Archive | July 2008

Mere Comments on the News

S.M. Hutchens on education: Maieusis, the work of midwives, involves knowledge and opinion about the process and what its ends are. Those who practice it must understand what is normal and desirable, know error or anomaly, and take steps to correct it with as much force as is required to accomplish the right end. The teacher’s task, to be sure, is essentially that of a guide and encourager, but to do this he must know the path to be taken, and equally, what is not the path, and is to be discouraged. His knowledge of his subject is not to be imparted or simply transferred as much as put forward for the advantage of the learner–who is to make of it what he can, and may be examined by the master on that making, the examination, ideally, being for the master’s learning as well as the student’s.

Anthony Esolen on conservatism and so-called homosexual marriage: When a high court overthrows over two millennia of western tradition, all English common law, and the express will of the people, to engage in an unheard of experiment touching upon the most intimate matters of human society — marriage and the family — and when the people supinely put up with it, at best hoping to tweak the decision or overturn it in some vainly hoped-for election, then it is not the case that civic liberty will soon be lost. It already has been lost. Quit looking at the ephemeral! Your forefathers rebelled over a few high-handed taxes without parliamentary representation. They and their descendants for a hundred and fifty years would have tarred and feathered the silly members of that court, denouncing them as fools and tyrants, and putting them back in their place.

Celebration Reminder

cooltext92322612

Please note that the third installment in the Semicolon Author Celebration Series takes place on Thursday, July 17th, as we celebrate the birthday of musician and poet Isaac Watts. If you have something, anything, to say about Mr. Watts, please write it up and bring your link to the party on the 17th.

Here’s a little preview from a past post.

Would that be a retro-preview?

The Sunday Salon: Ruminating and Rambling

The Sunday Salon.com

I just joined Sunday Salon this week, and I’m planning to use it as an opportunity to think about what I’ve been reading and watching and studying for the week, maybe figuring how my “media intake” has influenced my thoughts and decisions and what I might want to do in response to what God is teaching me.

I watched a couple of movies this week: Becoming Jane, the fictional story of author Jane Austen’s doomed courtship with an entangled and ultimately unavailable young man, and Finding Neverland, the somewhat fictionalized story of author James Barrie’s doomed and irresponsible courtship of a widow and mother of four boys. I’ve seen the second movie before, and I reviewed it here. I was not quite as disturbed by Finding Neverland this second time as I was the first; I had more hope that J.M. Barrie would do the right thing and grow up for the sake of his young friends. There is a theme that runs through both movies of taking responsibility, self-sacrifice, and romantic dreams being subordinated to duty. Those are not easy lessons to make palatable on film in this day and age of self-actualization, irresponsibility, and romantic delusion. So I applaud both movies for the attempt.

I’ve also finished Jayber Crow by Wendell Berry, and I find that I want think about that book a bit more before I write much about it. I started reading The Deadliest Monster: An Introduction to Worldviews by J.F. Baldwin, an examination of currently popular worldviews and a comparison of those philosophies to the Christian view of life. Baldwin uses Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein monster and R.L. Stevenson’s Mr. Hyde as icons of two opposing worldviews: Mr. Hyde represents the Christian idea of original (innnate) sin and the necessity of God’s grace for salvation, and Frankenstein’s monster typifies the belief that men are only monsters because of their environment and influences and can perfect (save) themselves by their own efforts and good works.

Baldwin reminded me that none of us is truly able to perfect or redeem ourselves, that our own hearts are deceptive, and that we are all sinners in need of the mercy of God. And I have need of such reminders since I ruefully saw myself in these words from the book:

“As we grow in our faith, the little light bulb comes on that says, ‘Hey, Christ really meant it when he called himself the Way, the Truth, and the Life. Christianity really is true, and the rest of the world really is deceived!’ And then, unfortunately, a prideful voice whispers, ‘Aren’t I perceptive to see that Christianity is true and that every other worldview is bankrupt? I am one smart monkey.’ If we listen to this whisper, we allow ourselves to be deceived into thinking that we somehow rescued ourselves by being clever enough to see the truth.”

AH, yes, clever me, saved by grace and smart enough to do God a favor by recognizing His favor! If only that miserable tax collector were like me!

God, forgive us our pride and help us to see ourselves for the monsters we are apart from Him.

Exit Lines

American Book Review picks their 100 Best Last Lines from novels.

I’ve posted here before about first lines, but not about closing lines. My favorites from the ABR list:

5. But I reckon I got to light out for the Territory ahead of the rest, because Aunt Sally she’s going to adopt me and sivilize me and I can’t stand it. I been there before. –Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1885)

8. It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known. –Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities (1859)

57. “All that is very well,” answered Candide, “but let us cultivate our garden.”
–Voltaire, Candide (1759; trans. Robert M. Adams)

77. Tomorrow, I’ll think of some way to get him back. After all, tomorrow is another day. –Margaret Mitchell, Gone with the Wind (1936)

There were others that read pretty well, but I hadn’t read the books they came from and so couldn’t be sure that they meant what I thought they meant.

Can you guess which books end with each of these famous lines?

1. He drew a deep breath. “Well, I’m back,” he said.

2. And there they died upon a Good Friday for God’s sake.

3. So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.

4. Now at last they were beginning Chapter One of the Great Story, which no one on earth has read; which goes on forever; in which every chapter is better than the one before.

5. He knelt by the bed and bent over her, draining their last moment to its lees; and in the silence there passed between them the word which made all clear.

The end. At last. An essay on last lines from The Telegraph.

Don’t Talk To Me About the War by David A. Adler

Thirteen year old Tommy Duncan isn’t interested in the news from Europe, news of war. It’s May, 1940, and it just might be the year the Brooklyn Dodgers win the series. And that’s the kind of news that interests Tommy. His friend, Beth, however, talks about the war in Europe all the time, and Tommy doesn’t understand half of what she’s talking about. But he still likes her a lot, even if she does try to get him to read the war news with her when they meet at Goldman’s Coffee Shop to walk to school together.

Tommy and his friends are seventh graders, but they act and feel younger. I think that’s because the story is set in 1940, before the U.S. entered World War II. Even though the kids in the story seem younger than thirteen in some ways, the story feels right, maybe because children didn’t take on a psuedo-sophistication as young as kids do now. They did take on responsibility, however. Tommy’s friend, Beth, does all the cooking and shopping for her family because her mother is dead. And Tommy takes more and more responsibility as the story progresses because his mother is dealing with a mysterious illness that makes her more and more dependent on Tommy and his dad.

The voices of the kids, especially Tommy the narrator, work well and help to set the story in another era. But today’s thirteen year olds and older may become impatient with Tommy and his straightforward way of thinking and talking and behaving. There’s not a lot of nuance or worldly sophistication here. I found it refreshing.

Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus by Mary Shelley

Prometheus, for those of us who have forgotten our Greek mythology, was a “Titan known for his wily intelligence, who stole fire from Zeus and gave it to mortals for their use. He was then punished for his crime by Zeus.”

In Mary Shelley’s novel, Victor Frankenstein steals, not fire, but the secret of life from no one, from the dark recesses of natural science; God does not appear in Shelley’s story. Shelley’s Prometheus/Frankenstein is a misguided soul who unleashes upon the world a monster so horrible that he has no name. At first, the monster provokes some sympathy; he is shunned by all who see him because of his hideous physical appearance. But the monster, or demon as Frankenstein calls him, soon forfeits all our pity by becoming a murderer and a wholly vindictive, malevolent creature.

Then, as the story progresses, Frankenstein himself becomes a monster, full of revenge and determined to destroy his creation. The lines between good and evil, between creature and creator are blurred. Mary Shelley may have intended the novel as a critique of the Industrial Revolution, a la Rousseau, but in the end there is not much basis to choose between Frankenstein and his monster. Frankenstein starts out with good intentions. The monster supposedly starts out as an innocent, loving, but horrifyingly ugly, creature. Both are warped by events and changed into ghastly fiends.

For Mary Shelley, the creator bears responsibility for sin and evil in his creature. Yet, the novel never gives an alternative. Frankenstein wishes many times that he had never created his monster, but he never envisions the possibility of having created a different kind of creature, one that is incapable of evil choices, probably realizing that such a creature would not be human-like but rather a mere robot. Nor does Frankenstein try to redeem his creation, turn it to good, and never does he even consider forgiveness as a response to the monster’s evil actions. Frankenstein writhes and struggles in his own awful responsibility, and he dreams of revenge. In the end, Victor Frankenstein is no victor at all; even his revenge is thwarted and unfulfilled.

Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein at a very young age. She was only 21 years old when it was published anonymously in London in 1818. This first edition of the book had an unsigned preface written by Mary’s lover/then husband, the poet Percy Shelley. Perhaps Mary Shelley had some regrets of her own that were being worked out in written form. She ran away with the married Shelley when she was only sixteen and then married him after his first wife committed suicide. After Mr. Shelley’s death in a boating accident in 1822, Mary Shelley wrote these words to a friend: “Well here is my story – the last story I shall have to tell – all that might have been bright in my life is now despoiled – I shall live to improve myself, to take care of my child, & render myself worthy to join him. Soon my weary pilgrimage will begin – I rest now – but soon I must leave Italy.”

She sounds a lot like her creation, Victor Frankenstein, who entered into study and scientific experimentation with great hopes, but found his life “despoiled” and a “weary pilgrimage.”

Poetry and Fine Art Friday

“A poem is so brief. It’s not a practical thing like buying a loaf of bread. A poem is like a seed that can grow and enlarge in your mind. Poetry has become such an integral part of culture around the world. It’s one of the few things that is not pragmatic, perhaps, that speaks to the intuition and imagination, and it’s not linear. It takes a leap of understanding. It gives us a different dimension to our believing and our understanding.”
Luci Shaw in an interview with Washington Times reporter Jen Waters

I don’t know if this poem “takes a leap of understanding.” Brown Bear Daughter, age thirteen, wrote this poem after a trip to the beach.

Beach by M. Early

Toes in the sand

Staring up

Staring down

Sinking slowly

Sinking down

Looking over

Blue waves are white,

On fire by the moonlight

It’s an iridescent, glowing peace.

And this Edvard Munsch painting may not be exactly what Brown Bear was writing about, but it’s close . . . and beautiful.

Summer Night at the Beach




Summer Night at the Beach

Art Print

Munch, Edvard


Buy at AllPosters.com

Happy Birthday to John Calvin

On this date in 1509, John Calvin, or Jean Chauvin, was born in Noyon, Picardie, France. His father was a lawyer who sent young John to the University of Paris at the age of fourteen to study theology. He later changed his area of study to law. Sometime during his university studies, Calvin was exposed to Protestant ideas, and he became a proponent of those ideas to the point that he was forced to flee France along with his mentor, Nicholas Cop, Rector at the University of Paris. He went to Basel, then to Geneva, then to Strasburg, and back to Geneva. He pastored, helped govern, and wrote theology in these places, especially in Geneva, until his death in 1564.

Calvin said:

There is not one little blade of grass, there is no color in this world that is not intended to make men rejoice.

The fruit of the womb is not born by chance, but is to be reckoned among the precious gifts of God.

Without knowledge of self there is no knowledge of God.
Our wisdom, in so far as it ought to be deemed true and solid Wisdom, consists almost entirely of two parts: the knowledge of God and of ourselves. But as these are connected together by many ties, it is not easy to determine which of the two precedes and gives birth to the other.

We must see to it that the pulling down of error is followed by the building up of faith.

In the darkness of our miseries, the grace of God shines more brightly.

God . . . makes us rich with the river of his grace . . . so that those things which men call fortuitous events, are so many proofs of divine providence, and more especially of fatherly compassion, furnishing ground of joy to the righteous.

Interesting facts about Calvin (from Wikipedia and other sources):

Calvin took only one meal a day for a decade, but on the advice of his physician, he ate an egg and drank a glass of wine at noon.

Calvin, knowing the benefits of business, was instrumental in founding and developing the silk industry in Geneva.

At the age of twenty-six, Calvin published the first edition of his Institutes of the Christian Religion .

Calvin’s cousin, Pierre Robert, was a translator of the Bible into the French language.

For kids:

This fictionalized biography by Joyce McPherson stays close to the facts of Calvin’s life while adding in some dialogue to make the story come alive. The book includes many of the most important people in Calvin’s life, including Nicholas Cop, Mathurius Cordier, Pierre Viret, William Farel, and Martin Bucer.

 

 

Series I Want to Watch

HBO’s version of David McCullough’s biography of John Adams, recommended here.

Slings and Arrows, recommended by Mental Multivitamin.

Cranford and North and South, both series based on books by Mrs. Gaskell.

Brideshead Revisited based on the novel by Evelyn Waugh. I already have the first two episodes of this mini-series, via Blockbuster Online, and I’m just waiting for Eldest Daughter to find time to watch with me.

The new season, fourth I think, of House.

Those ought to take me through the end of the year 2010 at the rate I watch movies.

Song for a Dark Queen by Rosemary Sutcliff

Dark Ages . . . Dark Queen . . . Dark History.

There really is veil, or a sort of a blank space in my mind, covering the time between the end of the New Testament, around 100 AD, and the beginning of the Middle Ages, which will always begin in my mind at 1066 AD when The Norman invaders defeated the Saxons in England at the Battle of Hastings.

What happened between those two dates? The Romans sort of ebbed and flowed in response to repeated barbarian invasions and challenges. The Eastern Roman Empire flourished with its center at Constantinople. And in 60 or 61 AD, actually before my cut-off date but still under my historical radar, Boudica, queen of the Iceni tribe of East Anglia, led a group of British tribes in a rebellion against the Romans. Although the rebellion was ultimately unsuccessful, Boudica is still remembered, especially in Britain, and she has become a symbol of courage and female spirit and tenacity. Tennyson wrote a poem called Boadicea (a variant spelling), and Cowper also wrote a poem about the Dark Queen. And a statue of Boudica, commissioned by Victoria’s Prince Albert, stands near Westminster Pier in London.

Also Rosemary Sutcliff, prolific author of historical fiction, especially historical fiction set in ancient Britain, wrote this book, a fictional treatment of Boudica’s life and times. It would be appropriate for teens and young adults who were studying this time period, but it’s a little too bloody and violent for younger children, in my opinion. Unfortunately, the blood and guts are true to actual events since the Romans really did take Boudica’s kingdom, beat her and rape her daughters, after the death of her husband who left the kingdom in his will to Boudica and to the Roman Emperor. The Romans didn’t believe in women rulers, so they sort of ignored the part about Boudica’s inheriting jointly. The Britons requited the Roman rape and pillage with “slaughter by gibbet, fire, or cross,” destroying three Roman cities, including Londinium (London), and seventy or eighty thousand people before the Britons were defeated by the superiorly trained and disciplined Roman troops.

Good book, sad story. Song for a Dark Queen is out of print, by the way. There seems to be a a play based on the novel by Rosemary Sutcliff available at Amazon, but no book.

E. Bird’s review of Song for a Dark Queen at Amazon.