Archives

Come on Ring Those Bells

Last year during the month of December I set up a Salvation Army Red Kettle in my sidebar through which readers could make secure online donations to the Salvation Army. This year I’m doing the same –two days early.

If you’ve enjoyed reading the posts here at Semicolon this year, please consider a small donation (or a large one) to the Salvation Army. You can donate online by clicking on the red kettle in the sidebar.

Also, all profits from sales of my book, Picture Book Preschool, during the month of December will go to the Salvation Army. So if you’re interested in purchasing a copy for yourself or for a gift, now would be a good time to buy.

Click here for more information on the preschool curriculum book, Picture Book Preschool .

Among the Books of Margaret Peterson Haddix

A couple of months ago I wrote about my discovery of YA author Margaret Peterson Haddix. But at that time I hadn’t yet discovered her most popular series of books, a series that begins with Among the Hidden and continues through seven volumes. I read six of the books in the series this week, and I don’t see that the sixth book brings the story to a satisfying conclusion. However, Ms. Haddix may intend to leave the ending open, or it may all come together in the seventh book, the one I haven’t managed to find in the library yet.

The seven books in this series are:
Among the Hidden (1998)
Among the Imposters (2001)
Among the Betrayed (2002)
Among the Barons (2003)
Among the Brave (2004)
Among The Enemy (2005)
Among the Free (2006)

They’re really just one continuous story, packaged in books that are a couple of hundred pages long for ease of consumption. In my library, half of the books in the series are shelved in the children’s fiction section and the other half are shelved in the YA section. I’d say that’s an issue for libraries, but not for readers. The books are easy to read for about fourth grade and up, and the subject matter is appropriate for anyone who understands the existence of evil and won’t be traumatized by people, even main characters, dying. There is violence, but it’s not terribly graphic for the most part. The children in the book are in real danger, and that danger is not minimized or called off at the last minute.

The premise of the stories is that these children live in a world in which it is illegal for anyone to have more than two children. There has been a problem with food supply in the past, and the totalitarian government decrees that the solution is for everyone to have only two children, no more. Third children are to be aborted or, if they are found out later, killed. In such a world, all the “thirds” are hidden children. Some live in hidden rooms, and others buy fake identities, but they’re all in danger of being found and exterminated at any time.

The books follow a similar pattern: the child protagonist, a third, is forced to come of age and tap inner resources in order to survive in a hostile world. I like the way the children struggle with their own fears and the handicap of having lived a “shadow” life. I like the way some of the characters, who have a heritage of having been taught to trust in God for strength and guidance, continue to do so in a very natural and non-preachy way. sibling relationships and friendships are featured and described in a realistic way.

These books would be excellent for junior high/high school age young adults and science fiction fans. Adventure, an interesting premise, moral dilemmas, intriguing characters —The Shadow Children series has it all. I enjoyed them, and I’m still looking for the last book in the series.

To this Great Stage of Fools: Born November 29th

Three authors were born on this date. All three are listed on my Unfinished List of the 100 Best Fiction Books of All Time. All three wrote for children as well as adults. Can you identify the author for each of the following quotations?

1. “You have to write the book that wants to be written. And if the book will be too difficult for grown-ups, then you write it for children.”

2. “Christmas won’t be Christmas without any presents.”

3. “The very idea of freedom presupposes some objective moral law which overarches rulers and ruled alike…Unless we return to the crude and nursery-like belief in objective values, we perish.”

4. “. . . it comes to me that if I am not free to accept guilt when I do wrong, then I am not free at all. If all my mistakes are excused, if there’s an alibi, a rationalization for every blunder, then I am not free at all. I have become subhuman.”

5. “When we were children, we used to think that when we were grown-up we would no longer be vulnerable. But to grow up is to accept vulnerability… To be alive is to be vulnerable.”

6. “God has paid us the intolerable compliment of loving us, in the deepest, most tragic, most inexorable sense.”

7. “If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.”

8. “Life is my college. May I graduate well, and earn some honors!”

9. “A young man who wishes to remain a sound Atheist cannot be too careful of his reading. There are traps everywhere–‘Bibles laid open, millions of surprises,’ as Herbert says, ‘fine nets and stratagems.’ God is, if I may say it, very unscrupulous.”

10. “Poor dull Concord. Nothing colorful has come through here since the Redcoats.”

Happy Birthday to Jack, Jo, and Maddy, three of my favorite authors and thinkers.

My Mama Always Said

. . . if you don’t toot your own horn, nobody else will.

IMHO, my curriculum book, PictureBook Preschool would be a wonderful Christmas gift for any friend or relative with a preschool child. The weekly book lists are grouped by theme, and January would be a perfect time to start reading aloud daily to your preschooler if you’re not doing so already.

Click here for more information . .

The Thirteenth Tale by Diane Setterfield

Twins. Ghosts. Insanity. Murder. Large English country houses. Odd dreams. Libraries full of books. Numerous references to Jane Eyre

This book has all the ingredients and they’re stirred together well. I recommended it to Eldest Daughter as soon as I finshed it on Thanksgiving, and she stayed up until after 1:00 AM reading it. ‘Nuff said.

However, I’m going to write some more because I can’t resist. I read a book a long time ago about a pair of British twins who were mentally disturbed; I think it was a nonfiction case study, but it may have been fiction. I still remember how very odd the twins were and how one twin controlled the other using nonverbal cues and a secret twin language. The book also told about how the twins were separated and sent to different institutions in hope of improving their mental conditions. I’m really wondering if Ms. Setterfield read that same book or another similar one. I wish I could remember the title.

All that to say, this book is about mentally disturbed twins. It’s also about Story, the stories we live out and the narratives we create to make sense of our lives. The book is about lies and truth, too, and the boundaries that separate the two.

“I will tell you my story, beginning at the beginning, continuing with the middle, and with the end at the end. Everything in its proper place. No cheating. No looking ahead. No questions. No sneaky glances at the last page.”

The narrator doesn’t exactly cheat on this commitment, but Ms. Setterfield, the author behind the narrator, does. The story doesn’t go directly from beginning to end; it comes to a seeming end and then backtracks to tell the same story from a different perspective which changes everything.

“In a single moment, a moment of vertiginous, kaleidoscopic bedazzlement, the story Miss Winter had told me unmade and remade itself, in every event identical, in every detail the same —yet entirely, profoundly different. Like those images that reveal a young bride if you hold the page one way, and an old crone if you hold it the other.”

I said that The Thirteenth Tale contains numerous references to Jane Eyre, and others have compared the book itself to Charlotte Bronte’s works. However, I think it’s much too wild and borderline insane to fit into the essentially staid and conservative Victorian world of the Brontes. In Jane Eyre, the madwoman spends most of her time locked in the attic, only escaping to bring the story to its denouement. In The Thirteenth Tale the insane run free, and the sane are required to hide in attics and closets. Futhermore, in The Thirteenth Tale and in The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins, the Victorian author I would compare Setterfield to, as madness runs amuck, spreading chaos and mayhem throughout the countryside, it becomes difficult to judge who is sane and who is mad and and who is telling the truth and who is lying and who is simply evil.

For sheer gothic fun and mystery, pick up The Thirteenth Tale. Oh, I almost forgot, if you love words, you’ll enjoy the language and style of this book, too. Note the quotations above, especially the second one. I had to look up “vertiginous”. It means “causing or having to do with vertigo.” What a great word!

Mixing Metaphors: Mudslinging Authors and Literary Daggers

Ariel at BittersweetLife is collecting quotations of great authors writing about one another. He seems to think these knd of quotations would be edifying and enlightening. However, I’m not sure what it says about my own personality that I immediately thought of the first quotation in the list below, Mark Twain on Jane Austen. I think the lesson here is that great authors are often NOT authorities on the work of other authors.

Mark Twain: “Jane Austen? Why I go so far as to say that any library is a good library that does not contain a volume by Jane Austen. Even if it contains no other book.”

William Faulkner on Mark Twain: “A hack writer who would not have been considered a fourth rate in Europe, who tricked out a few of the old proven ‘sure-fire’ literary skeletons with sufficient local colour to intrigue the superficial and the lazy.”

William Faulkner on Ernest Hemingway: “He has never been known to use a word that might send a man to a dictionary.”

Ernest Hemingway, in reply: “Poor Faulkner. Does he really think emotions come from big words?”

Thomas Macaulay: “From the poetry of Lord Byron they drew a system of ethics, compounded of misanthropy and voluptuousness, a system in which the two great commandments were, to hate your neighbor and to love your neighbor’s wife.”

Anthony Trollope: “Of Dicken’s style it is impossible to speak in praise. It is jerky, ungrammatical and created by himself in defiance of rules … No young novelist should ever dare to imitate the style of Dickens.”

Oscar Wilde on Dickens’ The Old Curiosity Shop: “One must have a heart of stone to read the death of Little Nell without laughing.”

Oscar Wilde again: “Mr. Henry James writes fiction as if it were a painful duty.”

Oscar WIlde, once again: “There are two ways of disliking poetry; one way is to dislike it, the other is to read Pope.”

Edward Gibbon on St. Augustine: “His learning is too often borrowed, his arguments too often his own.”

Robert Louis Stevenson on Matthew Arnold: “Poor Matt. He’s gone to heaven, no doubt, but he won’t like God.”

Samuel Johnson on Lord Chesterfield: “This man I thought had been a Lord among wits; but, I find, he is only a wit among Lords!”

Samuel Johnson on Thomas Gray: “Sir, he was dull in company, dull in his closet, dull everywhere. He was dull in a new way and that made people think him great.”

D.H. Lawrence on Walt Whitman: “This awful Whitman. This post-mortem poet. This poet with the private soul leaking out of him all the time. All his privacy leaking out in a sort of dribble, oozing into the universe.”

G.K.Chesterton: “Mr Shaw is (I suspect) the only man on earth who has never written poetry.”

T.S. Eliot on My Fair Lady: “I must say Bernard Shaw is greatly improved by music.”

Ezra Pound: “Mr Eliot is at times an excellent poet and has arrived at the supreme Eminence among English critics largely through disguising himself as a corpse.”

Alfred, Lord Tennyson: “Carlyle is a poet to whom nature has denied the faculty of verse.”

W.H. Auden on Alfred, Lord Tennyson: “There was little about melancholy that he didn’t know; there was little else that he did.”

W.H. Auden on Edgar Allan Poe: “An unmanly sort of man whose love-life seems to have been largely confined to crying in laps and playing mouse.”

Saki on Ralph Waldo Emerson: “Waldo is one of those people who would be enormously improved by death.”

Truman Capote on Jack Kerouac: “That’s not writing; That’s typing.”

Let me note that I agree with only a handful of these insulting remarks, and I will not tell you which ones those are. So, “[d]o you have a favorite quote, from a respected author/thinker, in which he/she comments on another author?” Inquiring minds want to know.

Shug by Jenny Han and Rules by Cynthia Lord



These two books have a lot in common:
1. Both are fiction, written for middle school age children, specifically twelve year old girls.
2. Both books feature a twelve year old girl as the protagonist.
3. Both are first novels for their respective authors.
4. Both stories are told in first person, present tense, which I found a bit odd. Especially in Shug, there were switches from present tense to past tense which were awkwardly handled. Is telling the story in present tense a new trend in YA fiction? I suppose it gives a sense of immediacy to the story, as if the reader is experiencing the action of the story along withe narrator instead of hearing about what happened in the past from an older and wiser teenager.
4. The themes are similar: first love, a family with secrets that are embarrassing, popularity and the struggle to fit in and be liked.
5. The plots are even similar: Girl meets boy, Girl makes friends with boy by helping him, Girl also befriends cool new girl in town, family problems embarrass Girl, Girl hurts boy’s feelings, they make up. A dance is the setting for the climactic action of both novels.
6. Both books have been nominated for the Cybil Award for Middle Grade Fiction, which is why I ordered them from the Harris County Library and read them.

So why did I like Rules so much and find Shug to be depressing and discouraging? I read Shug first and all I could think about throughout the entire 248 pages was how sad and difficult and hopeless Shug’s life was. I analyzed this feeling of gloom and realized that it wasn’t, as I would expect, because of Shug’s alcoholic mother that her life was so grim; it was because of the grim, cutthroat realities of middle school life. The Pecking Popularity Order is alive and well in Shug’s town and in her school especially. All the children in the book, who should still be playing games and squabbling over ice cream and dress up clothes, are instead worried about popularity, their first date, their first kiss, and who’s the prettiest. The children are cruel to each other, and although I’m under no illusions about how mean twelve year olds can be, I found the verbal cruelty in Shug to be particularly sad and if it’s true to life in the twenty-first century middle school, I’ve found another reason to homeschool.

If I wanted to be particularly harsh with myself, I could question my judgment and say that I liked Rules better than Shug because I find autistic children more sympathetic than alcoholic adults. However, there’s more to my preference for one book over the other than a preference for one problem over another. The children in Rules were sometimes unkind to one another; they made mistakes and needed forgiveness. But there was so much more grace in Rules; Catherine, the heroine of Rules, apologizes to the person she hurts because she is sorry, not because, like Shug, she’s calculating how unpopular she will be if she doesn’t apologize. Catherine loves her autistic brother, David, and shows it, even if she does become exasperated with the difficulties and embarrassments he brings into her life. Shug, on the other hand, has pretty much given up on her parents, not without reason. Shug’s reality should be more hopeful than Catherine’s; alcoholics do recover and become sober while autistic children don’t usually become un-autistic. Nevertheless, Shug’s only hope is to avoid her parents long enough to grow up and move out, but Catherine comes to a kind of peace about her brother and learns not to make his problems hers while still loving and communicating with him on his own terms.

If you want to read or recommend a middle school problem novel, I’d suggest Cynthia Lord’s Rules. Of course, it didn’t hurt a bit that one of the symptoms of David’s autism is that he uses the words of Arnold Lobel (Frog and Toad) to express his thoughts and feelings. Frog and Toad are much more fun than middle school back-stabbing.
And I like Catherine’s self-made rules: Pantless brothers are not my problem.

“I am laughing at you, Toad,” said Frog, “because you do look funny in your bathing suit.”

“Of course I do,” said Toad. Then he picked up his clothes and went home.

Another take on Shug from Jen Robinson at JKR Books.

Thanksgiving Center of the Blogosphere

Random thoughts of gratitude from the Queen of the Beehive. “I’m thankful for . . . the miracle of water that can boil, freeze, fill human cells, ripple, trickle and crash, steam, make creation bloom, obey God’s voice, make things clean, form vapor, steam and snowflakes, make earth inhabitable, and wave for the moon.”

Barbara Curtis (Mommy Life) is giving thanks for all she never had. “I’m grateful for the stability I never had. Divorce, foster homes, frequent moves and family separations were hard on me as a little girl, but blessed me with resiliency and endurance. They also make me appreciate the family Tripp and I have built and the roots we’ve put down now.”

Ariel at Bittersweet Life says that gratitude requires an Object, a Person to whom we give thanks. “Gratitude requires a personal object—and if thankfulness is to be deep and enduring, it must be pinned to Someone better than a changeful, error-prone human friend, good intentions aside.”

Taking Thanksgiving for Granted

For the past several months during our morning family devotional time, we’ve been going around the circle and each naming one thing that we’re thankful for that morning. The answers tend to be predictable and not terribly thoughtful or creative; we’re not all awake in the morning, and believe it or not, my children can be flippant at times. So they say: “sleep” or “my family” or “my house” or “my bed” or “Z-baby.” (I told you we were still sleepy.)

One of the urchins has lodged a protest; he thinks that the morning exercise in gratitude is forced and not really conducive to true thankfulness. He further says that we should save the naming of things that we appreciate for once a year, Thanksgiving Day. Somehow, naming the things we are thankful for daily devalues the sense of gratitude, according to Mr. Thankful-But-Not-Wanting-To-Say-So-Daily.

I disagree. Even if the things we name are trivial, and even if the gratitude we feel each morning is not always profound, just thinking about thankfulness each morning is an exercise that can, with time and persistence, produce a heart of gratitude. Like many, many other things in parenting and discipling my children, I can only compel the outward display of Christian virtue. The Holy Spirit must supply the inward change. So, I can require the children, or myself, to memorize Bible verses; I cannot change their hearts, or even my own, to make us want to obey the precepts in those verses. Does this mean the memorization is useless? No, it means that it is only a beginning, a turning toward that which is right and good; God can use the words of Scripture to change my attitudes and my behaviour.

Other examples:
I can require them to do math; I can’t make them love math or see its beauty as a reflection of the order that God has built into the universe.

I can compel outward obedience; I can’t compel an attitude of unselfish service.

I can make myself exercise; I can’t make myself enjoy the process.

I can make myself read the Bible; I can’t force myself to receive any benefit or blessing from doing so.

Disciplines, of gratitude or physical exercise or obedience or math, may lead to dull, spiritless habit, a glazing over of the spirit as the eyes lose their spark when we are bored or the same disciplines may lead to joy —joy in math or joy in physical activity or joy in thankfulness. Much depends on our attitudes and expectations about discipline itself, and much more depends upon the work of the Holy Spirit within the believer.

For all the blessings we have received and for all that we are about to receive, may the Lord make us truly thankful.
In the meantime, we’ll keep on practicing.

the curious incident of the dog in the night-time by Mark Haddon

I’m always a little late because I get most of my books from the library or the used bookstore. So I’m just now reading this book, published in 2003, that I remember lots of bloggers talking about last year. To add to the acclamation, I thought it was wonderful.

If you’ve never read the book or read about the book, it’s the story of Christopher John Francis Boone, age 15 years, 3 months, and 2 days, who decides to investigate the death under mysterious circumstances of a dog named Wellington. Christopher knows a lot of things —the names of all the countries of the world and their capitals, every prime number up to 7057, and the steps to take in detecting a crime ala Sherlock Holmes; however, he also knows that there many things he doesn’t understand —how to read the expressions on people’s faces, metaphors, and belief in the supernatural, to name a few. Christopher is autistic, and his autism causes him to observe things that other people don’t notice. It also causes him to discount things that can’t be explained logically. He’s good at math, bad at relationships.

In one part of his book, written in first person from Christopher’s point of view, Christopher discusses how he likes Sherlock Holmes, but dislikes Holmes’s creator, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. He dislikes Doyle because Doyle became interested in the supernatural, particularly seances and ghosts, after the death of his son in World War II. As I read, I was left with a picture of a boy who likes Sherlock Holmes because he’s safe and predictable, because he follows the logic of the fictional detective, but can’t stand the writer who made Sherlock Holmes because Doyle is more complicated and believes in things outside the conventions of fiction. Christopher is a boy who is limited by a quirk of the mind, although quite intelligent, limited to his “maths” and his science and his safe home and his strict version of literal truth.

And, for example, some people say how can an eye happen by accident? Because an eye has to evolve from something else very like an eye and it doesn’t just happen because of a genetic mistake, and what is the use of half an eye? But half an eye is very useful because half an eye means that an animal can see half of an animal that wants to eat it and get out of the way, and it will eat that animal that only has a third of an eye or 49% of an eye instead because it hsn’t got out of the way quick enough, and the animal that is eaten won’t have babies because it is dead. And 1% of an eye is better than no eye.

So, the ever logical Christopher reduces Irreducible Complexity to nonsense. Except, of course, Christopher’s explanation is itself nonsense. Half of an eye isn’t useful at all, and 1% of an eye is not better than no eye. If I have only a few rods and cones floating about with no cornea or retina or nerves leading to the brain or whatever, I have nothing. Such a thing would never evolve. And Christopher’s superior intelligence combined with an autism that causes him to miss out on many of the skills he needs to survive in human society is not an evolutonary adaptation that will make him more likely to survive and reproduce, but rather a seriously tragic handicap that requires the help of others and the bravery and resourcefulness of Christopher himself for him to transcend his own blindness and be able to live a real, connected life.

Christopher doesn’t believe in God, but his flawed, but loving parents and other people who help him to survive the journey that he embarks upon demonstrate the truth that God believes in Christopher and has provided a way for him to survive and even thrive in spite of his limitations. I wanted to quote to Christopher many times over the course of the story, “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

I really enjoyed the way author Mark Haddon was able to climb inside the mind of a high-functioning autistic young adult and present his thoughts to the reader. I don’t know if the book accurately portrays the thoughts and attitudes of an autistic person, but it feels right, and I liked Christopher in spite of his somewhat self-centered outlook on life. I wonder if Mr. Haddon knows someone or is close to someone who is autistic?

The curious incident of the dog in the night-time is short, thoughtful, and absorbing. It’s hopeful without being unrealistic about the problems facing both those with autism and their care-givers.