Archive | July 2006

Episcopal/Anglican Blogs and Bloggers

First of all, can anyone enlighten me? Is the adjectival form “Episcopalian” or “episcopal”? Or will either adjective work? And are Anglicans located only in Britain and British-influenced countries, or does it have to do with with who’s affiliated with whom? What is the difference between Episcopalians and Anglicans?

Whatever it is, At a Hen’s Pace is the blog of an Anglican homeschooling mom of six. She’s married to an Anglican priest, and she’s fond of books and children–just like me.

The Waffling Anglican offers “thoughts and ruminations about anything that comes up by an ex-Episcopalian as he waffles between embracing a Continuing Anglican parish or swimming the Tiber (or Euphrates?) to an Eastern Catholic church.”

Will Duquette at A View from the Foothills is Anglican. Ugandan Anglican, to be exact. Will writes about books and children and photography and assorted stuff.

A guide at the blog Mere Comments to the Anglican organizations and groups that are now active in the United States. This post is very useful for those investigating Anglicanism in the U.S.

If you’re Anglican or Episcopalian or both and I didn’t mention you, please leave a comment.

Anglican Lit 101

Espiscopalians and Anglicans are having their problems these days. ((Also here.) As an encouragement and since I gave a post the week before last to my Catholic brethren and sisters, this week I thought I’d highlight some of my favorite books with an Anglican or Episcopalian setting or background.

The twin Episcopalians are, of course, Jan Karon and Madeleine L’Engle. A Severed Wasp by Ms. L’Engle which takes place in and around the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City is delightfully Episcopalian. It was in this book that I learned that there are orders of Episcopal nuns (how was I to know?) and that a whole microcosm of society can be contained within the walls of a cathedral. In addition, A Severed Wasp tells a great story about faith and betrayal and abuse and forgiveness.

Jan Karon’s Mitford novels are also very Episcopalian. I just read Lauren Winner’s Girl Meets God, and she admits to reading and enjoying the Mitford books with a sort of a guilty pleasure. I don’t feel guilty about them at all. My definition of great literature is still evolving, and the Mitford books are definitely on my list of 100 greatest fiction books of all time, whether anyone else considers them great literature or not. Father Tim, the main character in the Mitford books, is an Episcopal priest, and he lives a life full of small joys and small crises that all add up to a life lived Big in the presence of the Lord Jesus. It’s Christianity as it actually plays out in the lives of everyday people, a quotidian kind of Christianity as my friend at Mental Multivitamin might say. (Thanks for the addition to my vocabulary, MFS.)

C.S.Lewis was Anglican, but the atmosphere of his books is more “mere Christianity.” Dorothy Sayers and P.D. James are more conspicuously Anglican. Parts of their stories take place in Anglican cathedrals and monasteries and other religious places. Death in Holy Orders by P.D. James is set in an Anglican theological college. In Dorothy Sayers’ The Nine Tailors the church and especially the church bells are central to the setting and the plot of the mystery.

Reaching back into Victorian England, there’s Anthony Trollope whose Barsetshire novels are set in a fictional cathedral town populated by all sorts of curates, prebendaries, archdeacons, canons, vicars, and bishops. Very Victorian. Very Church of England. I’ve read Barchester Towers (a long time ago), and I’m in the process of reading Framley Parsonage.. I’ll let you know how I like it when I’m done. I hesitate to say that this quotation from Barchester Towers, which I prophetically recorded about thirty years ago when I read that novel, characterizes the current state of the Anglican communion; however, if the shoe fits . . .

Mr. Arabin:“It is the bane of my life that on important subjects I acquire no fixed opinion. I think, and think, and go on thinking, and yet my thoughts are running ever in different directions.”

I’ve read revews and recommendations for the clerical fiction of Susan Howatch. Has anyone here read her books?

For nonfiction, I like these Anglican and Episcopalian authors and apologists: C.S. Lewis, John R.W. Stott, Os Guinness, and J.I. Packer. The best book the Church of England ever produced was The Book of Common Prayer, a classic if there ever was one.

A Reading Meme from Rachel

To begin my week of guest-blogging for my mother, I’ve decided to cheat and answer a book meme that I found chez Laura. It’s as good a way of introducing myself as anything else, especially since I think you should always judge a man or woman by what he or she reads.

1. A book that made you cry: Well, aside from the obvious choices (Anne of Green Gables, anyone?), I was moved by the middle sequence of To the Lighthouse, the part wherein Woolf narrates the disintegration of a house and a family. The writing itself is completely unemotional, and I think that’s why the passage works.

2. A book that scared you: Usually I don’t read scary stuff, because I don’t enjoy the thrill that comes with being afraid (never liked to ride the roller coaster at Astroworld either). And I’ve never considered classic British murder mysteries scary (think Dame Agatha, Sayers, Tey, etc.), so I’ve gobbled up quite a few in my day – but one that really frightened me was And Then There Were None. Keep in mind that in the book version, as opposed to the play, everyone but the murderer ends up dead. Very creepy. Oh, and I remember being quite scared by the character of Simon Legree in Uncle Tom’s Cabin, which I read very late at night around the age of fourteen. One of those can’t-get-out-of-the-bed-because-something-might-grab-me experiences.

3. A book that made you laugh: James Herriot’s animal books are a hoot – start with All Creatures Great and Small.

4. A book that disgusted you: The Grapes of Wrath. My first Baylor roommate loved Steinbeck, but to me he is simply depressing. Maybe I just read it at the wrong time.

5. A book you loved in elementary school: I was really into series reading at the time, but one stand-alone choice I loved was Lark, by Sally Watson. I believe it is out of print, even though it is an enchanting introduction to the British Civil War through the eyes of an independent-minded young girl who must aid a Royalist spy to evade his enemies by means of disguises, play-acting, and even the Gypsies as a last resort.

6. A book you loved in middle school: Jane Eyre. Read it the summer of seventh grade and was inspired to read Wuthering Heights as a follow-up; don’t remember being quite as impressed at the time by Emily as I was by Charlotte.

7. A book you loved in high school: Just one? My favorite was probably either Emily’s Quest, by L.M. Montgomery (confession: during my sophomore and junior years of high school I was heavily addicted to a kindred-spirits listserv, of all things, which aside from your humble servant was mostly made up of librarians) or A Ring of Endless Light, by Madeleine L’Engle – yes, we’re all fans at my house.

8. A book you loved in college: I’m still in college. I discovered Dorothy Dunnett’s Chronicles of Lymond two summers ago and fell in love with the complicated erudite hero – he’s sort of a renaissance Lord Peter Wimsey minus the moral principles. There are six books, all set in the mid-sixteenth century, and they take a little while to get into, but if you have a little patience you’ll soon be hooked. As a side note, Dunnett’s historical research is impeccable, or at least so I’ve read. The Game of Kings comes first.

9. A book that challenged your identity or your faith: Believe it or not, The Westminster Shorter Catechism, which I was assigned to read for school in seventh grade, and which forced me to realize there were other brands of Christianity besides the one affirmed at my Southern Baptist church.

10. A series that you love: Definitely Dorothy Sayers’ Wimsey mysteries, beginning with Strong Poison, in which the aristocratic detective saves Harriet Vane from the hangman’s noose, and ending with Busman’s Honeymoon, in which he marries her. The best one, though, is Gaudy Night, where Sayers explores the issue of women in academia versus women who choose to marry – yes, this was an issue in 1935, and no, it’s not totally irrelevant in 2006.

11. Your favorite horror book: See answer to question 2.

12. Your favorite science-fiction book: I’m going to have to pick another L’Engle and go with A Wrinkle in Time. Read it and the sequels for the first time when I was sick with a very bad cold, which just made them that much stranger. I’m not actually that much into sci-fi as a genre.

13. Your favorite fantasy book: The Lord of the Rings, no contest. But I also love Robin McKinley’s stuff, especially Beauty and Rose Daughter, two varying approaches to the re-telling of the same fairy-tale.

14. Your favorite mystery book: Leaving Sayers out because I’ve already mentioned her, it would probably come down to one of Josephine Tey’s novels, either Brat Farrar or The Daughter of Time.

15. Your favorite biography: Maybe Nicholas and Alexandra, by Robert K. Massie. Had to read it for a European history class senior year of high school, and I guess it’s not exactly a biography, but it is a thrilling narrative of the tragedy of the last Russian emperor and his family.

16. Your favorite coming-of-age book: The Greengage Summer, by Rumer Godden, in which an adolescent girl spends a summer with her family in the Marne Valley and must deal with evil coming from an unexpected source.

17. Your favorite book not on this list: That is very hard to say, but I’ll go with The Brothers Karamazov. Dostoevsky asks all the right questions and gives literature its most convincing and sympathetic good guy. I dare you to read it and not fall in love with Alyosha.

Wind, Sand, and Stars by Antoine de Saint-Exupery

I did manage to find this 1939 book and read it:
“And these human relations must be created. One must go through an apprenticeship to learn the job. Games and risk are a help here. When we exchange manly handshakes, compete in races, join together to save one of us who is in trouble, cry aloud for help in the hour of danger —only then do we learn that we are not alone on earth.” p. 29

“What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.It is always the same step, but you have to take it.” p.38

“Life has taught us that love does not consist in gazing at each other but in looking outward together in the same direction. There is no comradeship except through union in the same high effort.” p. 215

I think I’ve read that last quotation in a greeting card somewhere, but that only makes it shopworn, perhaps, not untrue. Saint Exupery’s strength in Wind, Sand, and Stars is the stories he tells about his almost death of dehydration stranded in the Sahara desert, about his experiences in Spain during the Spanish civil war, about flying over the Pyrenees and the Andes. To get those stories, you’ll have to read the book.

His diagnosis of the plight of mankind and the cause of war is not so profound. He says that we all believe in something, and “fulfillment is promised each of us by his religion.” All beliefs are essentially the same, and we must not discuss ideologies. We must instead understand that “what all of us want is to be set free.” “There are two hundred million men in Europe whose existence has no meaning and who yearn to come alive,” writes Saint Exupery.

I don’t know if Saint Exupery was a Christian although he was educated in Jesuit schools. Nevertheless, he ends his book with these rather cryptic words: “Only the Spirit, if it breathe upon the clay, can create Man.”

Read the book, and his other classic Le Petit Prince and draw your own conclusions.

A Mexico

Early in the morning Organizer Daughter and I leave for Mexico. We’re headed for Matamoros to do construction work on a church building. And I’m supposed to help teach Vacation Bible School. In Spanish.
(Please pray for my Spanish.)

However, I’m leaving the blog in capable hands. I have some posts scheduled to appear at intervals throughout the week. And I have a guest blogger who actually writes more lucid and fascinating prose than I do. Eldest Daughter, the one who just returned from a year of study in Paris, will post a few times while I’m gone. I told her to write about whatever she wanted, but it will probably be something about her twin passions: literature and languages.

Hasta luego, amigos.

Friday’s Center of the Blogosphere

The Anchoress identifies the source of the world’s problems: fruit.

I’ve read some science fiction, and Engineer Husband works at NASA; however, this thought never occurred to me. Are we going beyond the boundaries that God set for Adam’s race in Genesis when we attempt to explore, maybe even colonize, the Moon or other planets?

Stefanie at So Many Books on reading goals and halfway day. Last week, I posted my list of books read so far this year. Best books read this year: River Rising by Athol Dickson, Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card<, Jewel by Brett Lott, and Girl Meets God by Lauren Winner.

Anthony Esolen on a Christian basis for comedy. I think I understand what he’s talking about, although I’m still trying to wrap my mind around it. The ancient Greek comedies are all about politics and scorn for the stupidity of the opposition, aren’t they? I don’t what other ancient peoples laughed about. Esolen writes about “the strange belief, quite foreign to the pagans, that laughter too might be redemptive, as participating in the greatest comedy of all, that of a world wherein man is saved by the means he least expects, and therefore by the most fitting and comical means of all. For the fact is that we like Bottom not just as a source of laughter, but as Bottom and no other; as we like Don Quixote, and Charlie Brown, and the fat bus driver Ralph Kramden. We like them because we take for granted that they are of inestimable value, and because we know that they replicate, in particularly ridiculous form, a story that is our own.” This piece reminds me of that particularly “Christian” movie about Jews during the Holocaust, Life Is Beautiful. Only people who believe in forgiveness and some sort of redemption could make a movie that laughs in the middle of supreme tragedy.

Finally, I hate the entire premise of this post at Wittingshire, maybe because I’m afraid there’s a nugget of truth there? Does the reading of fiction insulate you from reality and give you the illusion of having lived, or does fiction inspire you to do the work of loving and serving real people?

A Little More Dickens

From Charles Dickens by Jane Smiley:

“Every novel is a logical argument —an assertion of the author’s sense of what life is, embodied in characters, plots, and images.”

Dickens “took up the habit of long, vigorous daily walks that seem almost unimaginable today for an otherwise very busy man with many obligations. At a pace of twelve to fifteen minutes per mile, he regularly covered twenty and sometimes thirty miles.” Unimaginable, indeed! Those were four to six hour walks!

“Dickens’s letters increasingly betray dissatisfaction with Catherine’s ‘slowness’ and her invariable postpartum depressions. It seems not to have occurred to him that curbing his own appetites and relieving her from an endless cycle of pregnancy and parturition was a possibility.” The Dickenses had nine children in fifteen years; then Mr. Dickens divorced his wife in a fit of what we would now probably call midlife crisis.

Ah, but he wrote wonderful novels!

To This Great Stage of Fools: Born July 6th

Cheryl Harness, b.1951. Author and illustrator of many children’s biographies and books about American historical events, including Three Young Pilgrims, Young John Quincy, Young Abe Lincoln, and The Remarkable Benjamin Franklin. I’m telling you these are beautifully illustrated books, and Ms. Harness tells a good story, too.

Nancy Reagan, b. 1921.

George W. Bush, b. 1946 in New Haven, Connecticut. Happy Birthday, Mr. President!

Isn’t it rather funny that Nancy Reagan and President Bush have the same birthdate?

Works-For-Me Wednesday: Friday Night Movie Night

Curly Top



One of our family traditions is Friday night movies and pizza. We try not to watch much TV or videos during the week, but on Friday the kids (and parents) may watch a movie, eat pizza, and, best of all, sleep in the living room! I don’t usually sleep in the living room, but Engineer Husband is such a good daddy that he’s been sleeping in the living room on the floor with four or five or six urchins on Friday nights for the past ten or twelve years.

“Friday night is movie night” works for me because it limits the movie time to one night a week. It also creates a family time for movies, and we have to try to pick out movies that the entire family, ages four to fifty, will enjoy together. We haven’t chosen a movie for this Friday. Any suggestions?

Semicolon’s 105 Best Movies of All Time

For more Works-for-me-Wednesday ideas, visit Shannon at Rocks in my Dryer.

Charles Dickens by Jane Smiley

I’ve been spending all my reading time with Charles Dickens this week, not reading one of his novels, but rather a biography in the series Penguin Lives by novelist Jane Smiley.

I was struck by several facts and observations. I had a vague memory that Dickens had a troubled marriage and that he had some kind of “relationship” with an actress named Ellen Ternan. “Some sort” is about right. According to Ms. Smiley, none of the Dickens’s biographers or critics can decide whether Ellen Ternan was Dickens’ mistress or whether he acted toward her with exteme propriety in an avuncular manner. He did divorce his wife not too long after he met the eighteen year old Ms. Ternan; Dickens was forty-five years old when he met his erstwhile “niece.” Shades of Arthur Gride, the old man in Nicholas Nickleby; however, Dickens wasn’t after Ms. Ternan’s money. She hadn’t any, and she and her mother and sisters lived off of Dickens for the rest of his life.

I thought the order of Dickens’ novels was interesting, too. I knew Pickwick Papers was Dickens’ first book. After Pickwick was such a success, he wrote the following major works in order:

2. Oliver Twist, one of my favorite Dickens’ novels. However, it was rather grisly to read that Dickens, toward the end of his life, made a mint doing dramatic readings of the murder of Nancy Sikes to much popular acclaim.

3. Nicholas Nickleby Two of my girls were in a play this spring based on this novel. That’s why I remember Arthur Gride.

4. Barnaby Rudge. I’ve not read this one.

5. The Old Curiosity Shop. I’ve not read this one either, but I’ve always heard the stories of how everyone on both sides of the Atlantic was anxiously dreading the possible death of Little Nell as the book was published in installments. Ms. Smiley quotes Oscar Wilde: “One must have a heart of stone to read the death of Little Nell without laughing.” Cynical old Oscar.

6. American Notes for General Circulation. In this travelogue, Dickens wrote about his tour of America in which he offended his hosts and he was, in turn, “eager to get home.”

7. Martin Chuzzlewit is another Dickensensian novel that I haven’t read. I fact, I suppose, Dickens fan notwithstanding, I’ve read fewer than half of the novels Dickens wrote.

8. A Christmas Carol. Dickens created Ebenezer Scrooge and his ghosts during October and November of 1843 while he was finishing Martin Chuzzlewit. “With power must come an inner sense of connection to others that, in Dickens’s life and work, comes from the model of Jesus Christ as benevolent Saviour.”

9.Dombey and Son. Another Dickens novel I have to anticipate. Ms. Smiley compares it to Vanity Fair. I thought it was funny that, according to Ms. Smiley, Thackeray expressed a definite sense of rivalry with Dickens that Dickens never seemed to notice or reciprocate. Dickens called himself “the Inimitable” and gave out indiscriminate, benevolent encouragement to other lesser beings.

10.David Copperfield. As Dickens himself did, I absolutely love David Copperfield. I like all the characters, Miss Betsy Trotwqood, Mr. Dick, Mr. Micawber and all the little Micawbers, Dora and Agnes, Peggotty and Little Em’ly, even Steerforth and Uriah Heep. David Copperfield is just so much fun, and it doesn’t really get melodramatic as A Tale of Two Cities and other Dickensian novels sometimes do.

11. Bleak House. I wouldn’t know except from what I deduce from the title, but Ms. Smiley says that Bleak House is “the most unhopeful of Dickens’s novels.” It sold well, though. Maybe bleak and unhopeful sells.

12. Hard Times sounds as if it would be another bleak novel. Dancer Daughter read this one last year for a class and hated it. She’s not alone. Charlotte Bronte complained that she disliked Dickens’s “extravagance.” Trollope called Dickens “Mr. Popular Sentiment.” George Eliot, in spite of Dickens’s praise for her work, thought Dickens’s novels were shallow and melodramatic. (This criticism comes from the author of Mill on the Floss, which may not be shallow but definitely leans toward the melodramatic.)

13. Little Dorrit. After Dickens finished writing Little Dorrit in June 1857, Hans Christian Andersen came to visit and overstayed his welcome. This summer was also the summer of his meeting with and falling in love with Ellen Ternan, and by the next summer he was formally separated from his wife, Catherine, and seeking a divorce. It was messy, public divorce attended by all sorts of nasty rumors, even though Catherine “maintained her loyalty to her husband for the rest of her life” and biographers “record no instances of anger or recrimination, either in public or in writing, on her part.” Dickens, unfortunately, was not so circumspect. His own daughters characterized his behaviour during the divorce proceedings as “wicked and “mad.”

14. A Tale of Two Cities. Another favorite of mine. I probably don’t know too much more about the French Revolution than what I learned from A Tale of Two Cities. I just re-read thi novel for my British Literature class last year, and I found it just as good as the first time I read it in ninth grade.

15. Great Expectations. I have fond memories of this novel because we read it aloud as a family when the first four urchins were only elementary school age. Yes, there were some things they found difficult to understand, but everybody got the basic plotline. And we all grew quite fond of young Pip.

16. Our Mutual Friend was Dickens’s last completed novel. I’m quite interested in reading this one because Ms. Smiley says it’s “Dickens’s perfect novel, seamless and true and delightful in every line.” Also, I want to know why Desmond (LOST) was carrying Our Mutual Friend around with him, unread. He said he was saving it to be the last novel he read before he died. I’m not sure how one would pull that trick off, but I’m intrigued enough to want to read the novel to see what it’s about and why the writers of LOST would use it as a prop.

17. The Mystery of Edwin Drood, Dickens’s last novel, was never finished.

Sorry, this post has become unmanagably long. Especially if you’re not a Dickens fan. Chalk it up to the influence of the The Inimitable.

Maybe I’ll finish up tomorrow with a couple of more quotations Jane Smiley’s biography.