Follow the Leader

I’m a little late with this week’s rehash because I can’t figure out whom to follow. In fact, as far as LOST is concerned, I’m officially lost.

As I asked last week, which leader?

Jack is trying to lead the Losties (1977) in carrying out Faraday’s vision of blowing up the entire island with a hydrogen bomb. I’m with Kate on this idea: since when did detonating bombs and shooting kids become anyone’s “destiny”? Sayid is the only one following Jack, and Eloise seems to have her own agenda.

Oh, yeah, and who’s the leader of the Others (1977)? Whidmore or Eloise? Or RIchard Alpert?

John Locke thinks he’s the leader of the Others (200?), and Richard is just an “advisor.” But it’s Richard who is leading the Band of Others to Jacob, who may be a leader or may be a fraud? John’s such a great leader that he gets to tell Richard to tell John Locke (time-travelling version) what to do so that John basically tells himself to die before returning to the island.

Alpert and Ben (200?) are letting Locke have his head, so to speak, but at the same time they’re muttering to each other about how Locke is starting to be a problem. So Ben thinks he’s still in charge, manipulating things from behind the curtain, as he’s always done.

Sawyer (1977) led Juliet right onto that sub and had plans to make a fortune investing in Microsoft. But he gained an unwanted (by Juliet, at least) follower at the last minute as Kate made the investment partnership into a triangle —again. Kate, get lost; go sober up your first boyfriend, Jack.

In Dharmaville (1977), the leadership question is even murkier, if that’s possible. Horace is supposed to be the Dharma mayor or Grand Poobah, or something. But Crazy Radzinsky, along with his nerdy henchman Phil, has staged a coup and taken over. However, they all let Dr. Chang tell them to send the women and children to safety, and it’s Hurley who’s the behind-the-scenes instigator of that decision.

So, “follow the leader” might be good advice if anyone knew who the leader was.

By the way, Star Wars isn’t the only 70’s/80’s movie to which I’m seeing flashbacks:

The scene where Jack and his crew swam under the pond to get to the caves where the hydrogen bomb was stored reminded me of The Poseidon Adventure (1972). And those Poseidon survivors had leadership issues, too. If only LOST could have Shelley Winters as one of the Losties!

Then, all the torches in underground tombs or whatever they are with hieroglyphics on the walls: shades of Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)! I was waiting for the snakes to come crawling out of the walls.

Of course, the whole time travel thing and can we fix the past to make the future turn out differently? Or are we messing up things in the past in a way that will mess up the future in a catastrophic way? Back to the Future (1985).

I know that scene with the submarine leaving the island reminded me of some movie, too. Anyone?

Nominated for Best Books for Young Adults

Here’s a list, via Mitali Perkins, of the book nominated for the The Young Adult Library Services Association (YALSA) list of Best Books for Young Adults. “The Best Books for Young Adults committee each year selects and annotates a list of significant adult and young adult books, as well as chooses a list of top ten titles from the full list. It is a general list of fiction and nonfiction titles selected for their proven or potential appeal to the personal reading tastes of the young adult.” The lists are presented at the ALA Midwinter meeting in January, so these books are nominated for the 2010 list.

I haven’t read any of the nominated books, but these are the ones I’m interested in reading:

Anderson, Laure Halse. Wintergirls. Penguin/Viking Books. 2009. 978-0-670-01110-0. $17.99
Lia is haunted by her best friend’s death from anorexia, as she struggles with the same eating disorder.

Boorhaem, Ellen. The Unnameables. Houghton Mifflin. 2008. 978-0-15-206368-9. $16.00.
In a place where everything has a name and every name has a meaning, outsider Medford Runyuin struggles in vain to follow the rules of his adopted home.

Burg, Anne E. All the Broken Pieces. Scholastic. 2009. 978-0-545-08092-7. $16.99.
12-year-old Matt struggles to cope with his memories of family left behind in war-torn Vietnam with the help of his adoptive parents, his music teacher, and his baseball coach.

Clayton, Emma. The Roar. Scholastic/Chicken House. 2009. 978-0-439-92593-8. $17.99.
The government is making thousands of children strong, agile and competitive, but why? Twelve-year-old Mika plays along, hoping the training will lead him to his kidnapped twin.

Davies, Jacqueline. Lost. Marshall Cavendish. 2009. 978-0-7614-5535-6. $16.99.
Essie, 16, sews all day for pennies at the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory to help feed her fatherless family and now to forget her little sister’s death. Then the fire happens.

George, Jessica Day. Princess of the Midnight Ball. Bloomsbury. 2009. 978-1-59990-322-4. $16.99.
When the decade long war ends, professional solider Galen finds work as a gardener in the king’s garden, only to help solve the puzzle involving twelve dancing princesses.

Headley, Justina Chen. North of Beautiful. Little, Brown and Company. 978-0-316-02505-8. $16.99.
Terra Cooper is held back in life by her facial port-wine stain, her controlling father and herself. When she meets Jacob’s family, she and her mother begin to escape.

Howell, Simmone. Everything Beautiful. Bloomsbury. 2008. 978-1-59990-042-1. $19.99.
Riley is intent on escaping the Christian camp her father has sent her to before the week is out, but meeting Dylan Luck, who uses a wheelchair, challenges her own beliefs and plans.

Libby, Alisa M. The King’s Rose. Penguin/Dutton. 2009. 978-0-525-47970-3. $17.99.
A pawn to her family’s ambition, Catherine Howard tries to give Henry VIII a son.

Livingston, Leslie. Wondrous Strange. Harper Collins/Harper Teen. 2009. 978-0-06-157539-6. $16.99.
Faeries, pixies, Janus guards, and struggling actresses populate this fantasy that weaves Shakespeare’s A Midsummer’s Night Dream with a contemporary New York City Setting.

Smith, Sherri L. Flygirl. Penguin/G.P. Putnam’s Sons. 2009. 978-0-399-24709-5. $16.99.
During WWII Ida Mae Jones must go against her family and heritage to join the Army’s WASP program and fulfill her dream of being a pilot.

I love picking books off lists and adding them to my list. Have you read any of these? Are you interested in reading any of them?

Short Takes on YA

I read a few books over the past couple of months that I don’t have too much to say about. These books are all four O.K., maybe more than O.K., but none of them provoked me to verbosity.

Flipped by Wendelin Van Draanen was a toned-down version of Stargirl (Semicolon review here). Boy meets girl (second grade). Girl chases boy (second through seventh grade). Boy runs away, doesn’t appreciate girl. Girl falls out of love as boy begins to appreciate what he’s lost. Recommended by Melanie at Deliciously Clean Reads.

Saving Juliet by Suzanne Selfors. I had a professor once who said that every time he read Romeo and Juliet he hoped against hope that it would all end differently, that the star-crossed lovers would somehow sort it all out and live happily ever after. In Saving Juliet, Mimi Wallingford, a young actress with problems of her own, magically gets a chance to save Juliet and turn Shakespeare’s tragedy into a comedy. But Mimi, and her leading man, pop star Troy Summer, may not be able to survive long enough in dangerous sixteenth century Verona to do anyone any good. The dialog is kind of hokey, and there are some holes in the plot. Nevertheless, not bad re-imagining. Recommended by Melissa at Estella’s Revenge.

Winnie’s War by Jenny Moss. The setting is a fictional town right here where I live near Friendswood, Texas. The war is World War I and Winnie’s own personal war with her grandmother and with the 1918 influenza epidemic and with growing up. This one is pitched a little younger than the two above-mentioned books; Winnie is twelve years old as the story begins. However, I would give it to middle-schoolers. Here’s an author interview with Ms. Moss at Cynsations.

Just One Wish by Janette Rallison. Annika is desperate to get the star of her brother Jeremy’s favorite TV show, Teen Robin Hood, to come visit and convince Jeremy that dreams can come true. Jeremy has a big dream, that he’ll get well after his surgery for cancer. And it’s up to Annika to make it come true. Kind of cute, kind of sad, kind of unbelievable, not a bad way to spend an hour or two.

By the way I haven’t ever expressed an opinion on the whole off-with-her-head controversy as it pertains to book covers because I’m not an art critic and the last time I said something negative about the cover art on a book I got in trouble with the author, even though I liked the book itself very much. Let’s just say I much prefer Winnie’s picture to Mimi’s. What’s with the trend toward guillotining protagonists on the cover of their own books anyway?

Diversity in Reading Meme

Name the last book by a female author that you’ve read.
I read lots of books by women, probably as many or more than I do by men. The last female authored book I read was To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis. Semicolon review here. I don’t think women are particularly “marginalized” or left unread because they’re women in today’s world.

Name the last book by an African or African-American author that you’ve read. Ummmm, I would have to look up all the authors of all the books I’ve read lately to see if any of them are African or African-American.
The last one I know for sure was African was Long Way Gone: Memoirs of a Boy Soldier by Ishmael Beah.
Oh, I read Cutting for Stone by Abraham Verghese in March, and his bio says: “Born of Indian parents who were teachers in Ethiopia, he grew up near Addis Ababa and began his medical training there.”

Name one from a Latino/a author.
I haven’t read any Hispanic authors lately.

How about one from an Asian country or Asian-American?
The Secret-Keeper by Mitali Perkins, and before that one, Walking from East to West by Ravi Zacharias.

What about a GLBT writer?
I do not inquire as to the sexual preferences of the authors I read, and if they start writing in detail about sin and perversion, homosexual or heterosexual, I quit reading. I did re-read Oscar Wilde’s delightful play, The Importance of Being Earnest, not too long ago.

Why not name an Israeli/Arab/Turk/Persian writer, if you’re feeling lucky?
Finding Nouf by Zoe Ferraris. Semicolon review here. Ms. Ferraris isn’t exactly of Middle Eastern extraction, but her book is set in Saudi Arabia and paints a sympathetic, but realistic, picture of that culture ane the people who live in it.
I’m reading a much less sympathetic but no less realistic book now by Lebanese author Kamal Saleem, nonfiction memoir about terrorism and redemption/conversion. The title is The Blood of Lambs.

Any other “marginalized” authors you’ve read lately?
I dunno. Who’s marginalized?

Now, I have a couple of questions to add to this “diversity exercise”.

What have you read lately that takes an opposite political view from your own?
I’m not too good about this attempt at cross-cultural understanding because reading an entire book from a liberal, anti-religious point of view is annoying in the extreme. I get enough of that bias anytime I look at Time or Newsweek or any other major news source.

Have you read any Jewish authors lately?
Again, it’s hard to say. Half the authors on my list could be Jewish for all I know.

How about Muslim writers?
The above-mentioned Mr. Saleem is a former Muslim. The last book I remember reading that was truly from a Muslim perspective was Orhan Pamuk’s Snow. Semicolon thoughts here. (I didn’t care for it much.)

If you are Christian or at least monotheistic, have you read any books from an atheistic or agnostic viewpoint lately? Or if you are non-religious, have you read anything written by a Christian or other religous person that specifically form a Christian point of view?
I am a Christian, and I’ve read lots of books that incorporate a non-Christian worldview, but nothing lately that has an anti-Christian theme as its main point.

Do you think a reader should deliberately try to sample other cultures, other worldviews, and other ethical and religious perspectives? Why or why not?

Sunday Salon: Gleaned from the Saturday Review and Other Places

The Sunday Salon.com

These books are the ones I’m adding to my own unmanageable reading list. I can hardly wait to read them all plus the 100+ others on my list. Thanks to everyone for all of the great suggestions.

The Household Guide to Dying by Debra Adelaide. Recommended by Dawn at 5 Minutes for Books. I’d like to read this one and compare it with a couple of other books about death and dying that I’ve read lately: Tender Graces by Jackina Stark and Passage by Connie Willis.

The Cellist of Sarajevo by Steven Galloway. Recommended by Carrie at Books and Movies.

Every Eye by Isobel English. Recommended by Fleurfisher. This “quiet story” from Persephone Books sounds delightful.

The King’s Daughter by Sandra Worth. Recommended by Deanna at Mom Musings.

The English Patient by Michael Odaatje. Recommended by S. Krishna.

The Elegance of the Hedgehog by Muriel Barbery. Recommended at Civil Thoughts. This one sounds, well, elegant.

The Great Emergence by Phyllis TIckle. Recommended by Raima at Complexity Simplified.

Also Laura reviews Tea TIme for the Traditionally Built, Alexander McCall Smith’s latest No.1 Ladies’ Detective Agency saga, and I’m looking forward to it. And I also want to get my hands on a copy of Tuck, the third in the King Raven trilogy by Stephen Lawhead.

The Semicolon Book Club selection for May is a children’s book that I thought should have won the Newbery Award. Instead, it was a Newbery Honor book: The Underneath by Kathi Appelt. Here are my thoughts on the book after I read for the first time last October. I’ll be interested to see what others who read it this month think about it. It provoked pretty strong opinions, both pro and con, among the kidlit bloggers who read it last year. Leave me a comment or email me and I’ll be happy to link to your review of The Underneath anytime in May.

Books Read in April, 2009

To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis. Semicolon review here.

Eat Drink and Be from Mississippi by Nancy Kincaid.

Tender Grace by Jackina Stark. Semicolon review here.

Passage by Connie WIllis.

The Rule of Claw by John Brindley.

Winnie’s War by Jenny Moss.

I Remember the Alamo by D. Ann Love.

Just One Wish by Janette Rallison.

Alexander Hamilton by Ron Çhernow.

Best fiction book read in April: To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie WIllis.

Best and only nonfiction books read in April: Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow. (Hey, it’s a long book, and it took a while. But it was good and went right along with my John Adams reading from March.)

Only 9 books in April, but they were mostly good books and some were quite long. I didn’t read Paradise Lost for the Semicolon Book Club as I had intended. It was actually a very difficult month, family-wise, and it’s a wonder I read as much as I did. However, reading is also my preferred form of therapy. It’s a lot cheaper than a psychiatrist.