Archives

Sunday Salon: 52 Things That Fascinate Me

The Sunday Salon.comColleen at Chasing Ray wrote this post about the the places, people, and ideas that fascinate her and infuse her writing. She got the idea, in turn, from this post on writing by author Kelly Link.

What I decided to do was to sit down and, very quickly, make a list of things that I most liked in other people’s fiction — these could be thematic, character driven, very general or very specific. I found that when I started this list, it began to incorporate ideas and items which I was inventing as I went along.

I like this sort of exercise, even though I’m not an author, maybe a writer, but not an author. Anyway, these are the themes and things that fascinate me:

1. Community. Communities. How a subculture develops around a shared interest like bicycling or collecting butterflies or playing Scrabble (Word Freak by Stefan Fatsis) or any other random interest. How those communities work and how they coalesce. What the rules are. How they resolve conflict.

2. Education, particularly homeschooling and education/growing up outside the box. Educational freedom and the limits to that freedom. Unschooling.

3. Insanity, mental illness, and mental differences and disabilities. Everything from schizophrenia to autism to deafness and blindness and how those affect perceptions and ideas. Where do we draw the line between insanity and eccentricity? How does blindness affect the way a person thinks about the world?

4. Religious cults and religions other than Christianity. How do these groups answer the Big Questions of life?

5. Eccentric people, collectors, people who live outside the box. How and why do they do it?

6. Old houses full of old stuff.

7. The Civil War. Not so much the war as the time period and the rationalizations and reasons people gave for their actions. The relationships between masters and slaves. The ambivalence in the North about black people in general and especially enslaved black people.

8. Historical Christianity: Celtic Christianity, Eastern Orthodoxy, Nestorians, Coptic Christians, other groups that developed their own cultures around the message of Jesus Christ.

9. Idealism. Don Quixote tilting at windmills and dreaming the impossible dream.

10. Broken relationships. Scarlet and Rhett. Arthur and Guinevere. Can broken relationships be mended? How? How well? Will the cracks always show? Do we need to be broken to be rebuilt into something stronger and more lasting?

11. Wordplay. For example, Alice in Wonderland or the novels of P.G. Wodehouse. I wish I could write like Lewis Carroll or like Wodehouse or even Norton Juster (The Phantom Tollbooth).

12. Anorexia, cutting, alcoholism, drug abuse, depression, self-destructive tendencies in general. This one may not be a very healthy fascination, but it goes back to #3. How do people go “off track,” and how do they return? Where is the line between healthy and unhealthy, between repression, balance, and dissolution, between normal and abnormal?

13. Secret passageways. Secret rooms. Hidden or isolated cottages. Hermits. Aloneness.

14. Small town communities and cloistered communities. Again back to the community. How does a community form? How does it sustain itself? What happens when there are conflicts and broken relationships within the community?

15. Genius. Intelligence. What is intelligence? What can it do, and what are its limits? The Wise Fool.

16. Con artists and liars. A long, elaborate con. Ethical dilemmas like when is it wrong to tell the truth? Is it OK to lie when the Nazis ask if you have Jews hidden in your house? Isn’t a murder mystery the unravelling of an intricate con game? The Great Imposter.

17. Old photographs.

18. Names and naming. What names mean. The origins of certain names. What naming someone does for that person. Nicknames.

19. Biblical allusions.

20. Shakespeare. Not the man so much because we don’t really know that much about him. Bit I’m fascinated by the plays themselves, what they mean, the characters, the relationships, the words Shakespeare used, the intricate design of the plots.

21. Alternate societies and worlds. (Going back to #1) How a world works, what the rules are, what’s different from our society, how one constructs a Narnia or Lilliput or Middle Earth.

22. Aphorisms. How they contain meaning, how they become cliches, how to restate old cliches and give them new meaning.

23. Sports, particularly baseball but other sports too, used as a metaphor for life.

24. Prodigals and how they return home. What makes them come back? How does a person repent?

25. Medieval and Renaissance British history. This interest could be extended to Europe as a whole, but mostly I’m an Anglophile.

26. King Arthur. Knights. Chivalry.

27. Byzantium. Constantinople. Eastern Orthodox Christianity.

28. Autumn is much more interesting than any other season.

29. Race and racial tension. Not so much white people versus black people, but what causes racial divides in the first place. What makes us decide that some people who look a certain way or have a certain ethnic heritage are so different as to be non-human? How do we reconcile ethnic and racial groups who despise one another? How can we see our own prejudices?

30. Matchmaking. How a couple comes together and how they stay together. Not so much romance, but rather the rules and mechanics of how two people are bound together in marriage. How does this cultural community do wedding? Courtship. Arranged marriage. Polygamy. Monogamy.

31. Behind the scenes at any large organization or business or collective. How did the business get started? How does it work? What are they doing back there where we can’t see? Nonfiction books such as Soul of a New Machine by Tracy Kidder or even The Way Things Work by David Macaulay. Fiction books like Hotel by Arthur Hailey or
Runaway Jury by John Grisham.

32. Communication. How babies and young children learn to talk and communicate. Helen Keller and other children with disabilities that interfere with their ability to communicate. How to overcome those disabilities.

33. Twins and triplets. I used to read a very old series of books from my library when I was a beginning reader about twins from different countries: The Dutch Twins, The French Twins, the Chinese Twins, etc.

34. Utopian communities. Dystopian cultures. How this works. What’s wrong in the dystopian community, and how do the characters in the book know it’s wrong if it’s all they’ve ever known?

35. Inventors and inventions. How do they think of such things as bicycles and butterfly bandages?

36. Obsessions and obsessive people. OCD. Monk.

37. Dreams and sleep. What really happens to us when we sleep? How is sleep different from losing consciousness or passing out? Why do we dream? What do dreams really mean?

38. Homemaking. How homemaking can be artistic and a service to those who live in the home. The Hidden Art of Homemaking by Edith Schaeffer.

39. Plagues. Holocausts. The end of the world. How will it end? With a bang or a whimper?

40. Teddy Roosevelt. Not Franklin, just Teddy.

41. Genealogy. Family history, especially my family history, but others, too, if they have stories to tell.

42. Winston Churchill.

43. Historical mysteries. What ever happened to Ambrose Bierce? Why did Agatha Christie disappear for a week while half of England searched for her? Who was Jack the Ripper?

44. People who do weird, uninhibited things like dance in the supermarket or paint their house dark purple with yellow flowers. I want to paint my front door red, and I want fire engine red counter tops in my kitchen.

45. C.S. Lewis.

46. Gender roles. How are men and women different? How are they the same?

47. The time period between World War I and World War II.

48. Secrets and hidden meanings. Puzzles. Word games. Codes and ciphers.

49. Adoption. Adoption across racial and ethnic lines. Cross-cultural adoption.

50. Artifacts from the 1930’s. Ball canning jars. Cigar boxes. Dial telephones. Old radios.

51. Word origins. Languages. Dead languages and how they died out.

52. Lists and list making.

I’m probably forgetting something that interests me very much, but these are some of my own obsessions. What are yours?

Z-Baby’s Similes

Chrysler Building, New York City
My baby is eight years old, and I think she may become a poet, even though her reading abilities have yet to catch up with her intellectual abilities.

Her most recent similes include:

“When I get through brushing my hair, it’s gonna shine like the top of the Chrysler Building!”

“My feet stink like a cow that just manured!”

“I’m as tired as a baby horse!”

Many-Colored Question

I’m almost afraid to ask this question for fear of being attacked, but I was told not too long ago that I’m “bold”. I didn’t know I was bold, but I like the idea. So I’ll ask the question.

Is “colored” a bad word? As in, “a colored lady” or a “colored man”? I know that it’s not the term of choice; I think that Africans and African Americans like to be called “black” nowadays. I find it it hard to keep up with the politically correct terms for various groups of people. However, I’m asking because an elderly man I know got into major trouble at the nursing home because he was calling one of the nurses “that colored lady.” This man is seventy-six years old, probably a bit racist, but in this particular case I don’t think he was trying to be rude. He grew up calling black people “colored” and truly didn’t mean to offend. He got reported, and the director of the nursing home came to speak to him and tell him that under no circumstances was he to call anyone “colored”. The entire incident seems like an over-reaction to me. Why couldn’t the nurse just ask him to call her by her name?

Hence, my question. Is colored a bad word? How about “people of color”? What about NAACP?

How Does Something Like This Happen?

I’m writing this post two days before Christmas, but I’m saving it until after Christmas because it’s going to sound grinch-y. And picky. But I’m writing it anyway.

Isn’t Hyperion Books a major publisher? Don’t they have editors and staff and people who read their books before they are published to make sure there aren’t any grammatical errors or spelling errors?

I just read one of the books that was nominated for the Cybil Middle Grade Fiction award. This book was a hardcover copy of the book from the library, not an advance reading copy or a review copy. Near the end of the book I read the following: [Character in book] pushed for a marker on the sight of [historical character’s] house..

Yes, “sight.” It’s not a misprint or a typo. I make plenty of those and have no room to talk about other people’s. But where was the editor when this blatant error made it into print?

I know it’s obsessive/compulsive, but the mistake rather spoiled the book for me.

American Bee by James Maguire

Subtitles: The National Spelling Bee and the Culture of Word Nerds, The lives of five top spellers as they compete for glory and fame.

First we watched the movie Akeela and the Bee. Immediately, Brown Bear Daughter, who collects enthusiasms as if they were candy, told me that she wants to be in the Scripps National Spelling Bee. Actually, she wants to win the National Spelling Bee. Then, I saw this book at the library and thought I’d read it to find out what’s involved in spelling bee competition. I had visions of “stage moms” pushing their over-achieving children to memorize the dictionary and chidren who ended up neurotic by age fifteen.

If those horror scenarios are true, Mr. Maguire didn’t see them as he spent about a year researching spelling bees in general and interviewing some of the top young adult spellers in the United States. These are the kids who get to be on TV (ESPN) once a year as they compete in the Scripps National Spelling Bee in Washington, D.C. in late May, the week of Memorial Day. The children who compete at the national level come across in the book as somewhat obsessed with words and spelling bees and very competitive, but as Mr. Maguire reiterates in the book, the dedication and hard work required to reach the upper echelons of spelling competition must come from within the child himself. No parent or teacher could manufacture or coerce that kind of discipline and intensity in a middle school aged young person.

American Bee was published in 2006, and Mr. Maguire chose five spellers who were favored to win the 2005 National Spelling Bee and followed their individual paths to the nationals. Unfortunately (SPOILER) he didn’t happen to choose the child who actually won the 2005 bee as one of his five interview-ees. On the other hand, I looked, and one of the spellers he profiled in his book came back and won the National Spelling Bee in 2006 after the book was published. So maybe Mr. Maguire wasn’t such a bad picker after all.

Other chapters in the book give profiles of past spelling bee champions and what happened to them after their spelling days were over, information about the history of spelling and spelling bees, and a general history of English language spelling with an emphasis on why it’s so hard to spell many English words. Mostly, it’s because English is such a scavenger language and no one’s in charge of the development of the language. Did you know that France and Spain each have a government agancy that makes decisions about what words are allowed into the language and how those words will be used and spelled? Americans would never stand for such a bureaucracy . (By the way, I had a lot of trouble spelling that last word; most of the spellers in this book could have reeled it off without breaking a sweat.)

If you’re interested in words or spelling or kids and competition, American Bee is a fine introduction to a particularly engaging subculture. I’ll let you know if Brown Bear Daughter maintains her new-found passion for spelling long enough to actually compete. It’s not looking too promising; she’s already lost the spelling bee booklet she needs to begin her preparations.

Words, Words, Words

Start with a meme; go out with a bang. I borrowed the word meme from Stefanie at So Many Books, a long time ago. I asked a couple of the urchins to give me their word choices, too.

Words that always look misspelled to me:
obscene, obsession, skiing, Qatar, judgment, acquiesce, grieve, posttest

Brown Bear Daughter, age 11: precipitate (It looks as if it has too many i’s.)
Karate Kid, age 9: theirs

Words I enjoy saying:
misanthropic, anthropomorphic, surreptitious, melancholy, parmesan, lackadaisical

BBD: tortilla
KK: pervert

Words I enjoy hearing:
thank you, I love you, yes m’am.

BBD: Daddy’s home!
KK: awesome

Abbreviations I dislike:
lbs. (lubs?), ms. (miz?)

BBD: oz., m, mm
KK: lb., mrs.

Proper nouns I enjoy:
Dime Box, Texas
Bilbo Baggins
Lake Wobegon
General Shalishkavili
Ramona Quimby

BBD: Butterfinger
KK: Milky Way

Words I associate with happiness:
children, chocolate, celebration, flowers, autumn

BBD: flute, lyrical, recital, christmas
KK: win, guitar

Words I always misspell:
obcession, judgement, innoculate, preemptory.

BBD: suprise, imeadiately
KK: their, there, they’re

Words I enjoy spelling correctly, every time:
miscellaneous, embarrass, Philippians, Deuteronomy, congratulations

BBD: iridescent, Wednesday, February, staphylococci
KK: prestidigitation

Words that, though I love their meaning, I’m too embarrassed to say out loud:
Any big long words that I’m afraid people will think pretentious.

Words I can never remember the meaning of no matter how many times I look them up:
biennial, mauve, cerulean

Words that sound like what they mean:
lugubrious, grotesque, bilious, loathe, wheeze, brusque

BBD: chocolate
KK: karate

Words that sound like something other than what they mean:
pulchritude, corporeal, minuend, benignant, cryogenics

What are some of your favorite words? Your least favorite?

The Professor and the Madman by Simon Winchester

Subtitled “A Tale of Murder, Insanity, and the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary,” this book has something for everyone. For bibliophiles and verbivores, there are all the dictionary details. Did you know that it took seventy years to produce the first edition of the OED? Or that there are 414,825 words defined in the OED? Did you know that the team of lexicographers who produced the dictionary included many unpaid volunteers who read and copied out quotations from a myriad of sources? Did you know that they mislaid one word, only one, bondsmaid? It was found long after the volume in which it would have been included was published, and it was later included in a supplement to the dictionary which came out in 1933.

I can tell, though, that some of you are more interested in the murder and insanity. Well, one of those lowly, unpaid volunteers, one who made himself indispensible to the dictionary project, was an American living in Britain. Unknown at first to the editor of the dictionary and his team of lexicographers, this American, a medical doctor, who sent in thousands of useful citations that were used in the final dictionary, was also a resident of England’s second most famous mental hospital, Broadmoor Asylum for the Criminally Insane. It was an interesting collaboration, to say the least.

So if your interests extend to crime, murder, paranoia, mayhem, the development of the English language, or lexicography, you’ll find something of interest in this book. I noticed the other day that Ms. Mental Multivitamin has a copy of this book in her library.
I borrowed mine from the public library.

By the way, did you know that Shakespeare didn’t have a dictionary?

Whenever he came to use an unusual word, or to set a word in what seemed an unusual context—and his plays are extraordinarily rich with examples—he had almost no way of checking the propriety of what he was about to do. . . . Shakespeare was not even able to perform a function that we consider today as perfectly normal and ordinary a function as reading itself. He could not as the saying goes, “look something up.” . . . Indeed, the very phrase did not exist.

Maybe that’s why Shakespeare was so inventive with words and phrases, no dictionaries to hem him in and tell him what he couldn’t do.

Visit Semicolon’s Amazon Store for more great book recommendations.

To This Great Stage of Fools: Born May 3rd

Niccolo Machiavelli, b.1469, d.1527. In his most famous work, The Prince, he set down rules for a science of political power –how to gain power and how to stay in power no matter what means were necessary. Hence the word machiavellian meaning “being or acting in accordance with the principles of government analyzed in Machiavelli’s The Prince, in which political expediency is placed above morality and the use of craft and deceit to maintain the authority and carry out the policies of a ruler is described or more generally, characterized by subtle or unscrupulous cunning, deception, expediency, or dishonesty.”

What other adjectives can you think of that are derived from an author’s name? (Eponyms: “words derived from the name of a real, fictional, mythical or spurious character or person.”) I’m asking only for adjectival eponyms that derive from authors’ names.

Shakespearean, as in Shakespearean sonnet, or Petrarchan, named after the Italian who did Petrarchan sonnets instead, or even Spenserian sonnets, the third type after Edmund Spenser.

Freudian, as in a freudian slip.

Orwellian. “Of, relating to, or evocative of the works of George Orwell, especially the satirical novel 1984, which depicts a futuristic totalitarian state.” Are we living in an Orwellian age?

Darwinian, the Darwinian theory of evolution.

Socratic. Have you ever engaged in a Socratic dialog?

Dickensian. Can you think of any Dickensian characters outside of Dickens’ novels?

Kafkaesque. How about Kafkaesque moments?

If you can’t think of any more eponym that come from authors’ names, you can always make up your own:

Semicolonic: Of or pertaining to a pause for thought between two parts of related thoughts or ideas. Example: The semicolonic silence in the room was only momentary as Engineer Husband completed the theory that his erudite helpmeet had begun to elucidate.

Wasn’t that fun?

Shakespeare’s Pivotal Year and Age

I recently read A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare: 1599 by James Shapiro. For this nonfiction book Shapiro chose the year 1599 because, he says, it was a pivotal year in Shakespeare’s career, the year in which, at age thirty-five, he “went from being an exceptionally talented writer to being one of the greatest who ever lived.” In 1599, Shakespeare completed and staged his most complex history play, Henry V, and also wrote and produced Julius Caesar and As You Like It. He also was revising Hamlet as the year came to an end, and it was probably first produced in 1600.

Shapiro deals up front with the many “probabilities” in writing about Shakespeare in the preface to his book:

When writing about an age that predated newspapers and photographic evidence, plausibility, not certitude, is as close as one can come to what happened. Rather than awkwardly littering the pages that follow with one hedge after another–“perhaps,” “maybe,” “it’s most likely,” “probably,” or the most desperate of them all, “surely”–I’d like to offer one global qualification here. This is necessarily my reconstruction of what happened to Shakespeare in the course of this year, and when I do qualify a claim, it signals that the evidence is inconclusive or the argument highly speculative.

Did you know that The Chamberlain’s Men, Shakespeare’s company, tore down their former landlord’s theater in December 1598 and used the materials to build the Globe Theater? They spent a great deal of time afterward in court defending their actions against a lawsuit brought by that landlord, Giles Allen.

Did you know that 1599 was the year of the Fall of Robert Devereaux, Earl of Essex, Queen Elizabeth’s favorite, whom she sent to Ireland to quell a rebellion? Essex failed and returned to England without the queen’s permission, incurring her wrath. He later led an unsuccessful rebellion of his own, and the first hint of Essex’s overweening pride is the historical background against which Shakespeare wrote Julius Caesar, a story of rebellion, ambition, and pride going before a fall.

Did you know that the last part of The Hollow Men by T.S. Eliot echoes Brutus in Julius Caesar?

Between the acting of a dreadful thing
And the first motion, all the interim is
Like a phantasma, or a hideous dream:
The genius and the mortal instruments
Are then in council; and the state of man,
Like to a little kingdom, suffers then
The nature of an insurrection.

(I imagine that this is a revelation to no one else, but I’m a little slow.)

Did you know that Shakespeare was “probably” influenced by Montaigne’s essays and others that were just beginning to be written and published in the late 1500’s to write Hamlet’s soliloquies?

Have you ever heard of hendiadys? “Hendiadys literally means ‘one by means of two.’ a single idea conveyed through a pairing of nouns linked by ‘and.'” Some examples from Hamlet:

“Angels and ministers of grace defend us!”
“the book and volume of my brain”
“a fantasy and trick of fame”
“the abstract and brief chronicles of the the time”

There are sixty-six hendiadys in Hamlet, more than in any other of Shakespeare’s plays. Almost no other English writer uses hendiadys extensively. I tried to do it in the title to this post, but it’s not as easy to do well as it might sound. You have to pick out near-synonyms that both complement and qualify one another.

Have you ever compared Shakespeare’s Hamlet to Don Quixote? Both were mad, or feigned madness. Both had a friend, a sort of a straight man, who didn’t understand their dilemma. Both were caught between the age of chivalry and the renaissance. Both saw ghosts and phantoms. Both were unable to relate to a real woman. Don Quixote created his own ideal lady; Hamlet goaded his Ophelia into insanity and death. Shakespeare collaborated on a play late in his career, around 1612, called Cardenio that was taken from a story in Don Quixote. At the time of the writing of Hamlet, Don Quixote had not yet been translated into English. Are the similarities in the two characters coincidental or a reflection of the times? Of course, Don Quixote is a much more comic and more hopeful character, but both he and Hamlet die in the end.

I learned all these things and chased down several of these rabbit trails while reading A Year in the Life of WIlliam Shakespeare: 1599. Highly recommended for literary history buffs and Shakespeare fans.

Out of the Mouths of Babes

Z-baby: Daddy, you need to be more constricable.

Engineer Dad: What’s that?

Z-baby: Constricable means kinda like an artist.

Engineer Dad: So I’m somewhat artistic already, but I need to be more.

Z-Baby: Yes, more constricable.

Several hours later:
Z-baby: God can make the world out of nothing so he’s an artist.

Me: So does that mean God is constricable?

Z-baby: Yes, ’cause He’s an artist.

You heard it here first, guys. One of God’s attributes is that He’s constricable.