Archive | October 2006

KidLit Awards Grow out of Bloggers’ Frustration

CHICAGO, Illinois – Like all revolutions, this one started small, with a single post on a blog devoted to children’s literature. The Newbery Medals seemed too elitist and the Quills, well, not enough so.
Was there a middle ground, an annual award that would recognize both a book’s merits and popularity?
The answer: invent one! Within hours, this meme had circulated among some of the biggest bloggers in the burgeoning kidlitosphere, the cozy corner of the Web where children’s books are given the same regard as their grown-up counterparts.
Within days, the new awards had a name and a website: The Cybils, a loose acronym for Children’s and YA Bloggers’ Literary Awards. Nominations quickly opened in eight categories, from picture books up to Young Adult fiction and even graphic novels.
In keeping with the democratic and unpredictable nature of the blogosphere, anybody can nominate a book, so long as it was published in 2006 in English. Yep, anybody: teens can log their choices, authors can nominate themselves, random Googlers can leave word too.
Nominations close Nov. 20. Then comes the literary part. Panels comprised of bloggers with expertise in their category will cull the lists down to five finalists (to be announced Jan. 1). After that, judges step in to pick the winners.
Who are these smarty-pants panelists and judges? Some have impressive bona fides, including, yes, a Newbery judge. Others are your garden-variety librarians, teachers, homeschoolers, authors and illustrators, parents and the kidlit-obsessed.
“Think of it as Wal-Mart meets Nordstrom over kids’ books,” said Anne Boles Levy, a freelance writer who blogs at Book Buds Kidlit Reviews. “Bedtime will never be the same.”

Media Contacts:
Anne Boles Levy, anne@bookbuds.net
Kelly Herold, kidslitinfo@gmail.com

Hey, I get to be one of those “smarty-pants panelists and judges.” I’m one of the judges for the Middle Grade Fiction category, and I’m looking forward to reading the nominated books and picking the best. You are needed to nominate books in each of the categories, and some bloggers are still needed to serve on the nominating and judging committees for some categories. Go over and check it out.

World Geography Week 10: China

Music:
Hector Berlioz—Te Deum

Mission Study:
1. Bold Bearers of His Name: Ji-Wang
2. Window on the World: China
3. WotW: Dai Lu
4. WotW: Hui
5. WotW: Mongolia

Poetry:
Through Our Eyes—Lee Bennett Hopkins

Science: Solids, Liquids, and Gases

Nonfiction Read Alouds:
The Pageant of Chinese History—Seeger

Fiction Read Alouds:
Little Pear—Lattimore
Granny Han’s Breakfast–Groves
Tales of a Chinese Grandmother–Carpenter

Picture Books:
Take a Trip to China–Mason
My Book About Hudson Taylor
The Story about Ping—Flack
Lon Po Po—A Red Riding Hood Story from China
Count Your Way Through China—Haskins
When Panda Came to Our House—Jensen
The Dragon Prince: A Chinese Beauty and the Beast Tale–Yep

Elementary Readers:
House of Sixty Fathers—DeJong
Young Fu of the Upper Yangtze
God’s Adventurer: Hudson Taylor—Thompson
Eric Liddell–Swift
Three Little Chinese Girls—Lattimore. I’m reading this story of the playtime adventures of three Chinese sisters with Bee Girl (second grade). Such fun!
Flight of the Fugitives: Gladys Aylward–Jackson

Can anyone suggest any movies set in China that are appropriate for children and families?

The Book Thief by Marcus Zusak

This was an odd book, so odd that I probably wouldn’t have managed to get very far into it if it hadn’t been recommended so highly by so many people. I’m a straightforward, A-Z, kind of gal. Give me a story that starts out “Once upon a time” and ends with “happily ever after.” Or not happily. Tragedy is OK, too. But I like it straight and plain-spoken, or maybe poetic, but not a strange, episodic story narrated by the Grim Reaper himself.

Except I did like The Book Thief, so I’m confused. The book starts out with this comforting announcement:

* * * HERE IS A SMALL FACT * * *
You are going to die.

It ends with Death Himself beng confused and “haunted by humans.”

So, make what you will of that, and decide whether or not you want to read an odd book about Death and the Holocaust and World War II and bombs and Germany with lots of cursing, mostly in German, and lots of the aforementioned death, mostly of everybody in the book. It sounds depressing, but it’s not really. It is gritty and the tiniest bit hopeful, but not too. I can’t decide if kids will like it or not. I don’t think my kids would care for it. But some might. Or this might be the sort of book that will win lots of awards because it’s written in a different, literary sort of way and it’s about a Serious Subject, but it’s mostly loved by librarians and teachers. I can see high school teachers assigning this book in literature classes or history classes.

If I sound ambivalent, it’s because I am. Help? Someone else tell me now that I’ve read it why it was that you liked it so much.

Visit Semicolon’s Amazon Store for more great book recommendations.

To This Great Stage of Fools: Born October 21st

Samuel Taylor Coleridge, b. 1772

Sir, I admit your general rule,
That every poet is a fool,
But you yourself may serve to show it,
That every fool is not a poet.




Ursula K. LeGuin b. 1929. Does this brief piece by LeGuin on “What Makes a Story?” make sense to you? Ms. LeGuin has written some fine fantasy, including the Earthsea novels.

Ann Cameron, b. 1943. Author of easy-to-read chapter books for children. I like the Julian books very much, especially the story in which Julian and his little brother, Huey, eat their father’s special lemon pudding, a pudding that tastes “like a whole raft of lemons, like a night on the sea.” When Father wakes up from his nap to find the pudding gone and Julian and Huey hiding under the bed, he hauls them out and makes the punishment fit the crime.

Janet Ahlberg, b. 1944.

Also on this date in 1879, Thomas A. Edison first demonstrated his incandescent lamp. And it’s the birthday of Alfred Nobel, inventor of dynamite, who left his fortune to endow the Noble Prizes.

Winter Birds by Jamie Langston Turner

I had never heard of Jamie Langston Turner until Bethany House sent me her newest novel, Winter Birds, to review. I am not on Ms. Turner’s payroll nor is Bethany House paying me. So, I can say without guile or reservations, Winter Birds is a fine book. The characters are interesting and multi-faceted. The story is about an old woman who’s preparing herself for death, so there aren’t many exciting plot developments. When exciting things do happen —an attempted kidnapping, murder, death of a child— the developments either take place “off stage” or they’re described in an understated sort of way that makes it clear that these are abnormal parts of an otherwise ordinary life and that the real excitement and interest is in what these and other occurences do to the characters involved.

I didn’t care much for the narrator of the novel at first. I don’t think I was supposed to like her. “A difficult old woman may be entertaining if you are not responsible for her upkeep.” Sophia Hess, the difficult old woman who writes these words, is not entertaining. Her bitterness is too apparent. She is, however, intriguing. I had to keep reading to figure out why Sophia was so bitter. What made her who she has become? Will she change? How? Will she die trapped in her loneliness and misanthropy?

My care is a responsibility that Patrick has taken upon himself willingly, though, as in most duties, with insufficient understanding of what it will entail.” Patrick and his wife, Rachel, are a childless middle-aged couple. They have given Patrick’s Aunt Sophia, age eighty, an apartment in their home and agreed to care for her until her death. Sophia thinks they are doing this good deed in return for the promise that she will leave them her money when she does die. Patrick and Rachel may have other motivations. Sophia thinks she has Patrick figured out. He talks too much. He is not as intelligent as he thinks he is. He is, according to Sophia, unknowingly racist and inconsiderate and unobservant.

Rachel is something more of a mystery to Sophia. Rachel, who has survived a terrible tragedy, is just good. Sophia keeps looking for the chinks in Rachel’s goodness, but she finds very few. As more and more people enter the lives of the three main characters, Sophia finds that she cannot just sit and wait to die. It’s not that easy, and she doesn’t really want to die. She doesn’t want to live either. She just wants to continue to get dessert every night. 🙂

Jamie Langston Turner is professor of creative writing and literature at Bob Jones University. Perhaps the negative reputation of BJU in some circles is the reason I’ve never heard of Ms. Turner. However, her books reminds me of Madeleine L’Engle, and that is high praise indeed. I plan to find her other books and read them: Some Wildflower in my Heart, No Dark Valley, and By the Light of a Thousand Stars. If those books live up to this one, I think I’ve found a new favorite author.

Oh, I almost forgot to mention that Winter Birds is chock-full of references to Shakespeare, a motif that made it lots of fun, and there’s also a recurring theme related to the birds that Sophia sees at her window birdfeeder. I’m not so interested in birds, but both the Shakespeare and the birds were nice ways of tying the story together and drawing analogies and comparisons between the characters and events in the novel and habits of the birds and the characters and thoughts of Shakespeare.

Read it. You’ll be glad you did.

Visit Semicolon’s Amazon Store for more great book recommendations.

Friday’s Center of the Blogosphere

What a great contest! I wish I could think of something really clever, but maybe you, my readers, can figure out a campaign slogan for your favorite literary or historical character.

My Boss Is a Jewish Psychiatrist! Vote for Sigmund Freud! He’ll Psychoanalyze Kinky and Grandma!
(For those of you who don’t live in Texas, both Kinky and Grandma are running for governor. And Kinky Friedman’s bumper stickers say: “My Governor is a Jewish Cowboy/ Vote for Kinky”)

Writing and Living on Appliance Group Dynamics. Maybe Anne’s dryer has delusions of grandeur and plans to run for mayor instead of continuing to serve the Writing and Living family. Even I couldn’t think of a campaign slogan for that!

There is a different kind of election going on at The Cybils award site. A couple of bloggers came up with the idea of initiating The First Annual Children’s and YA Bloggers’ Literary Awards, aka The Cybils. We’re giving awards in several categories, and nominations are open now through November 20th. Anyone can nominate any books published in 2006; bloggers and non-bloggers both are welcome. And I get to be on the judging committee for Middle Grade fiction—because I volunteered. So, if you’ve read any children’s or young adult books published this year, go over and nominate your favorites. Then, watch to see who wins.

“Really, it makes me feel rather melancholy for the state of postmodern humanity that people nowadays would tend to assume that anyone singing in a non-performance setting must be practicing for a performance later. I mean, why bother to sing if you aren’t performing?” So muses the Queen of the Beehive in her post on singing just for the fun of it. Is communal singing a lost art?

Author Lars Walker has a conspiracy theory—and a link to some potentially world-changing recordings.

The Professor and the Madman by Simon Winchester

Subtitled “A Tale of Murder, Insanity, and the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary,” this book has something for everyone. For bibliophiles and verbivores, there are all the dictionary details. Did you know that it took seventy years to produce the first edition of the OED? Or that there are 414,825 words defined in the OED? Did you know that the team of lexicographers who produced the dictionary included many unpaid volunteers who read and copied out quotations from a myriad of sources? Did you know that they mislaid one word, only one, bondsmaid? It was found long after the volume in which it would have been included was published, and it was later included in a supplement to the dictionary which came out in 1933.

I can tell, though, that some of you are more interested in the murder and insanity. Well, one of those lowly, unpaid volunteers, one who made himself indispensible to the dictionary project, was an American living in Britain. Unknown at first to the editor of the dictionary and his team of lexicographers, this American, a medical doctor, who sent in thousands of useful citations that were used in the final dictionary, was also a resident of England’s second most famous mental hospital, Broadmoor Asylum for the Criminally Insane. It was an interesting collaboration, to say the least.

So if your interests extend to crime, murder, paranoia, mayhem, the development of the English language, or lexicography, you’ll find something of interest in this book. I noticed the other day that Ms. Mental Multivitamin has a copy of this book in her library.
I borrowed mine from the public library.

By the way, did you know that Shakespeare didn’t have a dictionary?

Whenever he came to use an unusual word, or to set a word in what seemed an unusual context—and his plays are extraordinarily rich with examples—he had almost no way of checking the propriety of what he was about to do. . . . Shakespeare was not even able to perform a function that we consider today as perfectly normal and ordinary a function as reading itself. He could not as the saying goes, “look something up.” . . . Indeed, the very phrase did not exist.

Maybe that’s why Shakespeare was so inventive with words and phrases, no dictionaries to hem him in and tell him what he couldn’t do.

Visit Semicolon’s Amazon Store for more great book recommendations.

LOST: Further Instructions, or Visions from a Sweat Lodge

Here be spoilers, and polar bears, and lots of blood. SO, if you haven’t seen the latest episode of LOST and don’t want to know anything about it in advance, don’t read.

1. De live-blogged the show at Thinklings. Unfortunately, we weren’t attending the same party. He says, “Locke is mute, and Charlie can talk (and talk, and talk). Punch him, Locke!! Please! You’ve done it before! I can’t take the charades!” We were saying, “Oh, good, Locke can’t talk. And Charlie can. Please let it last for a couple of episodes at least.” But it didn’t. By the end of the episode, Locke is making heroic speeches again. He’s the macho leader guy who’s redemed his mistakes by rescuing Eko, almost single-handedly. But I would have loved to have seen him carrying Eko on his back by himself all the way back to camp. Locke turns into The Hulk! Only he doesn’t. Charlie’s right. THey ignore him until they need him for guard duty or to hold up the other side of Mr. Eko. Then, Charlie’s their best friend. And Charlie is funny. Locke isn’t.

2. “Ever notice that Hurley is really the only voice of reason on the island?” Another quote from De, but this time I agree. Hurley is my favorite character on the island, and I think he’s losing weight. He also makes sense and comes out and says what everybody else is thinking. The only thing he gets weird about is the numbers, and he hasn’t mentioned them in a while.

3. So, when did Locke lose the use of his legs? He seems to have lived a full life: Daddy problems, Mommy problems, organ donor, girlfriend problems, running from the money guys, member of a druggie commune/cult, and then paralysis? I’m not sure I’ve got it all in the right order, but anyway you look at it he’s been a busy man. And he worked at a box company in his spare time.

4. We have an abundance of prophets on this island. Is Mr. Eko the prophet/messenger of God? Or is Boone a prophet come back from the dead? Desmond reminds me a bit of Elijah with a Scots accent. And at the end he seemed to be a prophet, or someone who was living backwards, or something.

5. How are the Beach People going to manage without Jack the Doctor or Sun the Herbalist? You’d think there would be a nurse or something in the group, but I suppose that information would have surfaced by now with all the medical emergencies they’ve been through.

I think tonight was a bit of a let down. I don’t like all the sweat lodge mumbo-jumbo. I don’t like Locke, faith or no faith. I added a picture of Sun last week, but no picture of Locke will be forthcoming. If Locke’s going to be the new hero of the play, they’re going to have to work on his character as far as I’m concerned. Rescuing Mr. Eko from a polar bear won’t hack it. But I’m glad Mr. Eko isn’t dead.

The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins

Well, I’ve finished my fourth RIP selection. The Woman in White was a good story. However, I must say that reading it at the same time as Kristin Lavransdatter must have colored my response to the Collins book, especially my response to the characters in the book. About a fourth of the way through the book I was hoping the female love interest, Laura, would die and get out of the way so that her much more interesting half-sister could get the guy. Did anyone else find Laura to be annoyingly weak and helpless? Is she really a type of the ideal Victorian woman? If so, give me a medieval woman any day.

Laura marries a man she doesn’t love because her dead father planned the marriage, and she doesn’t think anyone would condone her marriage to her true love, the art teacher. Kristin Lavransdatter, on the other hand, breaks her betrothal to her father’s choice of a husband, and then she prepares to run away with her own lover and thereby forces her father to approve the marriage. So Kristin’s behavior is disrespectful, dishonorable, and unwise. At least, she has a mind, and she lives with the results of her decision. Laura, on the hand, Lady Glyde as she becomes, glides through her life, letting others move her around like a pawn on a chessboard.

The villain of The Woman in White is, however, a consummate evil genius. Count Fosco is worthy of joining the list of Best Villains. He’s large and dark and hypnotic and smooth and deceptive and ultimately slimy. If I wrote a book with a villain, I’d want Count Fosco to make an appearance at least as tutor to my own villainous creation.

The plot has a few holes. Why does Laura marry such an idiot? Why does her husband put up with Laura’s half-sister coming to live with the married couple even though she interferes with his plans? Why does the WOman in WHite keep floating in and out of the story without ever doing anything significant? Can two people (not identical twins)look so much alike that they can be mistaken for one another even by their own family members? Still, while reading the book, I held these and other questions in abeyance; I just wanted to know what would happen next. I especially wanted to know what would happen to the magnificently nasty Count Fosco.

Read it and find out. Step over the holes carefully.

Kristin Lavransdatter by Sigrid Undset

With the ‘domestic epic’, a sweeping drama set against a carefully studied social background, she broke a new ground. Undset turned away from the sentimental style of national romanticism and wanted to re-create the realism of the Icelandic sagas and write so vividly, that “everything that seem(s) romantic from here – murder, violence, etc becomes ordinary – comes to life,” as the author explained. . . . Undset’s emphasis on women’s biological nature, and her view that motherhood is the highest duty (to which) a woman can aspire, has been criticized by feminists as reactionary. —Kirjasto

I’m not surprised that feminist critics might not appreciate Sigrid Undset’s Kristin Lavransdatter. What a story! I actually began reading this story of a medieval Norwegian mother and wife a long time ago, but found myself unable to stay with it. This time I read it in three separate paperback books, The Bridal Wreath (Part 1), Mistress of Husaby (Part 2), and The Cross (Part 3). I think the three separate books made it more digestible and less intimidating. Anyway, this time I not only read the entire book, over a thousand pages, but I enjoyed it so much that I plan to add it to my list of the 100 Best Fiction Books Ever Written.

The Bridal Wreath tells the story of Kristin’s childhood, her growth into womanhood, her betrothal, her sin and loss of honor, and her marriage. For better or for worse, the decisions that Kristin makes in this first book determine the remainder of the events of her life and her willfulness in choosing her own husband throws a shadow over even the happiest of times in her later life. Kristin is a likeable protagonist, but very much a fallible one. Book 1 of this trilogy is about rebellion and how easy it is to fall into sin, how justifiable it seems. The story also demonstrates how one sin leads to another and “what a tangled web we weave.”

Nevertheless, Kristin becomes The Mistress of Husaby, the medieval estate of her husband, Erlend. She gives her husband sons, seven sons. They are rich in land, in friends, in family. But their character, or lack thereof, comes back to haunt the two of them and their marriage again and again. Having started off on the wrong foot, so to speak, Kristin and her husband can never manage to live in harmony for long. Erlend is careless and untrustworthy, just as he was when Kristin married him. Kristin is often shrewish and disrespectful in response to her husband’s irresponsibility. Still they build a marriage that, just barely, outlasts the storms of adultery, abandonment, imprisonment, sickness, and disgrace.

In Book 3, The Cross, Kristin is getting old for a woman of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. She’s in her forties as the story progresses. Her sons are growing up, and her husband is growing old. Kristin must learn the lesson of self-denial and letting go of those whom she loves fiercely and somewhat possessively. Perhaps as my children grow up and begin to leave the nest in little ways, I identify with Kristin in this book most of all. She wants so much to shield her sons from harm and from difficulty, but most of all from themselves and the trouble they will bring upon themselves by their own sins and bad decisions. Oh, I do want the same thing.

“When you yourself had borne a child, Kristin, methought you would understand,” her mother had said once. Now, she understood that her mother’s heart had been scored deep with memories of her daughter, memories of thoughts for her child from the time it was unborn and from all the years a child remembers nothing of, memories of fear and hope and dreams that children never know have been dreamed for them, until their own time comes to fear and hope and dream in secret —

But Kristin learns that her sons have their own dreams and their own unwise decisions to make. And she can only pray for them and leave them to the mercy of God. She comes to realize, too, that her own prayers have always been answered by a faithful God, that she has always been in His hand, even when He allowed her to follow the sinful desires of her own heart.

Never, it seemed to her had she prayed to God for aught else than that He might grant her her own will. And she had got always what she wished—most. And now she sat here with a bruised spirit—not because she had sinned against God, but because she was miscontent that it had been granted her to follow the devices of her own heart to the journey’s end.

seal: best books
Oh, that the Lord would say “no” and put a barrier in my way when I ask Him for what I think I want but what He does not will. And I pray the same for my children. But sometimes He sees that we need to experience the fruits of our willful decisions before we can see clearly that His will is best.

Kristin Lavransdatter is a wonderful book for wives and mothers especially, for those of us who sometimes struggle with those roles and who often delight in the same. If it’s slow going at first, please persist. The language is beautiful, but somewhat archaic and stilted. I think you’ll find the book worth getting through any initial difficulties.

Visit Semicolon’s Amazon Store for more great book recommendations.