Archives

Biographies of the U.S. Presidents

I’m participating in only a couple of reading challenges this year, and the one I’m most enjoying so far is the U.S. Presidents Reading Project. I have a goal of reading one biography of a president per month, and I’m on target, having finished a biography of Washington and having read about halfway through John Adams by David McCullough. Here’s a list of some of the biographies I plan to read for this project. If you have any suggestions for the presidents whose names have no biography listed, or if you think I should choose another book other than the one I have listed, please leave any and all suggestions in the comments.

1. George Washington, 1789-97 Washington: The Indispensable Man by James Thomas Flexner. Semicolon review here.

2. John Adams, 1797-1801 (Federalist) John Adams by David McCullough. I also plan to watch the mini-series based on this book.

3. Thomas Jefferson, 1801-9 (Democratic-Republican) I’ve taken a dislike to Jefferson after the Washington biography (not too much Jefferson in the John Adams book yet, but Jefferson probably won’t be a hero in that one either). So I’m not sure which Jefferson bio to choose, one that’s flattering to restore my faith in this rather contradictory and enigmatic president, or one that’s iconoclastic to reinforce my antipathy.
Beth Fish reviews Twilight at Monticello by Alan Pell Crawford.

4. James Madison, 1809-17 (Democratic-Republican) The Great Little Madison by Jean Fritz. Yes, this one is a children’s book. I plan to read children’s books for some of these presidents because sometimes they’re better than the adult tomes. And I may use the children’s biographies in future school years. And reading a children’s biography may tell me whether or not I want to read more about a particular president.

5. James Monroe, 1817-25 (Democratic-Republican) James Monroe: The Quest for National Identity by Harry Ammon.

6. John Quincy Adams, 1825-29 (Democratic-Republican) The Life and Times of Congressman John Quincy Adams by Leonard L. Richards.

7. Andrew Jackson, 1829-37 (Democrat) American Lion: Andrew Jackson in the White House by Jon Meacham. This one is displayed prominently in the bookstores, and it looks interesting.
Also, there’s Old Hickory: Andrew Jackson and the American People by Albert Marrin.

8. Martin Van Buren, 1837-41 (Democrat)

9. William Henry Harrison, 1841 (Whig) Mr. Jefferson’s Hammer: William Henry Harrison and the Origins of American Indian Policy by Robert M. Owens

10. John Tyler, 1841-45 (Whig) John Tyler, the Accidental President by Edward P. Crapol

11. James Knox Polk, 1845-49 (Democrat) Polk: The Man Who Transformed the Presidency and America by Walter R. Borneman.

12. Zachary Taylor, 1849-50 (Whig)

13. Millard Fillmore, 1850-53 (Whig)

14. Franklin Pierce, 1853-57 (Democrat)

15. James Buchanan, 1857-61 (Democrat)

16. Abraham Lincoln, 1861-65 (Republican) Whereas with several of preceding presidents there is a dearth of good biographies to choose from, for Abraham Lincoln, it’s more like an embarrassment of riches. Which biography of LIncoln should I read? Maybe, Commander and Chief: Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War by Albert Marrin. I like Mr. Marrin’s books.

17. Andrew Johnson, 1865-69 (Democrat/National Union) The Avenger Takes His Place: Andrew Johnson and the 45 Days That Changed the Nation by Howard Means.

18. Ulysses Simpson Grant, 1869-77 (Republican) Grant: A Biography by William McFeely.
Or, Unconditional Surrender: U. S. Grant and the Civil War by Albert Marrin.

19. Rutherford Birchard Hayes, 1877-81 (Republican) Fraud of the Century: Rutherford B. Hayes, Samuel Tilden, and the Stolen Election of 1876 by Roy Morris Jr. Read, 2014.

20. James Abram Garfield, 1881 (Republican) Dark Horse : The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield by Kenneth D. Ackerman

21. Chester Alan Arthur, 1881-85 (Republican) Gentleman Boss: The Life of Chester Alan Arthur by Thomas C. Reeves.

22. Grover Cleveland, 1885-89 (Democrat) To the Loss of the Presidency (Grover Cleveland a Study in Courage, Vol. 1) by Allan Nevins.

23. Benjamin Harrison, 1889-93 (Republican)

24. Grover Cleveland, 1893-97 (Democrat) Grover Cleveland: A Study in Courage by Allan Nevin. (2 volumes)

25. William McKinley, 1897-1901 (Republican) In the Days of McKinley by Margaret Leech.

26. Theodore Roosevelt, 1901-9 (Republican) Mornings on Horseback: The Story of an Extraordinary Family, a Vanished Way of Life and the Unique Child Who Became Theodore Roosevelt by David McCullough
Theodore Roosevelt and the Rise of Modern America by Albert Marrin.

27. William Howard Taft, 1909-13 (Republican)

28. Woodrow Wilson, 1913-21 (Democrat) Woodrow Wilson: Princeton to the Presidency by W. Barksdale Maynard.

29. Warren Gamaliel Harding, 1921-23 (Republican) Florence Harding: The First Lady, The Jazz Age, And The Death Of America’s Most Scandalous President by Carl Sferrazza Anthony (Read, January, 2105). Wow, Harding was a cad and a person of low character. I didn’t finish or review this bio because it was so depressing.
The Strange Death of President Harding by Gaston B. Means and May Dixon Thacker.

30. Calvin Coolidge, 1923-29 (Republican) A Puritan in Babylon: The Story of Calvin Coolidge by William Allen White OR The Autobiography Of Calvin Coolidge by Calvin Coolidge.

31. Herbert Clark Hoover, 1929-33 (Republican)

32. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1933-45 (Democrat) Franklin and Winston: An Intimate Portrait of an Epic Friendship by Jon Meacham. I rather like Churchill, FDR not so much, so this one sounds like something I could enjoy and learn from. *I actually read and enjoyed FDR and the American Crisis by Albert Marrin in October, 2015.

33. Harry S. Truman, 1945-53 (Democrat) Truman by David McCullough. 1993 Pulitzer Prize winner.

34. Dwight David Eisenhower, 1953-61 (Republican) Ike: An American Hero by Michael Korda.
My Three Years with Eisenhower by Captain Harry Butcher.
Crusade in Europe by Dwight Eisenhower.

35. John Fitzgerald Kennedy, 1961-63 (Democrat) I might just re-read Profiles in Courage in lieu of a biography of this overrated (IMHO) president.

36. Lyndon Baines Johnson, 1963-69 (Democrat) The Years of Lyndon Johnson: Master of the Senate, Volume 3 (2003 Pulitzer Prize for biography) by Robert Caro.

37. Richard Milhous Nixon, 1969-74 (Republican)

38. Gerald Rudolph Ford Jr , 1974-77 (Republican)

39. James Earl Carter, 1977-81 (Democrat) An Hour Before Daylight: Memories of a Rural Boyhood by Jimmy Carter

40. Ronald Wilson Reagan, 1981-89 (Republican) Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary Man Became an Extraordinary Leader by Dinesh D’Souza

41. George Herbert Walker Bush, 1989-1993 (Republican)

42. William Jefferson Clinton, 1993-2001 (Democrat)

43. George W. Bush, 2001-2009 (Republican)

44. Barack Hussein Obama, 2009- (Democrat)

I guess for most of the presidents I haven’t decided on a biography or related book. I’m taking suggestions, folks.

LOST Rehash: The Little Prince

SPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERSSPOILERS

Jin’s back! We knew he couldn’t really be dead. Is anyone really, truly, without a doubt, never to revived, dead as a doornail, dead on this island? Boone, Shannon, Locke’s dad Cooper, all those Dharma people and redshirt Losties, Ana Lucia and Libby, Mr. Eko, Charlie? I suppose they’re dead, but if we’re going to rewind Island time, why couldn’t we rewind to before they died and start again there? And if we did, would it change anything?

“Marley was dead: to begin with. There is no doubt whatever about that. The register of his burial was signed by the clergyman, the clerk, the undertaker and the chief mourner. Scrooge signed it. And Scrooge’s name was good upon ‘Change, for anything he chose to put his hand to. Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail.
Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail.”

And yet Marley’s ghost returns. And yet Jin’s near-dead body washes up on shore in another time and place. And I think John Locke is Hamlet. Hamlet’s been talking to his father’s ghost when that confused and indecisive Danish prince complains:

The time is out of joint: O cursed spite,
That ever I was born to set it right!

Of course, Locke is the prince, the anointed one, who’s supposed to set the island right in time and space. But whereas Hamlet was supposed to accomplish his father’s revenge, Locke has another mission: to bring back the wandering Losties who have left the fold and become lost in their lies and deceit.

I’m sure the title of this episode mostly refers to Antoine de Saint-Exupery’s fantasy, Le petit prince. Interesting that the book was originally written in French, and Danielle’s French contingent shows up on the beach in this episode. Also, Aaron’s sort of in the middle of everything (a little child shall lead them?), and I suppose he’s also the “little prince” of the title. I don’t really understand why Aaron is so very important, but he’s another “special” child, isn’t he?

Speaking of special children, why was it OK for Walt and Michael to leave the island, but not for Jack, Kate, Sun, Hurley, Sayid and Aaron? What’s Walt doing these days anyway? Growing up, I reckon.

What’s going on between Ben and Sayid? Sayid was working for Ben, but now Sayid doesn’t trust Ben and wants to save Hurley from Ben’s influence and machinations. It’s almost as if Ben has some kind of control thingie implanted in Sayid; Sayid’s eyes go dead as soon as Ben enters the picture. Maybe it’s similar to the kind of control he planted in Sawyer (or didn’t plant in Sawyer). Something weird is going on there.

Everyone in Jumping Around Island Time is starting to hemorrhage. Except for Locke, Sawyer, and Faraday. Maybe Charlotte and Miles were on the island as children? And Juliet’s been there longer than Sawyer and Locke. Why are only the Losties jumping around in time and not Danielle’s French people or the Canoe People or Richard’s people or the Dharma people? Who are the Canoe People, anyway? Am I forgetting something?

I’m sure I’m forgetting lots of things.

Best lines go to Sawyer as usual: “Thank you, God!” “I take that back!”
And, Sawyer to Juliet: “Yeah, time travel’s a b—!”

Worst attempt at being profound: Locke says, “I needed that pain to get where I am now.” But the question is: where is he now, and is it such a great place (or time)? I still don’t like Locke, never have, probably never will.

Worst love quadrangle: Jack still loves Kate. Sawyer loves Kate, too. Kate still doesn’t know whether she’s with Jack or Sawyer. Juliet always gets stuck with the leftovers. But Sawyer’s unstuck in time with Juliet, not Kate. And Kate says she’s “always been with you, Jack.” If you can’t be with the one you want, love the one you’re with?

If you’re down and confused
And you don’t remember who you’re talkin’ to
Concentration slip away
Cause your baby is so far away.
Well, there’s a rose in a fisted glove
And the eagle flies with the dove
And if you can’t be with the one you love
Love the one you’re with
Love the one you’re with

Not suggesting those lyrics as guidance for life, just drawing connections. Leave your connections and links at the Lost Books Challenge blog.

Till next week . . .

Reading Through Texas

I’m working on an assigned booklist, readers if you will, for a class that will be taught to sixth graders next year in our homeschool co-op. The class is supposed to incorporate literature and Texas history. So, I’ve been reading books about Texas: historical fiction, biographies, memoirs, short stories, nonfiction, poetry if I can find any. So far I have the following books that I’ve already read and evaluated to some extent:

We Asked for Nothing: The Remarkable Journey of Cabeza de Vaca (Great Explorers) by Stuart Waldman. Mikaya Press, 2003. I haven’t actually looked at this book yet. I’d like to have something on the list about early explorers and something about the Native Americans who lived in Texas, but I’m having trouble finding good, recommended titles to evaluate on either of those subjects. Any suggestions?

The Boy in the Alamo by Margaret Cousins. Fiction set in the Alamo, 1836. Corona Publishing, 1983. Ms. Cousins very much presents the Texans’ side and the traditional account of the Alamo story through the eyes of her fictional hero, twelve year old Billy Campbell. Billy runs away from home and follows his older brother Buck who has joined Davy Crockett’s Tennessee Volunteers. Sherry Garland’s account (see below) is more nuanced and therefore more thought-provoking, but Ms. Cousins’ story gives the basic traditional outlines of the story of the Alamo as the Texians experienced it and may be more appropriate as an introduction for sixth graders.

In the Shadow of the Alamo by Sherry Garland. Gulliver Books, 2001. This book is different because it’s told from the perspective of a Mexican boy, Lorenzo, who’s conscripted into Santa Anna’s army and forced to fight the Tejanos at the Alamo and at San Jacinto. It may be a little too graphic and mature for some sixth graders.

Inside the Alamo by Jim Murphy. If the fictional accounts are too hard to find in sufficient quantities (The Boy in the Alamo) or too advanced for our sixth graders (In the Shadow of the Alamo), I may go with this nonfiction book by award-winning author JIm Murphy.

Make Way for Sam Houston by Jean Fritz. Putnam, 1998. Biography of famous Texan general, president, and governor Sam Houston.

Come Juneteenth by Ann Rinaldi. Slavery in Texas during and after the Civil War. Harcourt 2007. I read this book a long time ago. Is it too mature for sixth graders?

Wait for Me, Watch for Me, Eula Bee by Patricia Beatty. Fiction set in West Texas, 1860’s. William Morrow and Company, 1978. I also read this one a long time ago, but I remember it as exciting with some good things to discuss about family loyalty and cultural engagement.

Cowboys of the Wild West by Russell Freedman. Nonfiction, late 1800’s. Clarion Books 1995. I have this one on my shelf, lots of pictures, a good break from fiction for those who prefer their information in a nonfiction format.

Old Yeller by Fred Gipson. Texas frontier, 1860’s. Harper Classics, 2001. Old Yeller. Classic. Natch.

Search for the Shadowman by Joan Lowery Nixon. Bantam Doubleday Dell, 1996. Set in contemporary times, this story would be a good introduction to a family history/genealogy unit since it tells about a boy who researches his own family history and discovers facts that may be better kept secret. There are a few holes in the plot, and some of the information on how to use computers to research genealogy are a little dated, but most kids probably won’t notice. The historical part is set in c.1876-1888, so I put it here is the list to keep to chronological order.

The Texas Rangers by Will Henry. Landmark book/out of print. I haven’t seen this one either, and it may be too difficult to get copies for all our students. But I would like to have something about the Texas Rangers.

Galveston’s Summer of the Storm by Julie Lake. Fiction set during Galveston Hurricane of 1900. TCU Press, 2003. I reviewed this book a couple of years ago, and I liked it very much. I said then: “Lots of historical detail, information about sailing ships and steam trains, and book characters that make the history come to life all make this book an excellent choice for middle grade (3-6) readers and classrooms.” Unless someone else knows of a better book on the Galveston Hurricane of 1900, this one will be on the list.

Mooonshiner’s Gold by John R. Erickson. Fiction set in Texas Panhandle, 1926. Viking 2001. Great action-packed adventure with engaging characters and a lot of history sneaking in through the back door. John Erickson is known for his Hank the Cowdog series, but this stand-alone adventure is just a good as the Hank books and should be just the right reading level for most sixth graders.

The Underneath by Kathi Appelt. I’m hesitant to include this one even though I loved it. It does have some seriously evil villains, and the Native American mythical elements may bother some people in our (very conservative) co-op. I think it would have to be introduced to the class with care and enthusiasm. But it’s such a good book! Semicolon review here.

Holes by Louis Sachar. Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 1998. I think this one might be a good book to end the year. It’s set in a sort of mythical, contemporary Texas, and it ought to be fun for the kids to talk about the plot and the characters in relation to their own lives and experiences.

Any help, comments, suggestions, you can give, I will appreciate. I know there’s lots more fiction set in and around the Alamo. Which one is the best? I don’t have anything set during the Civil War except for Come Juneteenth, which may be too mature for sixth graders. Nor is there anything set during the Dust Bowl era, the Great Depression, or World War II and the latter half of the twentieth century.

Also, most of the books feature a male protagonist. Any girl-y books about Texas that you all can recommend? Poetry? Short story collections?

7 Quick Takes Friday

1

The Guardian has a list of Ten of the Best Butlers in Literature, and it doesn’t include Jeeves. Is that because he’s a valet, not a butler? According to Wikipedia:

Jeeves is a valet, not a butler. However, Bertie Wooster has lent out Jeeves as a butler on several occasions, and notes that “if the call comes, he can buttle with the best of them”.

2

the-james-challenge1
I saw this idea at Beyond Homemaking’s Seven Quick Takes, and it looks like such a great mind-sharpener and spiritual boost. Only two problems: I already have 12 (huge) projects for the year, and If I do this memorization project, I want to memorize something else, not James. Maybe Philippians, as Sara mentions in her post.

3

Speaking of projects, Friday Quick Takes would be a good time to check in on my projects and update you and myself on how I’m doing.
Bible Reading Project: I have been reading II Samuel 1-8 all month, but not every day. I’ve decided that I don’t like David very much right now. His sons turned out rotten, and I don’t need that kind of discouraging example in my life right now.
February: I Thessalonians. Maybe I should take it as my memorization project.

4

For my Newbery Project, I was trying to read the Newbery winners and honor books in order from 1923 when the award was first given until now. I haven’t picked up on that yet, but I am reading Holes by Louis Sachar, the winner of the 1999 Newbery Medal. So far, I can say it’s fantastically weird, but I think I kind of like it.

5

For Operation Clean House I was supposed to clean out the dressing area and closet in January. I got the dressing area, but the closet is untouched. Maybe this afternoon and tomorrow.

6

LOSTBooksbutton
For my LOST Reading Project, I signed up for the LOST Books Challenge and chose some books to read. Now I just need to get reading.

7

For my US Presidents Reading Project, I read Washington: The Indispensable Man by James Thomas Flexner (Semicolon review here). In February, I’m going to start on John Adams by David McCullough, which happens to be the Semicolon Book Club selection for March.
US Presidents Reading Project home page.

Thanks for dropping by. See you next week for more project updates and random book and homeschool thoughts. Right now, I’ve got to get on that closet.

LOST Rehash: Jughead

First, you should read J. Wood on last week’s double episode.

For four seasons we’ve watched the narrative jump from the island time to flashbacks and flashforwards, and we’ve had to piece together events in order to make sense of the storyline and locate ourselves in relation to that storyline. This is just what the island characters are forced to do now; piece together out-of-order events to make sense of them, and locate themselves in relation to those events. In this way, the experiences of the watchers and the watched converge through the narrative.”

Yeah, and then some. The whole time travel thing is messing with my mind. Computer Guru Son said something that helped: each character is on his on timeline/road, and when those timelines intersect may be one time for one character and another for someone else. For instance, Locke meets WIdmore in 2007 (?three years after the crash) when Locke is time-travelling back to the past. But Widmore should remember, in 2007, meeting Locke and Faraday and Sawyer and Juliette on the island when WIdmore was just a youth. (I still don’t understand why Desmond forgets, until his nightmare, that he already met Faraday.) Locke remembers all the times he has met Richard Alpert, as a boy in California, on the island, but in the 1954(?) time travel event, Alpert had not yet met Locke. In fact, Locke wasn’t even born yet. It’s still very confusing for me, and it helps to write it out like that. I am sometimes a bear of very little brain.

In his piece on last week’s episodes, Mr. Wood also talks about what he calls, after another author, Paul RIcoeur, “cosmological time (time that’s measured; minutes, hours, days) and phenomenological time (time as experienced; past, present, future).” I’m assuming that these terms are the same as Madeleine L’Engle’s chronos and kairos. L’Engle defines chronos as ordinary clock time and kairos as God’s time, in which notions of past and present are irrelevant. In kairos it is possible to arrive at a place and time in a sort of circular route before you ever left it. I wonder if Jack and the rest of the Oceanic Six will return to the island in 2007 or before they left in 2004, perhaps taking advantage of what Wood calls a wormhole or what L’Engle names her book, a wrinkle in time.

Oh, and did you notice that Faraday’s abandoned girlfriend is “unstuck in time”, too? And we still don’t know who the good guys are and who the bad guys are. Is Widmore an evil exploiter, or is he the benefactor of a sick and helpless victim of Faraday’s dangerous experiments? Or both? If Ben is fighting Widmore, is he a good guy? Who is Abadon and for whom is he working? Is Faraday bad because he abandoned the girl in the bed (Theresa Spencer), or is he good because he’s trying to save the island and Charlotte? But can Faraday be good if he’s working for Widmore?

Awwww, Penny and Desmond have a baby! And Penny’s loyal to the end, even when it looks as if Desmond is headed back to the Island. Can Penny go there, even if she wants to? And they named the baby Charlie. Awwww.

No books or literary references in tonight’s episode that I caught, but next week’s episode is called The Little Prince.

“Men occupy very little space on Earth. If the two billion inhabitants of the globe were to stand close together, as they might for some public event, they would easily fit into a city block that was twenty miles long and twenty miles wide. You could crowd all humanity onto the smallest Pacific islet.
Grown-ups, of course, won’t believe you.”
Le petit prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupery

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry first published The Little Prince in 1943, only a year before his Lockheed P-38 vanished over the Mediterranean during a reconnaissance mission.

Go to the LOST Books Challenge blog to leave a link to your thoughts on this episode of LOST.

Semicolon Book Club: January

We just adjourned the first meeting of the Semicolon Book Club for 2009. We discussed the two book selections for January:

Heaven by Randy Alcorn.

Heaven: Your Real Home by Joni Eareckson Tada.

There were only three of us in attendance, but we really enjoyed discussing the joys and possibilities of heaven, the place where we will live forever at home with the God who made us, redeemed us, and loves us eternally. I printed out this 2003 Christianity Today article by Peter Kreeft, and we discussed some of these “thirty-five frequently asked questions about eternity” in relation to the two books and to Scripture.

The most exciting idea that we talked about was the thought that not only will there be no more sin in heaven, but we will not have any desire to sin. Peter Kreeft writes about it like this:

Will we be free in Heaven? If so, will we be free to sin? If so, won’t anyone ever exercise that freedom?
“Freedom to sin” is a contradiction in terms, like “freedom to be enslaved.” Free choice is only the means to true freedom, “the freedom of the sons of God,” liberty.
In heaven we will not sin because we will not want to. We will freely choose never to sin, just as now great mathematicians do not make elementary mistakes, though they have the power to do so. In Heaven we will see the attractiveness of goodness and of God so clearly, and the ugliness and stupidity of sin so clearly, that there will be no possible motive to sin.
Now, we are enslaved by ignorance. Every sin comes from ignorance, for we sin only because we see sin as somehow attractive, which it is not, and goodness as somehow lacking in attraction. This is an ignorance that we are responsible for, but it is ignorance, and without that ignorance we would not sin. In Heaven, in the “beatific vision” of God, overwhelmed and filled with the total joy of goodness, baptized with goodness as a sunken ship is filled with water, no one could possibly ever want to turn from this perceived glory. Now, “we walk by faith, not by sight”(2 Cor. 5:7). Heavenly sight will not remove our freedom. Ask the blind whether sight would remove their freedom.

Can you imagine such perfect freedom? Joni talks about this kind of freedom in her book, too. Not only will she have a perfected body that will obey her will and mind and do all sorts of things that her now paralyzed body is unable to do, and not only will she have a perfected mind that will learn easily and happily and will enjoy both God and His creation, she will also have a perfected will that is perfectly in tune with that of the Creator, a will that only desires to do His will because we will be able to see Him face to face and understand that His will is always best.

And that’s why there will be no more tears. We will know HIm even as we are known.


Joni, in her book, playfully sets up meetings with friends and acquaintances: “I’ll meet you in Oregon for skiing and a cup of hot chocolate.” That kind of thing. I’m going to say that I’ll be in the Celestial Library, worshipping the Lord with my new mind (the one that doesn’t forget stuff), and I’ll meet anyone who wants to join me there to talk about all the wonders of what God has made.

If you are an online member of the Semicolon Book Club, or if you’re interested in joining in, the February selection is The Love Letters by Madeleine L’Engle. It’s out of print, but available, used, from Amazon sellers for a pittance. Just click on the cover picture to get to the Amazon page.

And here’s a special linky for those of you who posted about either Heaven by Randy Alcorn or Heaven: Your Real Home by Joni. Thanks for reading along.

1. Amy@Hope Is the Word (Joni Eareckson Tada)
2. Semicolon (Randy Alcorn)
3. Semicolon (Joni and Schuyler\’s Monster)
4. Carrie K. (Heaven, post 1)
5. Carrie K. (Heaven, post 2)

Powered by… Mister Linky’s Magical Widgets.

Poetry Friday: Hurley Needs a Cool Code Name

Dude, are you OK? You’re looking kinda….goth.

Great, go look down the burning death hole!

Dude, that was like a. . . jedi moment.

Back home, I’m known as something of a warrior myself.

We’re lost on an island, running from monsters, boars, freaking polar bears.

Locke’s out in the jungle killing stuff.

The numbers are bad.

Did either of you see a guy run through here…in a bathrobe…with a coconut?

I just go along with it, ’cause I’m along for the ride. Good old fun-time Hurley.

I like that I like chicken?

The torch near the dynamite thing, not making a whole lot of sense to me.

Let’s look Death in the face and say, ‘Whatever, man!”

Did that bird just say my name?

So, like, the hatch blew off your underwear?

Attention Others. Come in Others.
best stay away from our beach…

Can’t believe you’re just giving him Australia. Australia’s the key to the whole game.

I don’t wanna see the ocean.

Dude, I’ve been having regular conversations with dead people.

The last thing I need now is paranoia.

Never say never, dude.

OK, as poetry it’s severely lacking in form, rhythm, and other poetical elements. However, it works for me as a sort of shorthand summary of Hurley’s experience on the island (LOST) and our experience as viewers trying to understand and assimilate all the plot lines and themes and numerous strands of the show that is LOST. In other words, I’m having fun.

Check in with Laura Salas for some real poetry on this Friday.

My LOST Reading Project

Scroll down or click for my thoughts on last night’s episode of LOST. I’m joining Amy’s LOST Books Challenge in which “(p)articipants are asked to choose at least five books off the list of books alluded to or mentioned on the show to complete by the time the series concludes in 2010. If participants did not complete the first challenge, they can use those same books again. Find books here, here, or here.”

LOSTBooksbuttonMy books (subject to change):

Island by Aldous Huxley.

On Writing by Stephen King.

The Third Policeman by Flann O’Brien.

The Stone Leopard by Colin Forbes.

Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut. I’ve never read this (cult?) classic, and I figure I ought to?

I’ve chosen five, and I may choose more. I may start some of the above selections and not be able to finish. I’ve done a lot of that for some reason this month. Anyway, I’m looking forward to reading some of these and correlating them to LOST as the season progresses. If you’ve already read any of the books I’ve chosen, tell me what you thought.

Go here to sign up for the LOST Books Challenge.

LOST Rehash: Because You Left and The Lie

I just got through three hours of LOST, and to tell the truth, as Hurley insists we should always do, I’m a little bit disappointed. The season premiere at any rate seems to be all about action and adventure and chases and people getting shot, not much character development and no interesting relationship stuff. I’m NOT talking about the Kate/Jack/Sawyer triangle, just relationships and friendships and even enmities. There wasn’t anything new about the people themselves.

Hurley doesn’t trust Ben. Hurley’s mom believes in him. Sun doesn’t like Ben, and she blames him for Jin’s death. Sayid and Ben have had a falling out. Locke’s not really dead, or else he’s going to come back to life on the island. Faraday has a mother, probably the white-haired lady whose name I don’t remember. Widmore’s evil, which is no surprise to anyone.

There was some graphic violence and general nastiness, but no “wow!” moments when I thought “Man! That blows my mind!” I’m glad Faraday is becoming a key player on the island, that he’s the only one who has any idea what’s going on. I don’t like the idea that Locke is so special that he, and only he can save the island (save the world?). I don’t like Locke, never have.

Questions:

Where did the flaming arrows come from? Dharma people? Or someone else?

Why didn’t Desmond remember meeting Faraday before outside the hatch? Way before at Oxford?

Where are Claire and her dad while the island is moving around in time?

What’s with the compass that Richard gave Locke?

Walt’s special. Locke’s special. Desmond’s special. Ben’s special. How many “special” people are there?

What was Faraday doing under the Orchid Station with the Dharma people?

What’s this thing Miles has with dead people —and dead boars? And Miles corrects Sawyer’s nicknames?

I’m still in for the duration, but I hope they get some interesting character development in the mix because I don’t want to spend the entire season watching people run around the dark jungle and getting flashed through time and Jack and the rest of the Oceanic Six chasing each other and trying to form a posse.

If you posted about LOST, whether you got more out of it or less, leave a comment, and I’ll link.

Shannon loved it, even though it “messed with my mind,” at Rocks in My Dryer.

Amy thinks it’s going to be a great season.

Robyn’s kinda lost.

Joanna’s a hopeless addict, and her mind is buzzing with questions and theories.

Sarah asks, “When am I?”

My Friend Amy loves Faraday, too.

Michelle at Pridelands Mommy is also happy that Fraday is going to be a key character this season.

Friend Donna doesn’t like Faraday. She thinks he’s sneaky and pretentious. C’mon, Donna, he’s a lovable physics nerd. What’s not to like?

Lisa thinks Charlotte is Ben’s little childhood playmate. Only her name was Annie, wasn’t it?

Crystal has lots of questions and observations.

Bay at Queen Mother blog likes seeing dead people pop up again.

Everyday Mom thinks Locke is really dead, but that the island will bring him back to life.

Oh Amanda does a recap of both of last night’s episodes with some lovely insights along the way.

Bobbi says there was a whole lot of flashing going on.

Go here to sign up for the LOST Books Challenge.

I loved linking to everyone’s LOST posts, but I think next week I’ll put up a linky for everyone to sign in and link.

Schuyler’s Monster by Robert Rummel-Hudson

Schuyler’s Monster: A Father’s Journey With His Wordless Daughter.
Robert Rummel-Hudson’s blog: Fighting Monsters with Rubber Swords.

Yes, this book is about a little girl named Schuyler (pronounced Skylar) with a brain malformation called bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria. This condition, probably congenital in Schuyler’s case, can cause several problems, but Schuyler’s main, most obvious problem is an inability to speak. The author, Schuyler’s dad, tries to focus on both Schuyler’s communication issues and her underlying vibrant personality. She comes across as a friendly, strong-willed, and somewhat mysterious little girl with a profound speech disablity.

However, the book is as much about the author himself as it is about Schuyler. Robert Rummel-Hudson is a self-described smart-ass and an agnostic. He’s funny and snarky, but his agnosticism is the theme that ties this autobiographical tale of a father together. He’s agnostic in regard to God and also in relation to a good prognosis and future for Schuyler. He doesn’t “have much use for Christianity” before Schuyler is born or diagnosed, but after he learns what her disability is called and what difficulties and suffering it involves, Mr. Rummel-Hudson becomes enraged with a God that he doesn’t really believe exists in the first place. If there were a God, he would be “God, my enemy, the bully who’d reached down and damaged my angel’s mind.” Schuyler’s dad can’t be an atheist because he sees that atheism requires as much faith as deism. However, since he has no faith, which he equates with certainty, he can’t believe in God or not believe. Nor does he believe that there is any purpose or meaning to Schuyler’s suffering. He is left with a vague Hope, a hope that, despite evidence to the contrary, he and his wife will be able to find someone or something that will help Schuyler to live a happy life, a fulfilling life. (Happiness and independence and fulfillment are the highest goods in Mr. Rummel-Hudson’s pantheon.)

YesI haven’t lived through anything nearly as tragic and difficult as Mr. Rummel-Hudson’s life with his daughter, Schuyler, so I can’t criticize his anger and hostility toward God, nor his later resignation to the idea that some kind of impotent God may exist and be unable to do anything to help Schuyler. I might very well feel the same way were I in his shoes. However, it’s interesting that I was also reading the first few chapters of Joni Eareckson’s book Heaven: Your Real Home today. In the book, Joni talks about her disability (paralysis) as both a curse and a blessing. She longs for heaven where she is assured of having a new body that will enable her to do all the things she can’t do here on earth. In that sense, she longs to escape her broken body that has brought her so much pain and suffering and denial of pleasure for so many years. However, she also says that her disability is, in a strange way, a blessing: “Somewhere in my broken, paralyzed body is the seed of what I shall become. The paralysis makes what I am to become all the more grand when you contrast atrophied, useless legs against splendorous resurrected legs. . . Whatever my little acorn shape becomes, in all its power and honor, I’m ready for it.”

Now, I’m not Joni either, and I’m not paralyzed or seriously disabled in any way. But I can see that we’re all broken in lots of ways, mentally, physically, and most of all spiritually, and that before we can “get fixed” we have to believe that there’s a Fixer and that He cares enough and is powerful enough to fix us, if not in this life, then someday in Heaven. And if Joni’s disability and suffering help her to know and trust the Fixer, then she’d say it’s worth it. That attitude isn’t much help to the agnostics of this world who, despite their need, are unwilling (not consciously needy enough?) to jump into the arms of the Only One who can meet that need. But Schuyler herself may grow up to see God and her need for Him in a way that her father can only hope to understand.

I pray that she does. And that her father, Mr. Rummel-Hudson, somehow comes to rely on God instead of a rubber sword.