Archives

Anatomy of a Marriage

Gap Creek: The Story of a Marriage by Robert Morgan.

A Garden to Keep by Jamie Langston Turner.

When seventeen year old Julie Harmon marries her handsome young gentleman caller Hank Richards, neither of them has any idea of what it takes to make a marriage work or of what it’s going to take for them to make it economically as a family. They find out the hard way. Some of their troubles are their own fault, and some are the result of fire and flood and sickness and death and hard times. All of their own character flaws and the difficulties that come from outside combine to test their marriage and their commitment to each other. Gap Creek takes place in turn-of-the-century Appalachia, so the troubles are magnified and the consolations are few and far between. And Hank and Julie are so young, hard-working and persevering, but so very young and ignorant of the world. Julie has mother-in-law problems, and Hank can’t control his temper. But they both learn. Gap Creek is an excellent “anatomy of a marriage” book.

“I could never write a book that held together. My mind doesn’t stay still in one place long enough to follow through with a line of thought. It charges over the countryside, catapults through the air, and lands in a neighboring county, crosses state lines, leaps oceans, travels abroad.”

The couple in A Garden To Keep are older, around my age. Elizabeth Landis, the wife and the narrator in the book, is about fifty years old and dealing with a severe case of empty nest syndrome. Her son, Travis, has gone away to college for his freshman year, and her husband Ken is absent a lot, too, travelling for work or playing golf or just absent in spirit while bodily present. Elizabeth has a conversion experience at the beginning of the book, probably the least developed and believable part of the story, and then she finds out that her faith and her marriage are to be tested to the limit. The book jumps back and forth between past and present, profound and mundane, in a very satisfying way, just as real people think and weave thoughts about the realities of living with thoughts about the meaning of it all.

“One of us might venture on rare occasions to say something from deep inside, or it might slop out by accident, but there was never any real follow-up discussion of it. It would just hang there in the air for a while like a vapor. Our home was full of these vapors that had wafted up into the corners and coated the walls and ceiling over the years.”

Ken and Elizabeth have communication problems, and again Elizabeth has mother-in-law problems, mostly of her own making. Elizabeth and Ken must learn to talk to each other and to listen before it’s too late to save their marriage, a thing infinitely worth saving in spite of the deep hurts and infidelities that have brought it to the breaking point.

“But remember, marriage isn’t a little three-line Japanese haiku. It’s an epic poem handed down through many generations. If you give yourself to translating poetry, you will end up with a broader knowledge of language, so if I give myself to translating my marriage, maybe I’ll end up with a deeper understanding of love.”

Of the two books, Ms. Turner’s A Garden To Keep is the better story, more thought-provoking and meaningful. However, the two books together are a course in marriage; perhaps they should be assigned reading for couples who are preparing for marriage. I think some people, anyway, might learn more from a work of fiction like one of these books than from a multitude of how-to books on marriage.

Some other “anatomy of a marriage” books:

The Love Letters by Madeleine L’Engle. The importance of vows, the meaning of perseverance and forgiveness in marriage.

Kristin Lavransdattir by Sigrid Undset. Marriage between imperfect people, vicissitudes of of a difficult marriage between two stubborn, proud people.

War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy.

Other suggestions?

(Sidenote in large parentheses: My mom and I watched Walk the Line, the Johnny Cash movie, while I was in West Texas, which was sort of a marriage movie, but more of a beginning of the marriage, romance movie. I looked through my list of 107 Best Movies Ever and couldn’t find a single one that fit the “anatomy of a marriage” theme. Most of them end with the beginning of the marriage —which is to some extent when it just starts to get interesting. Camelot and Fiddler on the Roof deal somewhat with the theme of marriage and what makes or remakes a marriage, but that’s not the central theme of either movie. Can you think of any good movies that are about marriage, rather than about romance and weddings? Days of Wine and Roses? It’s really about alcoholism and its effect on a marriage. I can’t think of any. )

To This Great Stage of Fools: Born May 22nd

Today is the birthday of Arnold Lobel (b.1933), author and illustrator of many, many children’s books including, Frog and Toad Are Friends and Owl at Home. In fact, one biographer noted that Mr. Lobel died in 1987 leaving a legacy of over 100 books that he either wrote or illustrated. What a legacy!

The Frog and Toad Collection Box Set (I Can Read Book 2)
It’s an especially fine legacy since many of Lobel’s stories are memorable and thought provoking for adults as well as children. A long time ago a friend read me the story Cookies from the book Frog and Toad Together. In this tale, Toad makes some cookies, and then Frog and Toad try, unsuccessfully, to keep themselves from eating all the cookies. In the midst of their fight against temptation, Frog says that they need will power which he defines as “trying hard not to do something that you really want to do.” At the end of the story, Toad is sad because the cookies are all gone. Frog says, “Yes, but we have lots and lots of will power.” Toad is not consoled. Neither am I when left with useless will power but no cookies. And isn’t it true that when I need will power to resist temptation it’s never enough, and I only have plenty of will power in the abstract when there’s no real place to exercise it.
Other unforgetable stories include:
A List in which Toad loses his list of things to do and is paralyzed and unable to do anything
A Lost Button in which Toad loses his button and shouts this immortal rant, “The whole world is covered with buttons and not one them is mine!”
A Swim in which Toad looks funny in his bathing suit.
Tear-Water Tea from the book Owl at Home in which Owl thinks of sad things to make himself cry so that he can make tea from his tears.
Mouse Soup in which a mouse tells stories a la Sheherazade in order to keep from beng cooked into a weasel’s soup.

Lobel was a great story-teller himself, and I am indebted to him for many smiles and pleasant read-aloud times.

Some of Arnold Lobel’s books:

  • Small Pig (1969)
  • The Great Blueness (1970)
  • Frog and Toad Are Friends (1970) (A Caldecott Honor book)
  • Frog and Toad Together (1972) (A Newbery Honor book)
  • Owl at Home (1975)
  • Frog and Toad all Year (1976)
  • Mouse Soup (1977)
  • Grasshopper on the Road (1978)
  • Days with Frog and Toad (1979)
  • Fables (1980) (A Caldecott Medal winner)
  • Uncle Elephant (1981)
  • Ming Lo Moves the Mountain (1982)
  • The Book of Pigericks: Pig Limericks (1983)
  • The Rose in My Garden (1984)

Arnold Lobel Teacher Resources.

Book-Spotting #25

A compendium of book links for Monday:

I found this publishing imprint, called Persephone Books, via Danielle Torres, A Work in Progress. Persephone claims to reprint “forgotten classics by twentieth-century (mostly women) writers. Each one in our collection of seventy -two books is intelligent, thought-provoking and beautifully written, and most are ideal presents or a good choice for reading groups.” Persephone sees itself as a “feminist press,” but “our titles are different from those of other feminist publishers in that they are more accessible, more domestic, the feminism is ‘softer’.”
The books look to be, therefore, more accessible to traditional homemaking moms such as myself who want something to make us think , but not something designed to indoctrinate us in the dogma of the feminist cause. Just in a quick perusal, I found a novel called The Home-maker by Dorothy Canfield Fisher, an adult novel by Noel Streatfield about the family stress cause by the dislocations of World II (Saplings), and Good Things in England, a compendium of historical and literary recipes for traditional Britsh dishes such as frumenty and beef broth.

A list of LaShawn Barber’s favorite books.

Mother Reader gives us Twenty-one Ways to Give a Book. You know, you can give books anytime . . .

David Mills comments on Children of Men by P.D. James, both the book and the movie. Or there’s this scathing review of the movie by a fan of the book, Anthony Sacramone at First Things. The movie version is available on DVD now. I think it’s worth the time if you can tolerate the violence.

Marshall Zeringue muses on twice-told tales, novels based on other authors’ novels or plays. Eldest Daughter gave me a copy of Gertrude and Claudius by John Updike. I’m sure it will show up here on the blog after I’ve read it —unless I hate it. I’m trying to think of books that I like that are take-offs from other people’s books. I did enjoy the Nero Wolfe books that were written by Robert Goldsborough and the Lord Peter Wimsey mysteries by Jill Paton Walsh. Both of those authors made a special effort to take the beloved characters of the original authors and remain true to the original while involving them in further adventures. If you’re going to put a new twist on an old story, either in a book or in a movie, you must know that you’ve taken on a huge task. I think movie makers are not as good about giving credit and even homage to the original work while changing and extending it to fit their own vision. West Side Story was a great version of Romeo and Juliet, but it may be the exception rather than the rule. What books based on other books or movies based on books have you enjoyed? (I’m making a distinction here between faithful, or not-so-faithful, adaptations, such as LOTR (good) and Children of Men (maybe not so good), and completely new works that are based on older works, such as Joyce’s Ulysses or the movie O, Brother, Where Art Thou?, another version of the Odysseus story.)

In Newbery news, Nattie Writes has a Newbery Challenge —to read six Newbery Award books by the end of the year. Also, children’s literature fans need to check out The Newbery Project for more reviews of Newbery Award winning books.

The Carnival of Children’s Literature is up for May at Chicken Spaghetti. Don’t miss the fiesta!

Scroll down or click here for the Saturday Review of Books, May 19th. We’ve got reviews of all sorts of books, children’s literature and adult reading, fiction and non, classics and hot-off-the-presses.

Evangelism?

A scary film about motivating the evangelizers.

A much more thoughtful post on evangelism: the when, the where, and the how by Dr. Mark DeVine.

My very favorite evangelistic blog post (I wish I had written it!): “. . . what I want to invite you to explore is what Christianity really is, which is, actually, to experience what it means to be really human, really alive, pain and grief and all that as it really is. The difference, and of course you can’t know this until you’ve been on both sides, is that following Jesus actually gives substance to grief and pain and all those other hurts.”

May your Sunday be filled with Good News that gives substance and meaning to whatever you are experiencing in your life today.

Lloyd Alexander

Camille says that Lloyd Alexander died this morning.

 The obituary she linked to says he died “two weeks after the death of his wife of sixty-one years.” How poignant. He was in the US Army in WW II, stationed in Wales and working in intelligence and counter-intelligence. Now I know where he got a lot of the material for his fantasies.

 My favorite books by Mr. Alexander are Taran Wanderer and The Kestrel. Both of those books have strong, but vulnerable, male protagonists who bring out the mother-instinct in me. What are your favorite Alexander books?

LOST Rehash: Greatest Hits, or Charlie’s Gotta Die and Jack’s Gotta Lead

Best lines from tonight’s episode:

 Charlie: “Why does everything have to be such a secret? How about some openness for a change?”

 Jack: “We’re gonna blow’em all to h—!”

Naomi to Charlie: “Look on the bright side. You’re not really dead, right?” (Heavy irony)

 Sayid to Jack: “You said you were our leader. It’s time for you to act like one.”

Charlie to Desmond: “We both know you’re not supposed to take my place.”

 I loved Charlie’s list. Could you list the five best moments of your life? I may think about that for another post. Anyway, Charlie’s best and brightest list was illuminating. Will God catch Charlie when he dies just as his father caught him in the pool? Is Charlie really a hero as the woman said? (Yes!) Is he a “bloody rock star” even though he’s only had one hit record?

Apparently, Charlie lives a little while longer anyway. I think he’s doomed, though. Who are those Commando Ladies? And what will happen to Charlie’s ring left in Aaron’s cradle? Will Desmond wake up in time to escape whatever is going to happen to Looking Glass station?

The season finale episode is named Through the Looking Glass in imitation of Alice’s second adventure. What will happen is anyone’s guess, but I’m predicting:

Charlie’s death.

Locke’s reappearance.

Ben’s capture and maybe death.

Desmond has a headache.

Juliet has to spill some more secrets.

Did you notice that Ben said that Jacob told him to move the timetable up on the kidnapping? I maintain that Ben no longer hears from Jacob, if he ever did, and he’s using Jacob’s name to keep his “cult” members in line and make them carry out his (Ben’s) wishes.

Oh, and Rose and Bernard are back. This reappearance makes me and Lindsey (Just Enjoy the Journey) happy. Locke’s reappearance will not make me happy. Jack did better this episode. At least, he listened to Sayid, the real brains of this operation. And Hurley, the Wise Fool, sensed something was going on with Charlie. If they ever kill off Hurley, I’m done. No more LOST. The writers and producers have been warned.

Thinkling De’s liveblogging LOST again.

Hershey by Michael D’Antonio

Hershey: Milton S. Hershey's Extraordinary Life of Wealth, Empire, and Utopian DreamsI’m in West Texas for the week with my mom because my dad is in the hospital. And I’m craving chocolate.

I’m reading this history of the Hershey company and of Milton Hershey’s company town, Hershey, Pennsylvania in between visits to the hospital, and tonight I want a Hershey with almonds even though my dad is in the hospital for diabetes-related problems.

 According to the book, in the nineteenth century people thought chocolate could benefit all sorts of people: alcoholics, malnourished children, even factory workers. The factory workers supposedly would perform better and faster work with a dose of chocolate.

Nowadays, “some neuroscientists believe that chocolate, which stimulates the same areas of the brain activated by cocaine —the orbital frontal cortex and the midbrain —is addictive.”

As my urchins would say, “Duh.”  How many chocolate bars does one need to crave, obtain, and eat before knowing that the substance is at least psychologically addictive?

But it also “can improve your mood and may inhibit blood clotting.” Maybe I should take my dad a chocolate bar after all —unsweetened chocolate.

Book Character Meme

I found this book character meme at A Circle of Quiet. I added the last question because I thought it would be fun.

Three characters you wish were real so you could meet them:
1. Nero Wolfe, although he probably wouldn’t meet with me since I’m a woman. He’s somewhat gynephobic.
2. Elizabeth Bennett
3. Father Tim of Mitford

Three characters you would like to be:
1. Anne of Green Gables.
2. Jane Marple.
3. Madeleine. “To the tiger in the zoo, Madeleine just said, ‘Pooh, pooh.'”

Three characters who scare you:
1. Gulliver of Gulliver’s Travels.
2. Tom and Daisy Buchanan in The Great Gatsby.
3. Steerforth in David Copperfield.

Three characters you would welcome if they came courting your daughter:
1. Lord Peter Wimsey.
2. Curdie.
3. Faramir.

Shakespearean News

winedaleCelia: Here comes Monsieur Le Beau.
Rosalind: With his mouth full of news.
Celia: Which he will put on us as pigeons feed their young.
Rosalind: Then shall we be news-crammed.

From As You Like It.

Kenneth Branagh has a new Shakespeare film coming out. It looks as if Branagh is directing, but not acting, in this movie version of Shakespeare’s As You Like It. And as you can see in the trailer, the Forest of Arden has been moved to Japan?

Encyclopedia Kevinannica on Shakespeare for kids: “I believe that those readers eighteen years and younger would be betters served by reading Shakespeare in a modern language version. Go ahead and pick up your stones to throw at me.”

In The Guardian: “Charles and Mary Lamb’s Tales from Shakespeare was first published 200 years ago and has never been out of print. Marina Warner applauds a children’s classic created out of madness and matricide.”

Finally, Eldest Daughter will be spending her summer in Winedale/RoundTop, Texas. She’ll be an actor/student in this program, sponsored by UT-Austin, and at the end of the summer they all get to go to England! The plays for this year are A Comedy of Errors, Richard II, and Measure for Measure. You’re invited out to the barn theater at Winedale at the end of July/beginning of August to see this year’s production of all three plays.

The Theft and the Miracle by Rebecca Wade

Take a fat, pimply adolescent artist named Hannah and her good friend Sam whose father is in jail. Mix in a bit of witchcraft, evil witchcraft that is, an antique carving of the Virgin and the Christ Child, a cathedral, theft, vandalism, and a few miracles. With a talented writer in charge, you come out with a mystery thriller for young teenagers and fantasy fans that’s absorbing, suspenseful, and entertaining.

I’m a little wary of books that feature witches. I tend toward the very old-fashioned, but biblical, idea that witchcraft is evil. Well, in this book, it is. And if the theology in the book is a bit works-oriented, the story is at least filled with Biblical allusions and a plot that honors goodness and charity rather than selfishness and greed. The characters include a good bishop, a young protagonist who does her best to love others in a Christlike way (even though she’s not sure she believes in God), and a repentant vandal who asks for forgiveness. The book is moderately frightening in a suspenseful sort of way, but it’s not horror filled or violent.

I think this book may be the first book published in 2007 that I’ve read; I found it on the “new books” shelf at the library. It was a fun story, and I’d recommend it for middle school readers, sixth through eighth grades.