Archives

Sunday Salon: Books Read in February/March, 2010

Young Adult Fiction:
The Maze Runner by James Dashner. Semicolon review here.

How To Say Goodbye In Robot by Natalie Standiford. Quite odd, but sort of fun. This one made the Cybils YA fiction shortlist. If you read it, expect something totally different, like late night conspiracy-theory UFO radio. Review by Melissa at Book Nut.

In the Path of Falling Objects by Andrew Smith. Subtitled “the road trip from hell,” it really is. Not much fun. Two brothers back in the 1960’s find out that hitchhiking is a dangerous way to get to Arizona. I suppose you could use as a cautionary tale, even though it wasn’t meant to be that.

In a Heartbeat by Loretta Ellsworth. YA ARC about a heart transplant recipient and her donor. I’m giving this one to my ice-skating enthusiast friend who doesn’t read. Maybe he will.

Enthusiasm by Polly Shulman. Jane Austen fan-fiction with a present day setting.

Children’s Fiction:
Tuck Everlasting by Natalie Babbitt. Re-read for my Middle School girls’ book club.

Galveston’s Summer of the Storm by Julie Lake. Re-read for my Texas History class at co-op. Semicolon review here.

Winnie’s War by Jenny Moss. Re-read for Texas class.

Or Give Me Death by Ann Rinaldi. Re-read for girls’ book club.

Adult Fiction:
Janice Meredith by Paul Leicester Ford. Bestselling book of 1900. I read this one for the Books of the Century Challenge

SIster Carrie by Theodore Dreiser. Classic tale of a fallen woman who actually ends up with nothing worse than a feeling of vague discomfort with her pointless life.

Best Intentions by Emily Listfield. Sort of a murder mystery/thriller, but it’s really about marriage, and suspicions, and misunderstandings. Good insights into the disintegration of trust in a marriage and how that can happen.

Black Narcissus by Rumer Godden. I want to see the movie version of this book. I can picture Deborah Kerr as the head nun, Sister Clodagh.

Crossers by Phillip Caputo. Very violent with gratuitous sex, but also insightful about the U.S./Mexico border wars. Crossers are people who cross the border illegally, for whatever reason, mostly drugs or economic opportunity.

The Other Side of the Bridge by Mary Lawson. Ms. Lawson’s second published novel made me want to read her first entitled Crow Lake.

Mr. Emerson’s WIfe by Amy Belding Brown. I wonder if Ralph Waldo Emerson was really as difficult and cold as this novel portrays him. The story is that of Lidian Jackson Emerson, RWE’s second wife and the mother of his four children.

Unleavened Bread by Robert Grant. Another best-selling book of 1900. This one reminded me of Sister Carrie, which I had just finished when I read it, of Main Street by Sinclair Lewis, and also, curiously, of a biography of Huey P. Long that I read a long time ago. The ending was somewhat unsatisfactory since no one “got what they deserved.” And the main character, Selma, deserved to get it.

We Have to Talk About Kevin by Lionel Shriver. Very introspective, depressing, and thought-provoking.

The Widow’s Season by Laura Brodie. A ghost story with insight into the seasons of grief and recovery.

Triangle by Katharine Weber. I think my friend Hannah would like this book since it’s not only about the famous Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, but also about music. And it’s a history mystery.

How Do I Love Thee? A Novel of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Poetic Romance by Nancy Moser. Historically accurate for the most part, both in facts and in tone, this novel captures the Victorian era and the poets of the day quite well. I would like to read more about Robert Browning in particular, a very interesting man.

Nonfiction:
Safe Passage by Ida Cook. Recommended by Magistramater. I want to give this one to someone I know who’s looking at saving up to do something big someday. The sisters in this book deny themselves all sorts of pleasures so that they can travel to hear their favorite opera singers.

At Large and At Small: Familiar Essays by Anne Fadiman. Essays about such varied subjects as Charles Lamb, lepidopterists, ice cream, circadian rhythms, literary criticism, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, coffee, and flag-flying. I enjoyed every one of them. What essayists do you recommend?

Truce: The Day the Soldiers Stopped Fighting by Jim Murphy. World War I and the Christmas, 1914 spontaneous cease-fire.

Mornings on Horseback by David McCullough. The March Semicolon Book Club selection, and a lovely pick, if I do say so myself.

Sixpence in her Shoe by Phyllis McGInley. I’ve taken to keeping a book of essays next to my bed, and this one was the follow-up to Ms. Fadiman’s book. Ms. McGinley is much more practical and not as likely to lead me to add other authors to my TBR list. That’s a good thing since my TBR list is way too long anyway. On the other hand, I would like to read more of Ms. McGinley’s poetry and prose, so I guess she added to my list anyway.

The Little Stranger by Sarah Waters

This book was either frustrating in the extreme, despite the absorbing plot and characters, or else I just didn’t get it. It ended in the way that many of us fear LOST (the TV series) will end: ambiguously and without answers. Consider yourself warned.

I enjoyed reading The Little Stranger, but I enjoyed reading it because I thought I would find an explanation for the suspenseful events of the novel by the end. If you read The Little Stranger hoping to find out what is causing strange things to happen at Hundreds Hall, you will be disappointed. The book has drawn comparisons to Edgar Allan Poe and to Henry James’s The Turn of the Screw, but there is a difference. When I read The Turn of the Screw, I was also frustrated by the ambiguity and the unresolved ending. But as I thought more about it, I realized that one could choose how to interpret the book, there were “plausible” answers to the questions raised in the books and there were more supernatural possibilities. But there were answers. The Little Stranger is not so satisfactory in this regard. All of the people in the book could be insane, but that’s hardly likely. There could be actual ghosts at Hundreds Hall, but since everyone experiences the ghostly events in the book quite differently, that solution doesn’t satisfy either. As a third possibility, some real person could be producing the supernatural effects at Hundreds Hall for some nefarious purpose, but it’s not clear how that could be true either. In fact, it seems impossible –which brings us back to insanity or a multitude of ghosts.

Some ambiguity at the end of a book, or a TV series, is acceptable. Total confusion and anticlimactic dissatisfaction is not. It’s the difference between fiction and real life: in real life sometimes I must resign myself to never knowing how the story ends because “we see through a glass darkly.” I want my fiction to have an ending.

Other bloggers say:

Fleurfisher: “It made me want to go back and look at things again, and this could well be a book that has much more to offer with subsequent readings. And the ending? It’s subtle and could be read in more than one way.”

Stephen Lang: “It is beautifully paced, full of subtle observations and quite simply a pleasure to read. It is also one of the most effective, chilling and original ghost stories I have read for some time. I finished The Little Stranger a few days ago but, still thinking it through, I have been unable to start a new book.”

Nicola: “It did not end the way I had expected and I was quite shocked with the outcome and actually quite annoyed that things ended up the way they did. I’ve had time to recuperate now, but that is the sign of good characterization, when a book’s characters mean so much to you that you are invested in them and want all to end well for them all.”

Sunday Salon: Semicolon Book Club

The February selection for the Semicolon Book club was Till We Have Faces: A Myth Retold by C.S. Lewis. Till We Have Faces was Lewis’s last work of fiction, and he considered it his best. The particular “myth retold” is that of Cupid and Psyche. It’s a story Lewis considered retelling over the course of many years.

Lewis’s diary, September 9, 1923: “My head was very full of my old idea of a poem on my own version of the Cupid and Psyche story in which Psyche’s sister would not be jealous, but unable to see anything but moors when Psyche showed her the palace. I have tried it twice before, once in couplet and once in ballad form.”

He actually wrote the book in 1955, and it was published in 1956.

Links to read more about other readers’ responses to Till We Have Faces:
The Well at the World’s End
A Great Gulf Fixed: The Problem of Obsessive Love in C.S. Lewis’ Till We Have Faces by Amelia F. Franz.
Till We Have Faces at love2learn.net
Heather’s not a fan.
Kevin Stilley on Till We Have Faces.
A library is the hospital of the mind: Till We Have Faces.
Further Up and Further In: A Way into Till We Have Faces.
Marian Powell at BookLoons.
Peter Kreeft on TIll We Have Faces (audio) Excellent, though long (sermon length), and well worth your time to listen.

A few questions to ponder:

According to Orual, the gods are unknowable, whimsical, cruel, capricous, nasty, mean-spirited, not trustworthy, demanding. Why do the gods appear to her in this way and to Psyche as the opposite? How can a rational, thinking person come to the point of faith? If God is good, why is he so mysterious and hidden?

How does Orual’s love for Psyche become something evil and hateful? Is this transformation true to life? Can our human love for spouse, family, and friends become obsessive and even evil? How and why?

Till We Have Faces ends the same way the Book of Job ends–with questions unanswered. Is this a satisfying ending? Why does God not answer Orual’s complaint? Why does God not answer Job’s complaint?

Applicable Biblical references:

“He who loves his life loses it, and he who hates his life in this world will keep it to life eternal.
If anyone serves Me, he must follow Me; and where I am, there My servant will be also; if anyone serves Me, the Father will honor him.” John 12:25-26

Then Job answered the Lord and said,
2 “I know that You can do all things,
And that no purpose of Yours can be thwarted.
3 ‘Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?’
“Therefore I have declared that which I did not understand,
Things too wonderful for me, which I did not know.”
4 ‘Hear, now, and I will speak;
I will ask You, and You instruct me.’
5 “I have aheard of You by the hearing of the ear;
But now my eye sees You;
6 Therefore I retract,
And I repent in dust and ashes.” Job 42:1-6

“For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.” I Corinthians 13:12

If you read Till We Have Faces, either this month or earlier, please leave your thoughts or a link to your post about the book in the comments. When I get back from my Lent break, I’ll add your links to this post.

Await Your Reply by Dan Chaon

Miles’s twin brother Hayden has been missing for ten years. Every year or two Miles receives a letter or an email or a phone call that sends him off on another wild goose chase to locate and perhaps rescue his mentally disturbed, possibly criminal, brother.

A few days after graduation Lucy Lattimore leaves her hometown in Ohio in a Maserati with her high school history teacher. He takes her to Nebraska to a deserted motel on the edge of a dried-up lake, and there she begins to notice that Mr. George Orson may not be exactly the man she thought he was.

Ryan Schuyler drops out of college and goes on the road with his long-lost con man dad, Jay. Ryan’s OK with using stolen identities and using computers to move money from one bank account to another, but he’s puzzled about unreadable email he’s getting written in Cyrillic script. What’s that all about?

What do these three stories, these several lives, have in common? Author Dan Chaon has woven an intricate web of lies, deceit, multiple identites and personalities, and stories told, believed and rejected to make up this novel about a Great Imposter. I was, of course, reminded of the original Great Imposter, Ferdinand Waldo Demara.

I was also reminded of an old friend who admired Demara and took him as something of a role model. My friend, “Bill,” was something of an imaginative storyteller himself, always looking for ways to aggrandize himself and his own history. He used multiple names and told people that he was a colonel in the Air Force or a rabbi or private detective. He was a member of several churches, and he loved to talk about the Bible and about Jesus Christ. I truly think Bill believed his own stories, at least while he was telling them. As far as I know Bill never did anything criminal, but he did have a few close calls in which people to whom he had told different stories met up with one another and compared notes. It was a sad thing to watch from the outside, and yet Bill truly loved people. And people loved him, usually even when they found out that he was not completely trustworthy. Bill died a few years ago, and his funeral was attended by many, many people who knew at least parts of him and loved the man they knew.

The identity chameleon in Chaon’s novel, Hayden Cheshire, is similarly charismatic and even more enmeshed in his own lies. The novel is a convoluted walk through Hayden’s convoluted life from the points of view of his victims, those who fall for his lies and fall for Hayden’s charm. If you’ve never met anyone like Bill or Hayden, you might find aspects of the novel unbelievable, but let me assure you, it could happen. Hayden is believed by his brother to be schizophrenic or to have a personality disorder, but he is also quite capable of shedding personalities and identities and taking on new ones and juggling schemes and bank accounts and destroying lives as he passes through them.

I found this novel to be both fascinating and disturbing, and although the ending was a bit abrupt and unresolved, I recommend it to anyone who is interested in the themes of deceit and imposture and identity theft. You’ll find a lot to ponder in this near-attack on very idea of fixed identity.

I thought this paragraph in Chaon’s acknowledgements at the back of the book was interesting since I’m always interested in literary influences. Mr. Chaon writes:

“This book pays homage, and owes a great deal, to many fantastic and better writers who inspired me, both in childhood and beyond, including Robert Arthur, Robert Bloch, Ray Bradbury, Daphne du Maurier, John Fowles, Patricia Highsmith, Shirley Jackson, Stephen King, Ira Leven, C.S. Lewis, H.P. Lovecraft, Vladimir Nabokov, Joyce Carol Oates, Mary Shelley, Robert Louis Stevenson, Peter Straub, J.R.R. Tolkien, Thomas Tryon, and a number of others. One of the fun things about writing this book was making gestures and winks toward those writers I’ve adored, and I hope that they —living and dead—will forgive my incursions.”

I did notice some of those gestures and winks, but reading that statement made me want to re-read the book and look for the ones I missed.

Janice Meredith by Paul Leiscester Ford

OK, so older is not always better. The bestsellers of today are sometimes full of gratuitous sex and violence, without much depth of character and devoid of significant meaning.

Janice Meredith, one of the ten best selling novels of 1900, didn’t have any sex, other than a few stolen kisses, and the violence of the American Revolution was described somewhat obliquely through the eyes and experiences of the noncombatants, Janice and her mother. For example:

“Only with death did the people forget the enormities of those few months, when Cornwallis’s army cut a double swath from tide water almost to the mountains, and Tarleton’s and Simcoe’s cavalry rode whither they pleased; and the hatred of the British and the fear of their own slaves outlasted even the passing away of the generation which had suffered.”

Nevertheless, the character development in Janice Meredith is poor, and by today’s standards, the book could have been edited down from 503 pages to about half that. Janice herself begins the novel as a giddy teenager reading romance novels and indulging in romantic fantasies, and she ends the novel, after having bounced from one suitor to the next and back over a dozen times, indulging in her new romantic fantasy of marriage to dashing young officer with her father’s reluctant permission.

The characters of the Revolution –George Washington, Cornwallis, General Gates, General Lee, and others—appear with as much historical accuracy as can be expected in a romance novel. The battles and the deprivations that the people experience as the war drags on seem real, and if the language is little flowery, the descriptions are at least based on fact.

The main problem with the novel was that I never really liked wishy-washy little Miss Meredith. She never knew what she wanted. SHe ran away with one man and was fetched back by her parents. She promised herself in marriage to at least four different men over the course of the novel in return for their help to her and her family as they attempted to navigate the vicissitudes of war. Janice’s father promised her to several different men, usually the same ones Janice affianced, but at differing times. It made for several confusing reversals of plot, and Janice ended up seeming fickle and willing to give herself in marriage to the highest bidder.

If all of the bestsellers of 1900 are like this one, I feel sure that:

a) most of the books on the bestseller list must have been purchased and read by women. I can’t imagine any man reading through 500 pages of this.
b) surely Dickens’ and Thackeray’s heroines were a relief to the ladies of 1900 after reading about Miss Janice. At least Dora (David Copperfield) knows she’s found a good man in David, and Becky Sharp (Vanity Fair) could have transplanted herself to the New World and had a whopping adventure in the time it took Janice to dither around, flirt with half the British army, and then end up where she began with a penniless and somewhat immature American fiance.

Footnote: I looked up the author, Paul Leicester Ford, and his life, or more particularly his death, would make a rather lurid novel. (In fact this NY TImes article about Ford’s death reads like a novel. Ah, the good old days of yellow journalism!) Ford wrote biographies as well as novels, and his subjects were several of the founding fathers, including Washington. So I’m guessing his facts and characterizations are, as I said, quite accurate.

Semicolon Book Club: Esther by Chuck Swindoll

This post necessarily combines thoughts about the book of Esther in the Bible and about Chuck Swindoll’s commentary on Esther, titled Esther: A Woman of Strength and Dignity. Mr. Swindoll’s book is the January selection for the Semicolon Book Club, and I chose it because the women of my church will be discussing and studying the book of Esther in early March at our yearly women’s retreat.

The first observation I read in any commentary, Bible study guide, or study of the book of Esther I picked up was that Esther is the only book in the Bible that never mentions God.

Ray Stedman (quoted in Swindoll’s Esther): “For many this little book is a puzzle, for it seems to be out of place in the Bible. There is no mention in it of the name of God; there is no reference to worship or faith; there is no prediction of the Messiah;there is no mention of heaven or hell–in short, there is nothing religious about it, at least on the surface.”

Matthew Henry (also quoted in Swindoll’s book): “But though the name of God be not in it, the finger of God is directing many minute events for the bringing about of His people’s deliverance.”

Swindoll: “When I come to this book that never mentions God, I see Him all the more profoundly and eloquently portrayed throughout it. It’s there in invisible ink. Just like life. I’ve never seen skywriting that says, ‘I’m here, Chuck. You can count on me.’ I’ve never heard an audible voice in the middle of the night reassuring me, ‘I’m here, My son.’ But by faith I see Him, and inaudibly I hear Him on a regular basis, reading Him written in the events of my life–whether it be the crushing blows that drive me to my knees or the joyous triumphs that send my heart winging.”

It’s probably not an original thought with me, but one of the things this “God-in-the-background”, God as the Silent Orchestrator of all things, made me think of was the writing of fiction by Christian authors. Why wouldn’t the book of Esther be a wonderful model for Christians who write fiction?

I’m not saying that the book of Esther is a fictional account. I believe it’s true history. I also see the hand of God very clearly in the events that are recounted in Esther. However, the human author of Esther felt no need to point out to his readers that God was the one who moved the heart of King Xerxes to love and listen to Esther, that it was God who preserved the Jewish people from annihilation by their enemies by manipulating events and moving people to do His will. And yet it’s so obvious. God is the main character in the book of Esther without his ever being named.

Wouldn’t it be a challenge to a Christian author to see if one could write a God-permeated book without ever mentioning God or prayer or worship or faith? Even better, what about a book filled with the teaching and person of Jesus that never tells the reader exactly what to think and what words to use and how to define Jesus’ presence in the world?

I’m not talking about a book with some vague new-age spirituality. I just wonder if a book that presented the gospel of Jesus Christ without ever telling the reader exactly what it was doing and what to think about it might be more of a paradigm shifter than a book that preaches explicitly. Fantasy can do something like this if it’s done skillfully (Tolkien, C.S.Lewis), but I believe it can be done with regular realistic fiction, too. I just don’t know of very many Christian authors who are writing that kind of book.

So Esther made me think about how we write and read and present stories. It also made me think about how God works in our wold and how often we can miss His presence if we’re not looking with eyes of faith. God is at work all of the time. But we don’t always have eyes to see or ears to hear. I have people I’m praying for who seem as lost as they’ve ever been, in whose lives I see nothing of God’s hand. That doesn’t mean that God isn’t at work. But it may be a while before I can see it. I may never see the complete picture this side of heaven. Esther may not have had any idea that God was at work in her elevation to the position of queen. But He was.

Key passage from the book of Esther: Esther 4:12-16

When Esther’s words were reported to Mordecai, he sent back this answer: “Do not think that because you are in the king’s house you alone of all the Jews will escape. For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance for the Jews will arise from another place, but you and your father’s family will perish. And who knows but that you have come to royal position for such a time as this?”

Then Esther sent this reply to Mordecai: “Go, gather together all the Jews who are in Susa, and fast for me. Do not eat or drink for three days, night or day. I and my maids will fast as you do. When this is done, I will go to the king, even though it is against the law. And if I perish, I perish.”

Where has God placed you for just such a time as this? What is He calling you to do?

Love Story by Erich Segal

LONDON — Erich Segal, the Ivy League professor who attained mainstream fame and made millions sob as writer of the novel and movie Love Story, has died of a heart attack, his daughter said Tuesday. He was 72. More . . .

I haven’t thought about Love Story in ages, but I was one of those weepy teens back in the 70’s who came, saw, and cried. I have enjoyed seeing a much older (wiser?) Ryan O’Neal on the TV series Bones.

Sunday Salon: Looking Forward To . . More Books

The Sunday Salon.comThe Last Summer of the Death Warriors by Francisco X. Stork, coming March 1, 2010 from Arthur A. Levine Books. Brought to my attention by Mitali at Mitali’s Fire Escape.

The Crossing Places by Elly Griffiths. Recommended by Caite. A mystery, first in a series, set in England, sounds sort of P.D.James-ian. I’m in.

The Ever-Breath by Julianna Baggott. Recommended by Melissa of the Bonny Glen.

Agatha Christie’s Secret Notebooks by John Curran. Reviewed by Fleurfisher. Due to be published in February, 2010.

The Unbearable Lightness of Scones by Alexander McCall Smith. Publication date: January 12, 2010. I generally like anything Mr. McCall Smith writes.

The Book of Fires by Jane Borodale. This debut novel just looks interesting: mid-eighteenth century London, a fireworks factory, a hidden and illegitimate pregnancy, comparisons to Jane Eyre and A Year of Wonders.

Tea with Hezbollah: Sitting at the Enemies Table Our Journey Through the Middle East by Ted Dekker and Carl Medearis. Publication date: January 26, 2010. Sounds fascinating. “Through powerful narrative Tea With Hezbollah will draw the West into a completely fresh understanding of those we call our enemies and the teaching that dares us to love them. A must read for all who see the looming threat rising in the Middle East.”

Heist Society by Ally Carter. Publication date: February 9, 2010. Katarina Bishop is an ex-con artist from a family of thieves, pulled back into a life of crime by the need to protect her father. This book is the first in a new series by the author of the Gallagher Girls books.

Keeping the Feast by Paula Butterini. Publication date: February 18, 2010. A memoir set in modern-day Europe about a couple of journalists who marry and then have to deal with injury and loss.

The History of the Medieval World: From the Conversion of Constantine to the First Crusade by Susan Wise Bauer. Publication date: February 22, 2010. I probably won’t read this one straight through, but rather I’ll enjoying browsing and reading bits and pieces and using it as a reference book. However, it’s one that I am looking forward to in particular.

Epitaph Road by David Patneaude (Egmont, March 2010). Summary from ARC: In 2067, an airborne virus wiped out 97 percent of the male population. Thirty years later, women rule the world and have ushered in a new golden age on Earth. Poverty, crime, war, and hunger have all disappeared. Growing up in this utopia, fourteen-year-old Kellen Dent feels isolated as one of the few males alive. When a rumored outbreak of the virus threatens Kellen’s outcast father, he knows that he must warn him of the coming danger. During his desperate race to find his dad, Kellen uncovers a secret so frightening that his life and the future of the world will never be the same. Found at the blog of Abby the Librarian.

This Body of Death: An Inspector Lynley Novel by Elizabeth George. Publication date: April 20, 2010.

The Double Comfort Safari Club by Alexander McCall Smith. Publication date: April 20, 2010.

Clementine, Friend of the Week by Sara Pennypacker. Publication date: July 27, 2010.

The as-yet-untitled third book in the Hunger Games series (available August 24, 2010).

They Never Came Back by Caroline B. Cooney. Recommended by Jen Robinson.

I’ve found these hither and thither as I’ve been reading blogs. Thanks to those who have recommended these my TBR list is even longer than it was before.

Sometimes a Light Surprises by Jamie Langston Turner

OK, right up front, this one is not my favorite Jamie Langston Turner title. That honor might go to A Garden to Keep or maybe the first book I read by Ms. Turner, Winter Birds. I supppose I’d have to say I liked Some Wildflower in My Heart better than this one, too.

And still Sometimes a Light Surprises is a nice slow ride through the psyche of an older man, Ben Buckley, who has encased himself in ritual and hidden himself in books and wordplay and is now living in a “gated community of [his] own making.” He’s walled himself off because of the death of his wife Chloe, murdered by an unknown assassin nearly twenty years before. After Chloe’s death, Ben withdraws emotionally from his four children and becomes an unapproachable, unloving father. I never did quite understand what Ben had done to make his family, especially his daughter Erin, quite so angry with him. He seems to have been an emotionally distant, but decent, father. He gave the children financial support, but not much love and caring. I would have liked a couple of flashback scenes or memories in which I could have read about exactly how Ben’s neglect of his children affected them. However, we are told that it did, and that has to be enough.

The book switches from one point of view to another frequently, and in addition to Ben Buckley, the reader is introduced in turn to:

Kelly Kovatch, a young Christian homeschool graduate whose mother, Kay, is dying of cancer,
Caroline Mason, Ben’s cranky and nosy secretary, who discovers a secret and doesn’t know what to do about it,
Erin Buckley Custer, Ben’s estranged and barren daughter,
and a host of minor characters who are mostly well-realized and interesting in their own right.
It would have been easy for Ms. Turner to go off on a tangent, telling us the stories of any one of the minor characters, and it almost feels as if she did that when Caroline and Erin, in particular, occupy center stage and the spotlight moves from Ben Buckley and his limited life to the people around him and how they interact with other people, some of whom never even come into contact with the main character. In this sense, the novel sometimes reads like a set of intertwined short stories or novelettes: one about Kelly Kovatch and her coming to terms with singleness, one about Caroline and her thirst for intrigue and significance, and another about Erin and her struggles with wanting a child and distrusting her father’s attempts at mending their broken relationship, and a final over-arching narrative about Ben Buckley.

The book should be enjoyed for what it is: an attempt at writing Christian fiction in which the characters are complicated and some of the issues remain unresolved at the end of the story. I do think I know what Ms. Turner was trying to do. In fact, she telegraphs her intentions in a scene where Kelly, who is also Mr. Buckley’s employee, visits her mother’s grave:

“I read one of those Christian novels you gave me, and I hated it,” Kelly said suddenly. . . . I mean I hated the fact that everything came out so happpy at the end, because it didn’t seem real. The girl acted too perfect, even when things went wrong, and then the man came along at just the right time and loved her at first sight, and at the end they overcame all their problems and got married . . . of course, they got married. Everybody gets married. The whole world gets married. Somebody ought to write a novel that doesn’t turn out so—”

This novel doesn’t turn out so, and Ms. Turner is to be commended for writing such compelling characters. I like character-driven novels. However, a little more plot in the next novel might be nice.

Advanced Reading Survey: Barchester Towers by Anthony Trollope

I’ve decided that on Mondays I’m going to revisit the books I read for a course in college called Advanced Reading Survey, taught by the eminent scholar and lovable professor, Dr. Huff. I’m not going to re-read all the books and poems I read for that course, probably more than fifty, but I am going to post to Semicolon the entries in the reading journal that I was required to keep for that class because I think that my entries on these works of literature may be of interest to readers here and because I’m afraid that the thirty year old spiral notebook in which I wrote these entries may fall apart ere long. I may offer my more mature perspective on the books, too, if I remember enough about them to do so.


Author: As Anthony Trollope’s mother, Frances, and his older brother were both writers, Trollope was following in a well-established family tradition when he bagan writing novels. Barchester Towers is the second novel in a group of six on the theme of clerical life in Victorian England.
“Of all novelists in any country, Trollope best understands the role of money. Compared with him even Balzac is a romantic.” — W. H. Auden

Characters:
Dr. Proudie: newly appointed bishop of Barchester.
Mrs. Proudie
Dr. Grantly: archdeacon.
Mr. Slope: Dr. Proudie’s chaplain.
Eleanor Bold: a young widow.
Mr. Septimus Harding: Mrs. Bold’s father.
Charlotte Stanhope
Bertie Stanhope
La Signora Madeline Vesey Neroni
Mr. Arabin

Summary:
Bishop Proudie and his unpopular and managing wife are the new occupants of the see of Barchester. As Mrs. Proudie interferes in almost all the cathedral affairs, the bishop’s chaplain, Mr. Slope, makes himself disliked by his pursuit of Eleanor Bold, a wealthy young widow and daughter of Mr. Harding, the warden of the hospital and hero of Trollope’s previous novel, The Warden. Church politics rule the day, until all misunderstandings and double dealings are unravelled, and romance wins out in the end.

Quotations:
“Till we can become divine we must be content to be human, lest in our hurry for a change we sink to something lower.”

Mr. Arabin: “It is the bane of my life that on important subjects I acquire no fixed opinion. I think, and think, and go on thinking, and yet my thoughts are running ever in different directions.”

“There is no way of writing well and also of writing easily.”

“There is no happiness in love, except at the end of an English novel.”

I do think I need to read more Trollope.

Bonnie reviews Barchester Towers.
Becky’s Book Reviews on Barchester Towers.
Between the Covers: Barchester Towers A-
Carol at Magistramater.