Archives

Born May 20th

Margery Allingham (b. 1904) wrote mystery novels featuring detective Albert Campion and his manservant Lugg. She was another one of those “British lady mystery writers of the 1920’s through the 40’s” like Dame Agatha, Dorothy Sayers, and Josephine Tey. I read one of her books a long time ago, The Fashion in Shrouds, but I remember being very puzzled as to what exactly was happening in the novel. I think I’ll try another and see if I remain confused or become a fan. Official website of the Margery Allingham Society.

Sigrid Undset (b. 1882) wrote Kristin Lavransdotter, a trilogy of novels set in the Middle Ages in Norway about a woman’s life, mariage, and death and her relationship to God and to the church. A good friend recommended this set of novels to me long ago, but I have never gotten around to reading them. They’re on my list. Undset “wove religious themes into most of her works” and believed that “motherhood is the highest duty to which a woman can aspire.” She sounds like my kind of gal. Sigrid Undset won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1928. She also joined the resistance when Norway was occupied by the Nazis and was eventually forced to flee to the United States where she lived in exile until the war was over.

Born May 18th

Omar Khayyam, b. 1048. Last year’s post on the Persian poet.

Dame Margot Fonteyn, b. 1919, d. 1991. Celebrated British ballerina, her most famous role was Aurora in The Sleeping Beauty. (For Dancer Daughter–and anyone else who might be interested in The Dance.)

Pope John Paul II, b 1920, d. 2005. Karol Wojtyla was born in Wadowice, Poland. He was the first Polish pope. I like this papal quote: “Do not abandon yourselves to despair. We are the Easter people and hallelujah is our song.” And this one should be posted above my door because we all have much work to do in this regard: “To maintain a joyful family requires much from both the parents and the children. Each member of the family has to become, in a special way, the servant of the others.”

Lillian Hoban, b. 1925. Last year’s post on Lillian Hoban.

Books Are Movies?

I’ve read two recently published novels in the last few days, and as I was reading the second one, I realized something. Books nowadays are written in the form of movies. Either that or I read them that way, and I don’t think that’s it because I don’t see this movie formula in older books. Let me describe what I mean, and you see if you recognize it in the next novel you read.

1. Scene changes: The author writes a page or two or three about one set of characters in one setting; then he leaves some extra space or inserts a line or few dingbats and switches to another character or characters in another locale. The reader knows that all these separate stories and characters are going to come together by the end of the movie, er … novel, but no one except the scriptwriter himself knows exactly how they are related or how they will resolve into a satisfying ending. Older writers don’t switch scenes nearly so quickly. Tolkien has long sections about one set of characters before he moves to another set; Dickens has different sets of characters in different settings, but he follows David Copperfield, for instance, as he goes from one setting to another. David is the thread that ties everyone together.

2. Plot and action: Every short scene has to have some sort of physical action. Even when the characters are just talking or thinking at first, they’re almost always interrupted by some Event or Important Pronouncement. Someone jumps out the window; shots are fired; secrets are revealed; at the very least the love interest falls into the hero’s arms–or slaps him.

3. Romance: No modern movie or book is complete without at least one romance. Moby Dick would never make it these days. Where’s Ishmael’s love interest? No Huck Finn or Red Badge of Courage either. In fact one of the books I read is set during WWII, but the author can’t decide whether he’s writing a war novel or a romance. I guess it’s both at the same time. At least Henry V (Shakespeare) waits until the battle part is all over before he woos his lady love.

I’m not saying these rules don’t work to produce a readable story, but when did these become the rules? Do publishers or editors tell writers to write according to this formula? I’m really curious. Maybe there’s name for this kind of writing or a set of rules written down somewhere in Publishing Land, and I’m way behind because I just noticed the phenomenon. I so, go ahead and tell me. I’m used to being behind the times.

The first book I read, Improbable by Adam Fawer, was an absorbing thriller. It worked. I could have done without some of the more graphic violence, but I guess that’s part of the formula, too, so that your movie book will get at least a PG-13 or an R rating. (Actually, if I had to watch some of the stuff described in this book, I’d give it an X rating.) Lots of violence, plot twists galore, and little or no sex (but the obligatory love interest is there).

The other book is The Keeper’s Son by Homer Hickam, author of Rocket Boys which was made into a very successful movie, October Sky. This one, as I said, is set during WWII off the coast of North Carolina. Maybe Mr. Hickam writes movie-style because he’s already had one of his books made into a movie. However, the romantic interludes were just a distraction in the middle of a German submarine vs. US Coast Guard war novel. The novel focuses on Josh Thurlow, the captain of the Coast Guard boat, and on Krebs, commander of the German submarine that is sinking freighters with impunity just off the coast of Killakeet Island where Josh’s patrol and rescue boat is stationed. The duel between these two men and the details about life on a German submarine are interesting, but we keep on having other subplots and supporting characters stuck in the middle of it all whose presence is unnecessary. There’s a Preacher who’s lost his faith, a German who may be Josh’s long lost brother, a crazed-by-grief Navy commander who shanghais one of Thurlow’s sailors, etc.

I really read this book only because it comes before Hickam’s newest book, The Ambassador’s Son, which also features Josh Thurlow and is set in the South Pacific. I guess Thurlow got a transfer after the first book. I thought that The Ambassadot’s Son sounded interesting because it also has two fictional characters named “Shafty” and “Nick” who turn out to be none other than JFK and Richard Nixon, in their younger war years. I don’t know if I’ll read this sequel or not, though; as I read the blurbs it seems to me that again there’s altogether too much romance worked into the mix. Maybe I’ll just wait for the movie.

Shakespearean Questions, or Nobody Asked My Opinion, but Here It Is Anyway

Someone with the initials K.B. challenged Mental Multivitamin to answer these Shakespeare questions. I thought it would be fun to borrow the meme/quiz and answer them myself. You can play, too, if you’d like.

1. Name the first five lines of Shakespeare that come into your head. (No fair looking them up or thinking too hard.)
To be or not to be; that is the question. —Hamlet

Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time. —Macbeth

Men have died from time to time, and worms have eaten them,
But not for love.

All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players. —As You Like It

Out, out damned spot! –Macbeth

2. The last Shakespeare play you went to see on stage.

At Shakespeare at Winedale last summer we saw The Merry Wives of WIndsor and The Tempest

3. The last Shakespeare film homage or adaptation you watched at home or at the movies.

It seems to me that we watched Kenneth Branagh’s Much Ado about Nothing a couple of months ago.
.
4. What Shakespeare homage/adaptation/plays are on your to be read/seen list?

We’ll go to Winedale again this summer (God willing), and we’ll see Hamlet, The Taming of the Shrew, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream. A group of home-schooled drama students are presenting A Comedy of Errors (set in the 1920’s?) in a couple of weeks, and I’m looking forward to that bit of fluff and fun.

5. Name a favorite Shakespeare-inspired work.

West Side Story

6. Why do you think Shakespeare’s plays are still popular?

MMV quotes Harold Bloom. I’ll just say that Shakespeare’s plays are still popular because Shakespeare knew about people and knew how to write plays about people and knew how to use words that people would remember and quote and use to define their own thoughts and feelings and situations.

Thanks to Someone

The Flame Tree by Richard Lewis tells the story of Isaac Williams, the twelve year old son of American missionary doctors in Java, Indonesia. His best friend is Ismail (get it–Isaac and Ishmael?), a Muslim boy who is beginning to be caught up in Nahdlatul Umat Islam, a fundamentalist Islamic group with terrorist ties. Isaac is at first confused when Ismail says that they can no longer be friends unless Isaac submits to Islam. Then things get even worse when a faction of the Nahdlatul Umat Islam captures Isaac and holds him as a hostage. Finally, after facing malaria, cruelty, fear, and degrading treatment, Isaac is released, but then he must decide what to do about his captors and about his bitterness toward God for allowing him to suffer at the hands of evil men. The entire book is an interesting lesson about what can happen when Islam and Christianity clash, and the characters in the book demonstrate that people are complicated and difficult to understand. The Islamic hostage-takers are not one dimensional, stereotypical evil terrorists, but rather men, and women, who are sometimes kind, sometimes very cruel, caught up in a religion that allows fanaticism to grow and at the same time preaches peace. Isaac himself is not sure who he is after his captivity. “Maybe, just like he was neither a Javanese nor an American, he was no longer a Christian, but not quite a Muslim.” Later, he comes to see that, unlike Muslims who have no choice but to submit to the will of Allah, he has choice, and he chooses, by the grace of God, to be a Christian and to forgive. This is a difficult book in the sense that the author describes Isaac’s treatment during his captivity in more graphic terms than I was comfortable reading, but I realized after reading about the cruelty of some of the terrorists that perhaps I needed to be made uncomfortable in order to appreciate the miracle of forgiveness that comes in the ending.

At first I didn’t think that the second book I read this week had much in common with The Flame Tree. The Sea of Trolls by Nancy Farmer is historical fiction/fantasy set during the 8th century AD on the coast of England and in Scandanavia. It includes Viking raids, trolls, dragons, talking animals, and magic spells. However, there are at least a couple of points of similarity. Jack is eleven when the Northmen, berserkers, raid his village. He, too, learns that people are not all bad nor always to be trusted. Jack, like Isaac, is a captive, and any time he begins to trust and even admire his captors, he is reminded of their cruelty and otherness. Jack is Saxon, and his village is Christian. The Northmen are worshippers of Odin and believe in seeking a glorious death in battle which will send them straight to Valhalla, a “heaven” that sounds a lot like an everlasting drunken feast. Jack remains a Christian, mostly because he doesn’t seem to think he has any choice, but he does learn to care about the Northmen even though they are not to be trusted to act in accordance with Christian morality, but only to act as their own pagan religion tells them to in order to maintain their honor. Jack, like Isaac WIlliams, returns home at the end of the book. Unlike Isaac, Jack doesn’t deal with the choice between bitterness and forgiveness; he just feels happy to be home, although he does wonder if he should have given kindness to one of his enemies when he was a slave to the Northmen. His teacher reassures him that “no kindness is ever wasted, not can we ever tell how much good may come of it.”

It seems to me that both of these books teach the same lesson: peace and forgiveness and understanding, as important as they are, can only go so far. At the end of the day, if those who follow a different god are determined to be obedient to their own evil desires and to revel in cruelty, we must defend ourselves and our families and villages even as we forgive and try to understand their blindness (there but for the grace of God go I). Hell is real because some people choose it. Not even God forces forgiveness on those who do not believe they need it, those who believe they have done nothing wrong, those who practice cruelty and sin in the name of Odin or Allah . . . or Jesus.

I have a problem. I’m getting lots of good recommendations for books to read from bloggers, too many ideas for the time in which I have to read them. However, that’s not the problem. I just finished these two books that I saw recommended somewhere maybe a month or two ago. I have no idea who recommended The Sea of Trolls nor The Flame Tree. Thank you, though, and be sure to comment if you gave me the tip on either of these.

My Day in Books

I feel as if I’ve been reading aloud all day, in between other tasks. Today I’ve read the following books to various and sundry urchins:

Danny and the Dinosaur by Syd Hoff
Green Eggs and Ham by Dr. Seuss
The Cat in the Hat by Dr. Seuss
To Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street by Dr. Seuss
Thomas the Tank Engine’s Hidden Surprises
Blue’s Clues (board book)
The Magic Schoolbus Inside a Beehive by Joanna Cole
Dance at Grandpa’s by Laura Ingalls Wilder
One chapter (Sugar Snow) from Little House in the Big Woods by Laura Ingalls Wilder
One chapter from Justin Morgan Had a Horse by Marguerite Henry

I also tried to read my book, The Sea of Trolls by Nancy Farmer, but I didn’t make much progress–too many interruptions. The forecast for tomorrow: prayer and more reading.

The Poet’s Advantage

The poet may say or sing, not as things were, but as they ought to have been; but the historian must pen them, not as they ought to have been, but as they really were. — Cervantes

Since when did Cervantes stick to penning things “as they really were”? Or did he consider Don Quixote to be one very long poem?
Engineer Husband and I must get back to reading Don Quixote or else we’ll never get through it by the time we leave this reality to enter into things as they ought to have been. I hope you’ve enjoyed this month of poetry at Semicolon, and tomorrow we return to our regularly scheduled programming, with a poem or two thrown in at irregular intervals. Last call: what is your favorite poem or favorite poet? If you haven’t answered this question already, now is the time.

Eragon by Christopher Paolini

First of all, I like fantasy. I’m a Tolkien fanatic, and I’ve read and enjoyed Anne McCaffrey, Lloyd Alexander, C.S. Lewis, Ursula LeGuin, Stephen Lawhead, Carol Kendall, and John Christopher, to name a few favorites. However, I don’t like fantasy that gets too New Age-y or heretical. It doesn’t have to have Christian themes, but I prefer that it not be blatantly anti-Christian. (I will admit that I’ve never read Harry Potter nor have I read the Dark Materials books by Pullman because I was afraid both series would be just “off” enough to annoy me. Please don’t beat me up (figuratively) for not reading these. I know I may be wrong about either or both series.) So when I heard about Eragon,, a very popular fantasy novel mostly about dragons, I adopted a wait-and-see attitude. Dragons can be used to glorify evil in the wrong author’s hands.

Well, I was pleasantly surprised by Eragon. I wouldn’t say that the novel was profound or made me think deep thoughts, but it was a really good story, as advertised. I can see Tolkien influences in it as well as some resemblance to Anne McCaffrey’s Dragonriders of Pern series, but Eragon is not a cheap copy of anyone else’s fantasy as far as I can tell. Christopher Paolini, a homeschooled teenager when he wrote the book, knows how to tell an absorbing story that kept me reading until after midnight last night just to see what would happen to Eragon and his dragon friend Saphira.

Maybe you already know the story of the writing and publication of Eragon: Christopher Paolini finished homeschool high school at age fifteen. He could have gone to college, but he decided to wait a while and write a book instead. He read books about writing, wrote his own book, and then showed it to his parents who owned a small publishing company. Christopher’s parents published the novel, and Christopher himself went on an author tour in the Northwest where his family lives to promote the book. Someone with connections in the publishing world read the book and liked it, and Knopf (Random House) re-published the book. It became a best-seller in 2003-4.

Eragon is the first book in a projected trilogy called the Inheritance trilogy. I will be getting the other two books in the series when they’re published in order to find out what happens next in the land of Alagaesia. I will also suggest that Computer Guru Son read this book. He’s been reading Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy in anticipation of the release of the much-hyped movie version. He really should like Eragon. (By the way, Eragon is also supposed to be made into a movie to be released this year some time.)

Gilead by Marilynne Robinson

Reverend John Ames is seventy-six years old, and he’s been told that “his heart is failing.” So he begins to write down his memories for his seven year old son, the product of a late and very happy marriage to a much younger woman. Reverend Ames starts out writing about his father and his grandfather and about his love for this life, his memories and his regrets. However, before long, he finds that he must deal with the unfinished business of forgiveness and letting go of the past. The book has several themes:

Fathers and Sons
‘My father was a man who acted from principle, as he said himself. He acted from faithfulness to the truth as he saw it. But something in the way he went about it made him disappointing from time to time, and not just to me. I say this despite all the attention he gave to me bringing me up, for which I am profoundly in his debt, though he himself might dispute that. God rest his soul, I know for a fact I disappointed him. It is a remarkable thing to consider. We meant well by each other, too.”

Heaven, Hell and Eternity
“If you want to inform yourselves as to the nature of hell, don’t hold your hand in a candle flame, just ponder the meanest, most desolate place in your soul.”

“I can’t believe that, when we have all been changed and put on incorruptibility, we will forget our fantastic condition of mortality and impermanence,the great bright dream of procreating and perishing that meant the whole world to us. In eternity this world will be Troy, I believe, and all that has passed here will be the epic of the universe, the ballad they sing in the streets.”

On Predestination and the Possibility that People Can Change
” . . . there are certain attributes our faith assigns to God: omniscience, omnipotence, justice and grace. We human beings have such a slight acquaintance with power and knowledge, so little conception of justice, and so slight a capacity for grace, that the workings of these great attributes together is a mystery we cannot hope to penetrate.”

“Your mother said, ‘A person can change. Everything can change.’ ”

Faith and Doubt
“I’m not saying never doubt or question. The Lord gave you a mind so that you would make honest use of it. I’m saying you must be sure that the doubts and questions are your own, not, so to speak, the mustache and walking stick that happen to be the fashion of any particular moment.”

I liked the quotes. Rev. Ames has a voice that reminds me of my father-in-law, a Southern Baptist country preacher who lived in our home before he died several years ago. (Interesting aside: I never figured out what denomination Rev. Ames belonged to, just that he was not Baptist, not Presbyterian, not Lutheran, not Quaker, and not Methodist. He believed in baptizing babies, though.)

However, the story itself was what kept me turning the pages of this memoir/novel. I wanted to know the “back story.” How did Rev. Ames come to marry a woman more than thirty years younger than he was? What happened to his grandfather, an abolitionist who knew John Brown and who lost one eye in the Civil War? Why did his brother Edward go to Europe to study and come back an atheist? Can the characters in the book forgive those who disappoint them, especially can Rev. Ames forgive and extend grace to an old friend who may or may not be a repentant sinner? And how did John Ames retain his faith in God and in life itself?

Gilead has lots and lots of questions and even a few answers. I’m planning to read Ms. Robinson’s first novel, Housekeeping, published back in 1981, as soon as I can find it, and I’ll read anything else she writes. This book was one of the best I’ve read in a very long time.

Who’s Intolerant?

I usually don’t discuss the evolution/creation debate because I’m not a scientist and I honestly don’t know exactly how God created the earth and everything in it. However, I read this in a transcript of an interview on msnbc with Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson and found it to be irresistably hubristic:

“Today, I’m happy to report that they don’t burn people at the stake if they claim that Earth goes around the sun, or that there are other stars that might have other planets that themselves could have life.
***********
What were the consequences in the mid-1800s of saying you didn’t believe Darwin? There weren’t any, really. But today, with biotech companies, there is no understanding of biology without the theory of evolution. And so if you say, ‘I don’t believe the theory of evolution, I think we were all specially created,’ you must understand the consequences of it to your own employability.

Now if you don’t want to become a scientist, then maybe it doesn’t matter. Fine. There are plenty of professions that do not involve scientists. But as I said, the emergent economies are going to be scientifically and technologically driven, with biotech front and center. If you’re coming in saying that there was Adam and Eve, you’re not going to get past the front door. Because they can’t use your knowledge base to invent the next vaccine, the next medicine, the next cure for cancer. That knowledge base does not track into discoveries we know are awaiting us in the halls of biotech firms”

So, pardon me for speaking at all since I am not a Darwinian biologist, but what is this man saying?

1. Religions, especially Christianity, must adapt themselves to scientific thought because science is the highest truth.
2. If you don’t accept Darwinian evolution, you’re out of a job and you are not allowed to participate in scientific discussion or discovery. In order to discover a cure for cancer, you must be a Darwinian. No active persecution here; nobody gets arrested. However, you must understand that in order to participate in the “emergent economies,” you will be required to check your brains at the door and toe the party line.
3. Galileo wasn’t allowed to publically discuss the idea that the earth moved around the sun, and today’s biologists aren’t allowed to discuss seriously the possibility of intelligent design.

So who’s under house arrest now? OK, so I exaggerate, slightly. You just aren’t allowed to invent anything or get past the front door of a biotech company. I am happy to report that they don’t burn people at the stake for believing that there was an Adam and an Eve.