Archive | September 2004

One more quote from Jonathan Edwards

We just read Jonathan Edwards for my American Literature discussion group. We all agreed that Edwards’ sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, wouldn’t go over too well nowadays. I’m not sure that’s an indictment of the sermon as much as it is of us and our culture. We also read Edwards’ Personal Narrative from which I extracted this quote:

On January 12, 1723, I made a solemn dedication of myself to God, and wrote it down; giving up myself, and all that I had to God; to be for the future in no respect my own; to act as one that had no right to himself, in any respect. And solemnly vowed to take God for my whole portion and felicity; looking on nothing else as any part of my happiness, nor acting as if it were; and his law for the constant rule of my obedience; engaging to fight with all my might against the world, the flesh, and the devil, to the end of my life. But I have reason to be infinitely humbled when I consider how much I have failed of answering my obligation.

How humbled should those of us be who have failed to even attempt such a commitment!

Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God

So preached Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758):

And now you have an extraordinary opportunity, a day wherein Christ has thrown the door of mercy wide open, and stands in it calling and crying with a loud voice to poor sinners; a day wherein many are flocking to him, and pressing into the kingdom of God. Many are daily coming from the east, west, north and south; many that were very lately in the same miserable condition that you are in, are now in a happy state, with their hearts filled with love to him who has loved them, and washed them from their sins in his own blood, and rejoicing in hope of the glory of God. How awful is it to be left behind at such a day! To see so many others feasting, while you are pining and perishing! To see so many rejoicing and singing for joy of heart, while you have cause to mourn for sorrow of heart, and howl for vexation of spirit! How can you rest one moment in such a condition? Are not your souls as precious as the souls of the people at Suffield, where they are flocking from day to day to Christ?

Reader, you, too are given this opportunity to give yourself to Him now. How can you rest until you do?

And again–from a liberal East coast perspective

From an article at Tech Central Station by James Pinkerton:

. . . demography is destiny. To put it bluntly, in the name of “empowerment,” the Left has birth-controlled, aborted, and maybe also gay-libbed itself into a smaller role in American society. Yes, it was their personal-is-political choice, but others will benefit politically.

Nearly four decades after the sit-ins of the 60s, ex-radicals are more likely to be staging die-offs — their own. And oh yes, they forgot to have children. The future belongs to the fecund.

So what should pro-choice America do?
Answer: if you can’t breed ’em, you gotta persuade ’em. That is, if the conservatives are cranking out kids, then the liberals have to gotta grab a certain percentage of them and adjust their thinking.

Teach your children well–or the liberal boogie-men will get them. Recruitment is the only substitute for reproduction.

Peter Pan Lives Forever

Crime novelist Ridley Pearson and humor columnist Dave Barry have collaborated to write a prequel to J.M. Barrie’s Peter Pan. Entitled Peter and the Starcatchers, the book answers Pearson’s daughter’s question, “But, Dad how did Peter meet Captain Hook in the first place?” From an article in the Miami Herald:

The story takes place on board the ship, Never Land, bound for Rundoon with Peter, four fellow orphans from St. Norbert’s Home for Wayward Boys, and a closely guarded trunk full of ”starstuff,” a magical substance with the power to make people fly or stop aging.
Naturally, the starstuff is stolen, first by a cretin named Slank, then by a nefarious pirate named Black Stache (named for his facial hair), then recovered by some vicious (but quite attractive) mermaids, and finally coveted by island natives who speak their own dialect, in addition to English and French. (Talking dolphins also play a crucial role in the plot. Hey, it’s a fantasy.)
It’s up to Peter to help the secret society called the Starcatchers — led by a comely teen named Molly — get the starstuff back.

Oh, and by the way, September 19 is National Talk Like a Pirate Day. (And thanks to Brandywine Books for the tip on the new book.)

Children are the Future

Try this thesis on for size: Conservatives are the wave of the future because . . conservatives, especially religious conservatives, dare I even say Christians and Mormons, are the ones who are actually reproducing themselves. From a September 2, 2004 article in the Washington Post by Phillip Longman, author of The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity and What to Do About It:

What’s the difference between the protesters outside the Republican convention and the delegates inside? There are many, of course, but one will ultimately skew American politics and the culture wars in the Republicans’ favor, regardless of who has God or reason on her side. It’s the divide between who is having children and who isn’t.

Over the past decade, fertility rates among all major American ethnic groups have either remained low or fallen dramatically. Between 1990 and 2002 fertility declined 14 percent among Mexican Americans and 24 percent among Puerto Ricans. African Americans, according to the National Center for Health Statistics, now have a lower average fertility rate than whites, and they are no longer producing enough children to replace their population. But one big difference in fertility rates remains: Conservative, religiously minded Americans are putting far more of their genes into the future than their liberal, secular counterparts.

So I’m doing my part; may God bless the fruit of the womb and bring revival and repentance to the U.S.A.

Who said it?

Which presidential candidate’s foreign policy does this sound most like?

“We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analyzing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will. I cannot believe that such a program would be rejected by the people of this country, even if it does mean the establishment of personal contact with the dictators.”

“It has always seemed to me that in dealing with foreign countries we do not give ourselves a chance of success unless we try to understand their mentality, which is not always the same as our own.”

These quotations are from neither of our two presidential candidates but rather from a famous English leader. I’ll give you a hint. I got the idea for this post from Thomas Sowell’s latest column (dated August 26, 2004).