Archives

Book-Spotting #9

Dancer Daughter has a kindred spirit; another homeschooled girl is reading nine books at once. Here’s the list of DD’s nine in-process books; Autumn Rain doesn’t list her nine, but she has interesting thoughts on the reading life.

JavaMom posts her list of books-in-progress and books-just-read, and she asks, “What are you reading?” Share your reading-in-progress either here or there.

Cindy on How I Apply the Gospel to my Life Through Reading “Which is a better example to children, a little girl who is so good she won’t break the Sabbath even when her father insists upon it or a mouse who struggles with himself and his desire for greatness and finally finds peace by dying to himself and seeking the face of his king against fearful odds? Isn’t there always something distasteful about a goody-two-shoes? The Gospel is not for the pharisee but the sinner. I relate so much more to the depth of struggle my good friend Reepicheep faced than to Elsie’s simpering goodness.”

Amen. Preach it, sister.

Where To Put All the Books

Stefanie at So Many Books shared a link to this article in The Washington Post about people who have too many books to fit their living space. This problem is so ME!

One lady theorizes, “You think if you keep buying books you will never die until you’ve read them all . . . Of course, that’s absurd.”

Well, no, that’s not my idea. It’s just that there are so many good books that I want to read them all, and I want to own the really good ones so that I can share them with my children and my grandchildren.

Take a look at Carmon’s library tour for a glimpse of what I’d really like to have. (No, it’s not covetousness if you want the other person to keep theirs, but just want one like it, right?)

Go here for a look at my “library”—a term I use loosely. What I really have is a lot of books spread out in shelves and in stacks all over the house. Engineer Husband wants to build me some more shelves, but first he has to find the time. At least, he shares my addiction.

Reviewer’s Dilemma

I have a dilemma. A publisher sent me a book to review. I didn’t ask for the book. It’s a romance novel, and I don’t read romance novels, at least not ones written later than the nineteenth century (Three cheers for Jane Eyre!). It’s not just a romance novel; it’s a Christian romance novel. And generally, Christian romance novels are, in my experience, not good, certainly not better than secular romance novels, which are— not good.

So I read the book. And I didn’t like it. It was predictable with stereotypical characters and a plot that didn’t hang together very well. It was preachy and sort of saccharine-sweet.

It was the author’s first published novel. I don’t flatter myself that I am some great influential reviewer. But I’ve heard that authors, especially authors with only one published book, look for reviews of their book on the internet. I would imagine that the author of the novel that I’m talking about is a nice person, probably a Christian. Some people might enjoy the book, like people who read Harlequin romances for recreation. (OOooh, I already sound snarky. What would I say if I tried to write a real review of this book?) So I would hate to write a real review and hurt someone just for the sake of ?

I don’t mind saying negative things about books whose authors are already dead and gone. I’m not going to hurt their sales or their feelings. And I wouldn’t mind doing a negative review of a book like, say, The Da Vinci Code because Dan Brown already has his millions, and he wouldn’t care what I said anyway. (BTW: I saw a whole table full of cut-rate paperback copies of Mr. Brown’s opus at the grocery store this evening. I thought everyone who reads, other than me, had already read The Da Vinci Code. Are they going for non-reading public now?)

Do I owe the publishers a review because they sent me a free book? Should I warn people that this particular book might not be exactly what they’re looking for in terms of intellectual stimulation or entertainment? Or do I just keep my mouth shut and sell the book to the used book store? Am I taking this all much too seriously? (Answer to last question: probably)

It’s OK. I think I’ve already decided.

Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys


Jean Rhys was born in Dominica (West Indies) to a Welsh father and a white West Indian mother. She spent her childhood in Dominica, then was taken to England, and only revisited Dominica once during her adult years. Wide Sargasso Sea is the only one of her novels set in the West Indies. It is the story of Bertha Mason, the madwoman who is Mr. Rochester’s wife in Charlotte Bronte’s novel, Jane Eyre. At least, the novel started out to be Bertha’s story. Jean Rhys wrote in a letter,

“I came to England between sixteen and seventeen, a very impressionable age and Jane Eyre was one of the books I read then.
Of course, Charlotte Bronte makes her own world, of course she convinces you, and that makes the poor Creole lunatic all the more dreadful. I remember being quite shocked, and when I re-read it rather annoyed. ‘That’s only one side—the English side’ sort of thing.”

So Wide Sargasso Sea is Jean Rhys’ attempt to tell the other side of the story, Bertha’s story. The author runs into a couple of problems. She writes the story of a young Creole (white) girl whose father died and whose mother went insane. Antoinette, as the author comes to call Bertha, has been brought up in an atmosphere of magic and evil and madness, with a black servant who is an obeah woman, a sort of witch or maybe more like the Mexican curandera. I think the novel has at least two goals: to make the reader feel more sympathy for Charlotte Bronte’s Creole madwoman in the attic and to illustrate the deep differences between England and British culture and the life and culture of the English-speaking peoples of the Caribbean.

I already felt sorry for the madwoman, Bertha Mason, when I read Jane Eyre. However, Wide Sargasso Sea made me less sympathetic to her plight, not more so. In Wide Sargasso Sea, Jean Rhys turns Bertha/Antoinette into a superstitious girl who has no ability to adapt or take charge of her life or to make good decisions. Her husband suspects her of sin, infidelity, and madness, and she gives in to him by becoming what he suspects her to be. I can’t sympathize with or respect such a character, although I can pity her. So Rhys’ first problem in this novel is that if her goal is to make us identify with Bertha Mason, that goal is unfulfilled.

The next problem is that the novel seems unfinished. It has an ending; it ends as Bertha is about to burn down down Mr. Rochester’s house as she does in Jane Eyre. This return to the plot of Jane Eyre is marred by the second section of Wide Sargasso Sea in which Jean Rhys has almost decided that the novel is not about Charlotte Bronte’s characters at all, but rather about some other Englishman who marries a Creole girl who then becomes insane. In addition, part of the second section is told from the point of view of this unnamed English husband. The book reads as if it could have used a re-write or a much better editor, and the only way to understand some of the shifts in point of view and intricacies of plot is to make liberal use of the footnotes provided in my edition of the novel. I think I would have been lost without the footnotes.

In short, Wide Sargasso Sea has an interesting premise, but Jean Rhys succeeded in convincing me that nineteenth century Dominican culture, if it was in any way similar to the culture portrayed in the book, was indeed very foreign and dark and mystifying. Almost mad.

What Is a Blog Carnival?

I’m hosting the Third Carnival of Children’s Literature here at Semicolon next week, but some of my readers seem to be a little bit confused about what a blog carnival is. So, I’ll endeavor to explain. A blog carnival is a round-up of links to blog posts from all over the internet on a specific topic. The subject for this carnival is children’s literature, specifically poetry. If you have written anything on your blog about children’s literature in general or about poetry for children in specific, you email me the URL of your blog,the name of your blog, the URL of your post, and a brief description of your post. (Example: In this post, I wrote about the poetry of Edgar Allan Poe and about sharing it with children.)

I’ll put links to all the posts I receive together into one mega-post, and you can hop on over to Semicolon on April 3rd, point and click and read your way through a multitude of posts all about children and literature.

Is that as clear as mud? If you’re still confused, go right now to these past carnivals and see for yourself how it works.

First Carnival of Children’s Literature at Here in the Bonnie Glen by Melissa Wiley, our initiator and fearless leader. Email Melissa if you’re interested in hosting the carnival in future months.

Second Carnival of Children’s Literature at Chicken Spaghetti by Susan.

For this Third Carnival of Children’s Literature, email all submissions to me at sherryDOTearlyATgmailDOTcom by 6 PM, Saturday, April 1st. Again, you should include the URL of your post, the title of the post, the URL of your blog, and a short description or teaser telling about the post you’ve submitted. Please include the words “third carnival of children’s literature” in the subject line of your email.

The Third Carnival of Children’s Literature

. . . is almost here. I’m hosting the third carnival here at Semicolon. Please send your entries in this week. I’ll be terribly embarrassed if no one submits a post, and the carnival is a bust. You may submit any post related to children’s literature; however, since April is National Poetry Month, the theme for the carnival is children’s poetry, developing an appreciation for poetry, enjoying poetry with children—you get the idea. Think Poetically.

Since I’m a rather prosaic sort of person, here are the prosaic details:

Email all submissions to me at sherryDOTearlyATgmailDOTcom by 6 PM, Saturday, April 1st. You should include the URL of your post, the title of the post, the URL of your blog, and a short description or teaser telling about the post you’ve submitted. Please include the words “third carnival of children’s literature” in the subject line of your email. Everyone is invited, so get those posts in now and beat the deadline.

I should have the carnival posted by Monday morning, April 3rd.

Past Carnivals of Children’s Literature:

First Carnival of Children’s Literature at Here in the Bonnie Glen by Melissa Wiley, our initiator and fearless leader. Email Melissa if you’re interested in hosting the carnival in future months.

Second Carnival of Children’s Literature at Chicken Spaghetti by Susan.

The Sunne in Splendour by Sharon Kay Penman

Too much description of intimate details in and out of the marriage bed that I would rather not have known. Too much adultery described too salaciously. Quite a bit of violence, again with gory details. Melodrama. Justification of actions that cannot be justified. Way too long (882 pages).

However, I can forgive the author and recommend this novel, with those reservations, because this book about the lives of Edward IV and Richard III of England got the important stuff right. I could tell from the beginning of the book, page 1, that Richard would be the hero of the story, that he would be good, although imperfect. I knew that Ms. Penman’s Richard would never steal his brother’s crown because he was greedy for power. Nor would he ever murder his two boy nephews, his brother’s sons, after keeping them imprisoned in the Tower. Although Ms. Penman indicts a different villain in the murders than did Josephine Tey in her book Daughter of Time, the book that first convinced me that Richard III was innocent of the murders that history has accused him of perpetrating, Penman agrees with Tey on the main point: Richard wasn’t the villain. He was loyal, brave, and tragic. He was a good guy in spite of his blind spots.

The novel also gives a vivid picture of fifteenth century England, the political intrigue and the battles of the War of the Roses, and the lives of the Yorkist kings, Edward IV and his brother, Richard III. If some of the details would have been better omitted, other details about how people lived and how they thought and who was related to whom were fascinating. I read that Richard’s and Edward’s brother, Edmund, was killed while still a teenager in the same battle in which their father, Richard of York, died. I was reminded that Richard loved and married his cousin, Anne Neville, daughter of Warwick the Kingmaker and widow of the Lancastrian candidate for the throne Edward of Lancaster. Did you know that Richard III was accused, after Anne’s death, of desiring to marry his niece, Elizabeth Woodville, the daughter of his deceased bother, Edward IV, and that Elizabeth Woodville went on to marry Henry Tudor, the pretender who took the throne from Richard? All the switching sides, cross and double-cross, that went on during the War of the Roses and during the reigns of Edward IV and Richard III, is amazing to read about. I thought politics was a blood sport nowadays, but it’s nothing compared to fifteenth century intrigue and diplomacy and treachery.

And The Sunne in Splendor was a good book in spite of its faults.

Oh, yes, and Shakespeare was a better writer, but a poor historian, dependent on flawed sources.

And Richard was most likely not humpbacked either.

Favorite Children’s Books for the Whole Family


Sparrow tells a great story about a child’s book lust leading to theft and injury, and then she asks for a list of our favorite children’s books. I’m going to give you an abbreviated list here because I like lists and because I need to start a list of the 100 best children’s books ever. But I don’t really have time. So here are ten in no particular order.

1. Eight Cousins by Louisa May Alcott. As I said in my List of 100 Best Authors of Fiction, I like Eight Cousins even better than Little Women. It’s the story of an orphan girl, Rose, who comes to live with her bachelor uncle/guardian. She’s about 12 or 13 years old, and she has eight boy cousins who all live in the same neighborhood with her uncle, on a hill called by the family “Aunt Hill” for obvious reasons. The story tells how Rose grows up, how she gets to know her cousins, and how she guides theml and helps them to grow up, too.

2. Charlotte’s Web by E.B. White. So much has been said about this book. It’s just a perfectly balanced book about life and death and friendship and joy and sorrow and . . .

3. The Hobbit by JRR Tolkien. Bilbo Baggins goes on an adventure. Before the movies, before LOTR, came The Hobbit. More fun, less serious, still classic.

4. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe by CS Lewis. I won’t let the popularity of Lewis spoil his books for me. I loved them when I was a kid of a girl, and I still do.

5. Ballet Shoes by Noel Streatfield. Pauline, Petrova, and Pansy are the Fossil sisters. They work together to help provide for their upkeep and attend ballet school and decide how to grow into their own gifts and talents.

6. A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle. I know all the objections just as I know all the objections to Harry Potter. The difference is that I enjoy Madeleine L’Engle’s books immensely, while I can’t bring myself to read HP. I instinctively react negatively to bandwagons.

7. Anne of Green Gables by L.M. Montgomery. Anne is such a winsome character—strong, independent, yet feminine to the bone. I loved Anne’s adventures.

8. Heidi by Johanna Spyri. Did you know that there are sequels to Heidi, Heidi Grows Up and Heidi’s Children? The last two are out of print, but available from used booksellers. I haven’t read the sequels in a long time, but I remember loving all three books.

9. Winnie the Pooh by A.A. Milne. Not Disney’s version, although it’s OK with me that Mr. Disney knew a good book when he saw one, but rather the stories about Pooh illustrated by Ernest Shepard are the real thing. Winnie the Pooh surely speaks to everyone–preschoolers, children, teenagers, young adults, and even us silly old bears.

10. The Saturdays by Elizabeth Enright The premise of this book, about four siblings who pool their money each week so that one of them can take his turn to go on a Saturday adventure, was intriguing to me as a girl. It would still be fun to go on a Saturday adventure all by myself.

I won’t say these are my ten favorites, but they are ten of my favorites. What a nice start for that list of 100.

Book-Spotting #8

Tootle’s Time surveys books on courtship and dating and recommends one of my favorites, Best Friends for Life by Michael and Judy Phillips.

Blest With Sons muses about being down in the valley with Bilbo Baggins.

Did you know that Harry Emerson Fosdick wrote some of the Landmark history books? Of course, this liberal preacher wrote the Landmark books on Jesus, Paul, and Martin Luther. Caveat emptor.

Ariel at Bittersweet Life really liked Annie Dillard’s Pilgrim at Tinker Creek. As I recall, so did Eldest Daughter. I tried to read something by Annie Dillard last summer, but I couldn’t get into it. Too much nature, as I’m remembering it. I probably should try again since I hear so many good things about her writing. I do sometimes misplace parts of my brain. Sometimes I even find them again

To This Great Stage of Fools: Born March 24th

Thomas Spencer Baynes, b. 1823. Philosopher, professor of English literature, Shakesperean scholar, editor of the 9th through the 11th editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Fanny Crosby, b. 1820.

Wiliam Morris, b. 1834. On Morris’s The Defence of Guenevere.

Olive Schreiner, b. 1855 in South Africa to missionary parents. She wrote the novel, Story of an African Farm, a story of life in South Africa. Has anyone read it?

Malcolm Muggeridge, b. 1903. “One of the peculiar sins of the twentieth century which we’ve developed to a very high level is the sin of credulity. It has been said that when human beings stop believing in God they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse: they believe in anything.”

Ian Hamilton, b. 1938. Poet, critic, editor, and biographer.